Sonurosa

No knitting, no kleurenwiezen

[PsychoMath (hoe_math) @itispsychomath]

If you do something really well (like let's say you build a really cool sand castle at the beach), other people will notice and walk right up to you and try to be a part of what you're doing.

They didn't do a goddamn thing. They don't have any of the skills to do the goddamn thing. They just want credit and they want to be at the party.

If you let too many of them get close, they will mess with what you did and ruin it. They will try to build new parts on the sand castle, but they don't know how to do it and they will wreck it. They will climb on it like it's a real castle. If you tell them to stop ruining it, they'll say it's not yours anymore or it never was.

That's what it's like being white in a white country right now.

[I will not eat zee bugz @BFrankzetta]

Do you even history bro?

If Britain and France decided not to intervene on Poland's behalf, then Hitler focuses on going east like he originally planned.

No need to invade Denmark and Norway, if there is no fear of Britain cutting off iron ore from Sweden.

No need to invade Holland to get around the Maginot line if France isn't at war with you.

Hell without the fall of France, Italy might not have even joined the axis powers.

Japan doesn't move south to gobble up European colonies in southeast asia.

And yeah maybe eastern europe ends up under the heel of Nazi Germany instead of the Soviet Union, would that have been worse? Maybe, maybe not, that depends on a number of factors, and how those next 50 years actually play out.

Same with Asia, instead of a China ruled by Mao, you end up with one ruled by Imperial Japan. Is that worse? Maybe, then again maybe not.

But the idea that the world created by the allied powers getting involved in WW2 is objectively better then the world that would have been if we had not is is far from certain.

[Sonurosa @NgerNotagi]

@TheLaurenChen Thanks now that soundtrack is stuck in my head again

[Zoomer @ZoomerHistorian]

Non-Whites crumble in a second when they face organised opposition. The second the military or police puts their boot down the foreigners will crumble.

It’s one great bluff. They’re here, they get free shit, and they act up. They know they can get away with it. It’s a charade, but one day the music is going to stop.

Cut off the free shit and literally just enforce basic law and order and they’ll leave by the million. Stop acting like these people are rational Europeans.

[Sonurosa @NgerNotagi]

@sojaneska @badazn Quod erat demonstrandum

[Donny @DonnyServusDei]

He warned us.
He told us what would happen if we let the J8ws win.

But even still, despite the world refusing to see his truth, he still tried to save us.

Remember his sacrifice.
Honor his name
88✋

[Sonurosa @NgerNotagi]

@reddit_lies This what happens when you let jews influence your society.

[Andrew Torba @BasedTorba]

The people who have been destroying our country and attacking our people have names. They are not some stupid abstract idea like “the left” for one and secondly they are also on “the right.” When you look at these names an undeniable pattern emerges that cannot be ignored and must be named. To remove the weeds from the garden you must rip out the root.

[Beli Sloven @BeliSloven]

After WW2, the jews invented a new religion where:

Hitler is Satan,
White people are demons,
Holocaust is the original sin
And the destruction of the White Race is the final salvation.

[Sonurosa @NgerNotagi]

@OfficieelCA @PoempieBkp Geen zorgen. We hoeven gewoon te wachten tot de boomers er van tussen zijn. Hun hasbara heeft geen effect op de jongere generaties.

[Sonurosa @NgerNotagi]

@GiersbergenTom Het is essentieel de stichtende mythe van onze bezette cultuur staande te houden in tijden waarin het ontkiemende zaadje van etnonationalisme de status quo bedreigt.
Verwacht meer propaganda en repressie en zet geen stap terug.

[Uncommon Sense @Uncommonsince76]

America has now been perfectly crafted for Jewish rule.

They have the Mexicans to do manual labor.

They have the Whites as an administrative/ Soldier class to die in wars.

They have the Blacks pacified by wealth transfers, but also get to use their athletic ability to entertain the goyim.

They have the Indians to work as a perfect cheap IT labor class, but also to discriminate against White men in tech fields while “Increasing shareholder value.”

And the Jews get to sit on top. Blackmailing politicians with Epstein. Running the media and Hollywood. Rigging the stock market and giving each other government contracts for AI while everyone else serves them…

[Christian Heiens 🏛 @ChristianHeiens]

If White men do not start to become tribalistic in their politics, then we will be destroyed by everyone else who already has a tribe.

But this is incredibly difficult to do because we are similtaneously the only identity group in society that holds up liberal individualism, and we do it because we alone think individualism is natural and good.

But it's only natural and good inside a political order that has already settled the existential questions of who belongs and who decides? If you apply your liberal individualism in a universal fashion to those who weaponize your own worldview against you, then they will take power, push you out, and turn your own state against you.

All politics is identity politics. Take your own side. No one else will ever take it for you.

[John Doyle @JohnDoyle]

Normally young white men being the universally approved punching bag wouldn’t matter. We don’t really take it too personally that every group of people in the world has a bone to pick with us.

But the problem with the anti-gamer ad is that depicting us specifically as unemployed losers — rather than evil rapist Nazi serial killer abuser war criminal, you know, “the hits” — is going to hit a nerve because young white men actually aren’t doing well right now.

While literally every group of people aside from us has had their respective status explained by “socioeconomic factors,” which themselves are said to be our fault, we don’t get that luxury. Moreover, it actually isn’t our fault that we aren’t doing well.

We are actually the only group of people who are held down as a matter of policy and widely-held societal attitudes that we deserve it.

All we want is the boot taken off our necks. We would opt for blind aptitude tests for jobs/positions — no other group would. That tells you the whole story.

Everyone wants to stand atop their artificially created “status” and punch down, and it’s because they’re insecure in knowing that it is indeed artificial, and created precisely to produce the outcomes we’re seeing.

[Sonurosa @NgerNotagi]

@natanx63p @ironboyeu @RogerTheShame Tot wanneer we een echte fascistische partij hebben, zijn ze jammer genoeg de beste optie.

[Sonurosa @NgerNotagi]

@IM_Aeneas @InsaneFrog @RichardHanania They'd only when a white person shows some in-group preferences, though.
Every shitskin and kike alike knows we'd dominate if we regained our racial consciousness.

[Sonurosa @NgerNotagi]

@zami_anu @HollyGrayle Ah yes, deranged beyond any ability of cognitive reasoning.
'Immigrant' jews in Weimar Germany. 🥲
You're just using words without understanding their meaning.
I don't care for pigeon chess today.

[American Fascist News @AFI_MediaDept]

20 pieces of evidence for the Holocaust Hoax

1) The Missing "Führer Order":

After decades of searching every archive in Germany, the Allies, and Israel, no historian has ever produced a single written order from Hitler, Himmler, Heydrich, or any Nazi official authorizing the extermination of the Jews. Not one. If there was a state-sponsored plan to kill 6 million people, where is the paper trail? There are orders for deportation, for labor, and for resettment, but the "smoking gun" for genocide does not exist. The absence of this document proves the "Final Solution" was a lie; it was never a policy of extermination.

2) The Red Cross and 300,000 Death Toll:

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) visited the camps regularly and kept meticulous records. Their official reports state that the total number of deaths in all camps, from all causes including disease and the chaos of the war's end, was approximately 300,000 (or 271,000). They explicitly stated they found no evidence of a program of extermination. Why is the Red Cross data, which is neutral and verified, ignored in favor of inflated Soviet propaganda numbers?

3) David Irving and the Architectural Proof:

David Irving, before his persecution, analyzed the original blueprints for the Auschwitz crematoria. He proved that the structures labeled as "gas chambers" lacked the necessary ventilation systems to handle the lethal gas concentrations required to kill thousands of people. The blueprints show they were designed as morgues (Leichenkeller) with standard ventilation for corpses, not for human gassing. The physics of the buildings make the official story impossible.

4) The "6 Million" Number Existed Before the War:

The figure of 6 million is not a count of victims; it is a pre-war political slogan. It appeared in the New York Times and Jewish Daily Forward in 1919 and was repeated by Zionist leaders like Chaim Weitzman in the 1930s to lobby for a Jewish homeland. How can a death toll be predicted decades before the events allegedly happened? It was a fundraising and propaganda tool, not a demographic reality.

5) Zyklon B and the Delousing Reality:

Zyklon B was a pesticide used to kill lice, which carried tyus. The Germans were terrified of tyus epidemics spreading to the civilian population, so they used Zyklon B extensively in delousing chambers to save lives. The presence of Zyklon B residues in the walls is proof of sanitation efforts, not murder. Furthermore, the amount of Zyklon B required to kill humans in the quantities alleged would have created a toxic hazard for the SS guards themselves, which is physically implausible without specialized equipment that did not exist.

6) Auschwitz as an Industrial Labor Camp:

Auschwitz was a massive industrial complex working for I.G. Farben, Siemens, and other German corporations. The German war machine was desperate for labor. It makes zero economic or military sense to build a facility to kill workers when you are losing a war and need every able-bodied person. The camp records show prisoners were admitted for work, and many were released when no longer needed. The "death camp" label is a post-war invention to hide the fact that these were labor camps.

7) Impossible Survivor Testimonies:

Many "witness" accounts describe gas chambers that could kill thousands in minutes and then be ventilated instantly so the next group could be killed. Technical analysis shows that even with the most powerful ventilation systems of the 1940s, it would take days to clear the gas from a room. The stories also claim bodies were burned in open pits that could consume thousands of bodies a day without fuel. These are physical impossibilities that prove the testimonies were rehearsed lies.

8) The Fake Gas Chamber at Auschwitz I:

The "gas chamber" that millions of tourists are shown at Auschwitz I is a fraud. The Auschwitz museum itself admitted in 1972 (and in internal documents) that this room was built after the war by the Polish communist government as a memorial. It was never a gas chamber. If they have to fake the evidence for the tourists, what else is a lie? The fact that they maintain this deception proves they have no real evidence.

9) Demographic Data Contradicts the Genocide Claim:

Census data from 1933 to 1945 in Germany and occupied territories does not show a disappearance of 6 million people. In fact, Jewish population records show that many Jews emigrated or were displaced, but the numbers do not add up to 6 million missing. The Soviet Union refused to release census data for decades, and when they did, the numbers didn't match the genocide narrative. Where did these people go if they weren't killed? The math simply doesn't work.

10) Allied Propaganda and WWI Parallels:

The stories of "gas chambers" and "death camps" are identical to the propaganda used by the Allies during World War I, which claimed Germans were boiling people in fat and cutting off hands. Those stories were later admitted to be false. The "Holocaust" narrative is a repeat of this same tactic: demonizing the enemy with fabricated atrocities to justify war and post war punishment. It is a standard propaganda technique.

11) Tortured Confessions Are Invalid:

The "confessions" of camp commanders like Rudolf Höss were obtained after days of torture, sleep deprivation, and threats of extradition to the Soviet Union or Yugoslavia, where he would have been executed immediately. Höss himself stated in private letters that he was forced to sign false statements to stop the abuse. A confession obtained under torture is worthless in any court of law, yet it is the foundation of the entire genocide narrative.

12) No Forensic Evidence of Mass Murder:

Despite decades of searching by Polish, Soviet, and Jewish organizations, no mass graves containing millions of bodies have been found at Auschwitz or any other camp. Modern forensic technology, including ground-p penetrating radar and soil analysis, has found no evidence of the combustion of millions of bodies. The soil composition at the alleged sites does not match what would be expected from the burning of human remains on that scale.

13) The 300,000 Figure is the Only Verified Number:

The Internal Tracing Service and the Red Cross data are the only neutral, verified sources we have. They agree on a death toll of around 300,000, mostly from disease, malnutrition, and the chaos of the war's end. The 6 million figure is a political construct with no basis in reality. Why do we accept the inflated number when the only neutral data says otherwise?

14) The "Holocaust" as a Political Weapon:

The narrative of the Holocaust was created and maintained to justify the creation of the state of Israel, to secure billions in reparations from Germany, and to gain political leverage in the West. It is a "secular religion" that serves a political purpose. If you remove the political and financial incentives, the narrative collapses.

15) Liberation Films Show No Extermination:

When Allied troops liberated the camps, they filmed everything. These films show prisoners who were sick and malnourished due to the collapse of the German supply lines, but they do not show gas chambers, crematoria, or any evidence of systematic extermination. The prisoners were alive, which contradicts the idea that these were "death factories." The Allies used the suffering of the prisoners for propaganda, but the films do not support the genocide claim.

16) Soviet Propaganda and the "Death Camp" Myth:

The Soviet Union, which liberated Auschwitz, was a totalitarian regime that lied about everything, including the Katyn massacre, which they blamed on the Germans. Their reports on the camps were pure propaganda designed to justify their occupation of Eastern Europe and to demonize Germany. We should never have trusted Soviet reports, yet they are the primary source for the "death camp" narrative.

17) Laws Against Inquiry Prove the Lie:

If the Holocaust story was true, why do 18 countries have laws making it illegal to question it? You don't need prison sentences to protect historical facts. The fact that they jail people like David Irving, Ernst Zündel, and others for asking questions proves that the narrative cannot withstand open debate and scrutiny. Truth does not need censorship; only lies do.

18) Mistranslation of "Sonderbehandlung":

The term "Sonderbehandlung" (special treatment) in Nazi documents has been mistranslated and manipulated to mean "execution." In reality, it referred to a variety of administrative actions, including deportation, labor assignment, or release. Revisionist scholars have shown that the context of these documents does not support the interpretation of mass murder. It is a deliberate mistranslation to support the genocide narrative.

19) Jewish Organizations Admitted to Exaggeration:

Early in the war, some Jewish organizations spread exaggerated claims about gas chambers and death camps to pressure the Allies to intervene. These claims were never corrected after the war because they became too useful for political goals. The fact that the story was known to be exaggerated at the time, yet was maintained, proves it was a propaganda tool.

20) The Silence of the "Witnesses" and Fake Testimony:

Many supposed "witnesses" to gas chambers have been caught lying about their presence or their identity. When you remove the fake witnesses, the coerced testimony, and the propaganda, there is no one left to tell the story. The entire narrative relies on a handful of unreliable sources that have been debunked, yet the story persists because it serves a political purpose.

There are over 500 documented inconsistencies of the official story of the Holocaust. These are just a select few that are easily observed.

When one studies the Jew and his lies, one finds that the very foundation of his being is rooted in fanciful and deluded ideologies. He does not know how to do good because there is no good in him. The heart of the Jew is inconceivably evil and no man can hope to understand it. Only to rebuke it in its entirety.

Written by,

@HyperboreanMonk

American Fascist Imperium Writer

DISCLAIMER: the purpose of this article is to present factual historical information and educate the populace. Hate speech, harassment, and abuse are not endorsed nor condoned by this account or the writer of this article. All information presented for educational purposes only.

[Charlie Downes @cfdownes_]

The central principle of the Left in the 21st century is anti-Whiteness.

Whatever disagreements exist between its various factions, they all share one objective: to denigrate, undermine, and deconstruct White identity and culture.

The Right has nowhere near that level of ideological clarity. That, among other reasons, is why we keep losing.

To have any chance at turning things around, we must define clearly what we actually stand for. Like the Left, we must have a single non-negotiable central principle that drives all of our political activities and informs every one of our positions.

The answer, in my view, is simple: if the Left is anti-White, we must be pro-White. That’s the game they want to play, so let’s play it.

[Sonurosa @NgerNotagi]

@DelusionPosting His terms are acceptable.