TheNewLitigation

Freedom of speech lawyer. Standing counsel to Rupert Lowe MP. Known to some as The Duke.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

If a politician or civil servant has knowingly placed dangerous third world rapists among our women and children, a Restore Britain Government will send those people to prison.

If we need more prisons, we’ll build them.

[Andrew Rosindell MP 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @AndrewRosindell]

This morning I signed EDM 1160 tabled by @RupertLowe10 about the recognition and preservation of English, Scottish, Welsh and Irish ethnic identities. Since then, my Reform UK colleague @SuellaBraverman has also signed the EDM.

I believe that we are privileged to have a common British identity that we must all cherish and defend, but within the United Kingdom there are four nations that are a home to distinct native ethnic groups formed from early Saxon, Angle, Celtic and Norse peoples.

I also believe that efforts to obscure the existence of these ethnic groupings through the conflation of citizenship can only serve to deepen divisions and deny the native peoples of these islands their own unique identities.

Some on the left will have an alternative view, but this is the very reason that Parliament exists, to hold meaningful and uninhibited debate on these issues within the chamber of @HouseofCommons 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇬🇧

https://t.co/fmISHn7FKr

[TheNewLitigation @NewLitigation]

@DanNeidle Lawfare

[Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 @TRobinsonNewEra]

This....

[a Zeleny @BettrStranger]

Summary of the article “Why I Deny Elections” by Tim Meisburger (Chronicles Magazine, ~Nov 9–10, 2026)

Tim Meisburger, who spent nearly 30 years monitoring and assessing foreign elections (starting as a UN District Electoral Supervisor in Cambodia’s 1993 transitional election and ending as Director of the Center for Democracy, Rights and Governance in the first Trump administration), argues candidates elected in the recent midterms should not be considered legitimate.

Core argument:
The processes used were intentionally non-transparent and designed to prevent effective monitoring and verification. Overseas, this kind of managed obfuscation is treated as a clear sign of a corrupt election; the same standards should apply at home.
Specific problems he cites:
• Voter ID: Supported by a large majority of Americans (both parties) and standard in other democracies, yet opposed by Democrats through policy and lawfare.
• Voter rolls: America’s are the most bloated and least accurate in the world. Excess names enable illegal votes; cleaning or auditing rolls is normal elsewhere but fiercely opposed by Democrats in politicized courts.
• Early voting: Creates a break between voting and counting, so ballots float unmonitored for weeks and cannot be properly observed.
• Mail-in / postal voting: The least secure method (noted even by the 2005 Carter-Baker commission). Universal expansion enables theft, stuffing, vote-buying, and intimidation because it occurs outside controlled polling places.
• Machine voting and counting: Long criticized by experts and politicians of both parties for security vulnerabilities; Democrats promote opaque machine processes while opposing cheaper, faster, transparent hand counting.

Meisburger concludes that these features offer little genuine convenience while making elections more expensive, unverifiable, and widely distrusted. He views Democratic (and some Republican) resistance to reform as a strategy that enables manipulation, and therefore treats the candidates elected under these systems as illegitimate until verifiable elections can be held.

He quotes President Trump’s July 16, 2026 remark that the only reason not to do election reform is “because you want to cheat.”
Link: https://t.co/rqKzdvEGJK
@realDonaldTrump

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Yesterday, @EvaVlaar was supposed to speak at a Restore Britain event. The Home Office banned her from entering our country and therefore attending. Here is Eva's response...

[Pugh Himple @GBullstein]

Unlike the rule of law—where the law genuinely constrains power and applies equally—rule by law treats law as a tool. Claiming to act “within the law” becomes an excuse that shields the powerful from real accountability, while ordinary citizens remain fully subject to it.

[TheNewLitigation @NewLitigation]

@Joanna__Hardy An out of court statement tendered to rely on the truth of its content.

[TheNewLitigation @NewLitigation]

@kevinnbass @elonmusk @BasilTheGreat The resistance is to all intents and purposes non-existent, presumably because most westerners are brought up believing that the security of their society is guaranteed. Nothing could be further from the truth sadly,

[TheNewLitigation @NewLitigation]

@kevinnbass @elonmusk @BasilTheGreat Some of us are trying to fix it - not enough of us however

[TheNewLitigation @NewLitigation]

@kevinnbass Spot on, too few people realise this

[TheNewLitigation @NewLitigation]

@kevinnbass Correct. You have to stop them cheating. By whatever means necessary.

[TheNewLitigation @NewLitigation]

@kevinnbass The enemy will destroy you all the more quickly if they think you have given up. So not giving up is the best survival strategy, regardless of how hopeless things seem.

[TheNewLitigation @NewLitigation]

@kevinnbass You lose a rigged game because of a catastrophic misallocation of resources. Throwing $500m at a senate race makes no difference if the results are preprogrammed. And if only a fraction of that sum has been spent on addressing the integrity issue….

[TheNewLitigation @NewLitigation]

@kevinnbass If a game (including an election or court case) is rigged, every dollar sunk into winning by the normal rules is wasted. It should have been spent instead on addressing the rigging.

[TheNewLitigation @NewLitigation]

@kevinnbass Realising they may have been corrupted, but then leaving them in place, is really accepting defeat.

[TheNewLitigation @NewLitigation]

@kevinnbass Once you realise someone is working for your opponent you have to fix that by hook or by crook, long before they can do the irreparable damage. Using whatever tools are necessary. I’ve not seen any evidence of this.

[TheNewLitigation @NewLitigation]

@kevinnbass Political justice is back. It was said to be the darkest chapter of the Weimar Republic.

[TheNewLitigation @NewLitigation]

@nickdemarco_ What a nice occasion