@pdxgrimreaper@AirwolfIi7@sythzmate @nibbler7961 @sweetheartsvoid It is extremely appropriate in a competitive setting to ask others to switch. In casual modes, correct, asking others to switch can be see inappropriate. There's a reason why the overwhelming majority agrees Kingsman was in the right SPECIFICALLY because of the conditions.
@pdxgrimreaper@AirwolfIi7@sythzmate @nibbler7961 @sweetheartsvoid It'd be more like, "We need to eat healthy, we're trying to compete in the contest" after you suggest McDonalds, and then others causing it to be a bigger issue than it is. It was a sincere suggestion given the context whether you agree with it or not.
@pdxgrimreaper@AirwolfIi7@sythzmate @nibbler7961 @sweetheartsvoid Brother, there is no chance you're saying that someone suggesting nicely they switch off the a hero in the game is them initiating drama. If I suggest you a place to eat and you say you don't want to eat there and people around you make it a big deal, then I did not start it.
@kickspitURF@Apply What part did his lack of social skills play in this? The guy made it clear from the start that he wanted to take this seriously and wanted to go for the full prize. He then insisted on changes for the team to combat popular comps. The others were more socially out of touch.
@fishfishfruit@a1luvvs The girlies drafted him to play in a 40K tournament. The moment money is on the line, the "vibes" come second to winning. How exactly would he know they WERENT there to win money? If they have like it that, then feel free to send him the 3K he could have won since vibes > winning
Money WAS involved, however, which is part of the issue. People wouldn't care so much about the situation if there wasn't an incentive worth playing for. You cannot take out the leading variable and then create a new hypothetical that is inherently different.
I think a big part of this that was not taken into consideration is that there was no willingness to swap on behalf of our otp (which I was willing to work with), and our kicked teammate was putting pressure on them to despite already being told no numerous times. Honestly, if money wasnโt involved, Iโm sure more people would understand why I had no intention of taking either side.
Everyone deserves the criticism but Kingsman with the current info we have.
If you truly cared, you wouldn't be making a public statement saying you're reaching out. You would have done so in private. This reads more like PR than a sincere apology/wanting to make amends.
As a follow-up, this is the most nothing burger of a response I've seen recently. Take responsibility FULLY.
You're a bully. You're not a leader. You shouldn't have a platform until you improve your mentality. Stop using anxiety/panic attacks as a sympathy tactic.
Lol. You kicked a college student off your team for ruining the vibes for wanting to win 40k while you allowed the rest of your teammates to troll a major tournament.
Don't be a team captain again if you struggle to make the call of, "Stop playing the worst character".
@98tp1@eijunami @Brick_Ortiz @TeemoProLegend@SKrojak@Gamebreak0r So easily summoned that it required Sanctifire for them to be relevant after years of being irrelevant. So easy, yes, mhm, uh-huh, that's why no one played them prior to Sanct (and Explusion's) release.
This is a losing case for you, friend, lol.
@98tp1@eijunami @Brick_Ortiz @TeemoProLegend@SKrojak@Gamebreak0r Having niche lines doesn't make the card fine. No one is playing Sanct for that purpose. Without floodgates, Sanct is so niche that lists may cut it completely, as other cards (like Chimera) are better 99% of the time.
@98tp1@eijunami @Brick_Ortiz @TeemoProLegend@SKrojak@Gamebreak0r Hate to break it to you, friend, but in the TCG, there is no Maxx "C". Sanct into Cartesia is much more of a niche line than you're making it out to be. You very rarely do that, hence why I said its MOSTLY used for Evenly + floodgates.
@98tp1@eijunami @Brick_Ortiz @TeemoProLegend@SKrojak@Gamebreak0r Brother, I'm saying your reasoning is flawed. Sanctifire is a problem in the same way Halq is a problem: It enables cards that are otherwise terrible to do degenerate things. Halq enabled Tuners, yet no one said Tuners were the problem.
@98tp1@eijunami @Brick_Ortiz @TeemoProLegend@SKrojak@Gamebreak0r And I'm saying, instead of banning multiple cards for a singular problematic card that limits FUTURE card design, get rid of the card that enables all of this and the other cards fade back to irrelevancy. You're saying ignore the cause and hit everything around it.
@98tp1@eijunami @Brick_Ortiz @TeemoProLegend@SKrojak@Gamebreak0r I'm saying cards that are made relevant specifically because of a singular card are not the problems that need to be dealt with, rather the enabler for such shenanigans. The fact that it made obscure floodgates that are bad relevant is the reason it needs to go.
Think, friend.