@ettingermentum Don't see the issue. He is basically saying he can agree to disagree on the actual act, and will still take action to get it codifed.
That seems like a solid response. Just cuz he feels some type of way, doesn't mean he is correct, and he accepts it?
@amandamull 10 years ago, this would have had consequences. I specifically remember leaving reddit/FB groups cuz the admins were airing out their personal drama.
Now if anything they gain more members. People love the drama
@WhiteHouse@POTUS I say focus on the jackes up drink prices at venues. I went to Blink 182 and paid 92.00 for 6 tall boys. No, I am not on the spectrum. I'm just a miserable alcoholic.
@laurenboebert Lol, please shut up. Let your results speak for you for once. Your promises mean nothing. So I'm not gonna take this or anything the GOP says seriously ๐๐๐
@LethalityJane Another example of why everyone should figure out how to comprehend "reasonable exclusions" Like... yes, better safe than sorry, but is this REASONABLE? Or excessive? Locking your door at night = Reasonable. Chaining your child to a shopping cart? = Excessive.
@Acyn Desantis will win. You dumb liberals are already clowning on him and saying he won't win. 2016 vibes all again. Take him seriously, and vote accordingly.
@TeamYouTube@JimSterling There needs to be some kinda law that stops vague penalties. It sounds dumb, but many other big companies, mainly in finance, already have them. If you can't point to an infraction and clearly explain why something broke policy, then you get fined and pay out a minimum.
@ev Dude, Idk what country you are in, but in my own country, we can't even vote out the guy directly responsible for loosening laws that got like 40 children killed. Good luck with "political" influence. Everyone and everything is just so selfish nowadays.