@versollato@TedBuddy8 FIFA protocol (that you and many others quote) is not applied here, because Matanovic is not in offside position. Just read the rules correctly. In this case, hair of Pasalic would be ignored if it was close. It was not.
@basket3ca@SamoParBG@milosevic1969 U stvari je obrnuto. Senzor je više reliabilan nego video snimka. Zato se i koristi slicne senzore in druge kamere za polu-avtomatski offside, primjer su zaleda kad je suden Ronaldu ili Sucicu.
Slicna situacija se desila na utakmici Švedska Tuniz za gol Švedana.
@basket3ca@SamoParBG@milosevic1969 I dodao bi još, da je taj dodir Matanoviča kriv, da je sudac protumačio, da Veiga nije reagiro s namjerom i zato je na kraju dosudio offside. Ak Matanovič ne dira loptu, jel onda ona dode do Pašalića ili ne.
@basket3ca@SamoParBG@milosevic1969 Da na snimki se ne vidi direktna promjena putanje lopte - al ak je on promijenio putanju za 1° (dodir je bio ak gledamo senzor), onda na razdalji 1,5 metra to može značit 10-15 centimetara - što je razlika izmedu reakcije Veige, da izbije ispred loptu sebe ili iza sebe.
@basket3ca@SamoParBG@milosevic1969 To pravilo FIFE valja za igrača u offsidu, ne igrača koji dira loptu na putu do igrača u offsidu.
Nemoj miješat stvari. Kod Matanovića se gleda samo početak akcije, nevezanu uz to jel on promijenio put lopte nogom, glavom ili kosom. Kosa za offside bi se ignorirala kot Pasalica.
@kjbekjrthkhelg@danielstorey85 Which two chances? Bruno chance was Leao, and Portugal arguably did not have any other chances rather than the offside, penalty, Ramos goal and Leao crossbar.
Nuno Mendes only won 50% of all his duels, had more lost possessions than key passes and dribbles combined.
@kjbekjrthkhelg@danielstorey85 If you really consider Nuno Mendes the best player yesterday - you have no idea what you’re talking about.
If anyone was the best, it was Diogo Costa or Ruben Dias. Best player of the game is not leaky at the back and with zero dribbles in the attack.