@JeffBezos If you are in the 50 to 70th percentile, doesn’t this give you an incentive to earn less money so that you drop into the bottom half? Wouldn’t this incentivize people to be downwardly mobile?
Thank you. The important part is zeroing out taxes on the bottom half. Best way to put money in someone’s pocket is to not take it out in the first place. Bottom half is only 3% of total tax revenue. But it’s very meaningful to that person. Zero it out.
with anthropic, this is where the math stops making sense
raising $50B today 3 months after their last raise, the economics are quite poor
they plan to raise $60B in Q4 - this buys them a few more months
the end result is they have to raise prices, and significantly too
a potential timeline:
postponing ipo
too afraid to file an S1 revealing the real economics of the biz
raising capital again so quickly implies high burn bc of neg gross margin
negative gm + compute constrained leads to increased prices
usage scales back
bubble bursts
Sources: Anthropic has begun weighing a new funding round at a $900B+ valuation, after previously resisting investor proposals at an $800B+ valuation (Bloomberg)
(Visit Techmeme dot com for the link and full context!)
they don’t offer a peer to peer marketplace
Instead they do long term pieces with neoclouds and then sell it piecemeal to startups
They’re compute resellers, arbitraging the price differentials from long term contracts to short term ones
Marketplace is misleading, they’re not Airbnb for compute
@AnjneyMidha@amppublic@CS153Systems two ideas:
1) khan academy for electricians/plumbers/etc
2) open sourcing more of the intricacies of the industry (for instance what would an open source semianalysis look like)
@matt_slotnick OpenAI would say no - the some web of complicated (and potentially selfish) deals woven by Sam, which is now motivating the board to consider others, is the same reason no one else is a good fit. Sam is the sole dealmaker to deliver the final package
I expect that Jensens back and forth in dwarkesh will have massive ripple effects on American geo-policy relating to chips
His emphatic defense of supplying chips to china, whether cogent from an economics standpoint or not, will confirm many existing biases in Washington
Technology founder leaders view China as a customer first and foremost, a foreign adversary as second if at all
Anthropic’s poor compute planning is the forcing function that’s motivating them to go after the application layer so aggressively
All indications are that Anthropic is compute constrained (1.5GW) for the foreseeable future. They are correcting for this (see contract with Coreweave announced last week), but it will take time
Until such time, they have to consistently squeeze out more top-line from their existing 1.5GW in order to maintain the current, insane growth trajectory (which they have to maintain for most optimal IPO outcome)
The most straightforward method to do this is to identify the highest commercial use/traction on their API users (internal growth compass) and go copy those products perfectly, which they are doing.
The closest comparable in recent memory would be Amazon creating generic versions of the best selling consumer goods on their platform and selling it under “Basics”
If you believe compute supply will grow at a slower rate than demand for Anthropic products, one thing will remain true, Anthropic will systematically go upstream until they have captured every dollar of margin being generated by others in the stack
The end state is eliminating their API access altogether and funnel all scarce compute towards their own branded products/services