Nick

[Nick @Nick140049]

@bjones306 @Masterhunter25 @robnoerr @RealCandaceO Yea, well, you dodged the numbered list of all of the valid arguments I made against the state's evidence earlier.

So, I guess, we'll call it "even."

[Nick @Nick140049]

@bjones306 @Masterhunter25 @robnoerr @RealCandaceO FYI, while you're assuming the "defense failed" in the preliminary hearings and they are "scared to go to trial."

The judge hasn't even made a ruling on the probable cause yet. To this point, probable cause has NOT been established! 🤣

You're so stupid. You probably didn't know

[Nick @Nick140049]

@bjones306 @Masterhunter25 @robnoerr @RealCandaceO The irony of the clip that you linked out of context, too. Is that the "overwhelming" evidence she is referencing is literally the UNDERWHELMING evidence for the state!
You know, the part that Andrew is terrified to have to defend against even a moderate level of scrutiny. 🤣

[Nick @Nick140049]

@bjones306 @Masterhunter25 @robnoerr @RealCandaceO I think she does not HAVE to have a "more sound theory" in order to not believe the state's claims.

I believe it is a fallacious argument to even assert that she does. One does not have to have a position of their own to perform an internal critique of an argument.

[Nick @Nick140049]

@bjones306 @Masterhunter25 @robnoerr @RealCandaceO She literally showed tracking for the Egyptian planes on flight radar. She showed the tactical crawl. She has shown evidence for every one of these small investigatory findings.

She has NEVER stated "the Egyptians killer Charlie" or "the military killed Charlie." Stop the lying

[Nick @Nick140049]

@bjones306 @Masterhunter25 @robnoerr @RealCandaceO "The best defense possible" isn't giving up their whole game in pre-trial hearings numb nuts.

[Nick @Nick140049]

@Masterhunter25 @bjones306 @robnoerr @RealCandaceO Yes, I am sure because this has literally all of the context removed! 🤣🤣 It is a bad faith clip to run damage control for you low IQ idiots who eat his slop up

[Nick @Nick140049]

@bjones306 @Masterhunter25 @robnoerr @RealCandaceO Charlie's death and the economy is "overwhelming" or anything of that nature. You are just conflating BS.

You're going to sit here and talk about the "tactical crawl" as if it isn't called that and then link a video of her showing the evidencethe military does in fact do it. 😂

[Nick @Nick140049]

@bjones306 @Masterhunter25 @robnoerr @RealCandaceO So if Candace is 99.9% sure Tyler didn't shoot Charlie because she doesn't believe the narrative. You're demanding that she prove a negative?

The other claims you talked about are minutia and she literally provided evidence for EVERY single one. She never said it resulted in

[Nick @Nick140049]

@bjones306 @Masterhunter25 @robnoerr @RealCandaceO defendant! Why not mandate the defense do as you are saying???? It's almost as if that isn't in the rules of criminal procedure because it would be a fucking STUPID thing to do!

[Nick @Nick140049]

@bjones306 @Masterhunter25 @robnoerr @RealCandaceO If it was such an important detail that the defense do their job and provide all arguments to even keep probable cause from being found. Why is that not the rule? You fucking stupid chud. They aren't required to do anything!
Why? The entire purpose of trial is to protect the

[Nick @Nick140049]

@bjones306 @Masterhunter25 @robnoerr @RealCandaceO She has never even come to a conclusion in her investigation to make a fact claim stupid.
Not once has she posted anything of the nature that the evidence is overwhelming Charlie was killed by ____" or anything of that nature.

[Nick @Nick140049]

@Agentx_yz @robnoerr @RealCandaceO Please, now post it again with the context. You all and your bad faith coward debate daddy will never do it though.

Candace could post out of context clips onf Andrew all day long! 🤣

[Nick @Nick140049]

@bjones306 @Masterhunter25 @robnoerr @RealCandaceO But the its not about "disproving the narrative" you fucking idiot!
It is about PROBABLE CAUSE! So what if they get the phone tossed for lack of verification and the judge still finds probable cause? Now, they've given up an argument and given the prosecution time to prepare.

[Nick @Nick140049]

@bjones306 @Masterhunter25 @robnoerr @RealCandaceO It's a terrible analogy. You're a moron though. So, i get why you think otherwise.
She didn't run from a single thing. Andrew CHALLENGED her! She had reasonable stipulations and he immediately countered as if he is somebody. Lmao
All day long he has been whining and not accepting

[Nick @Nick140049]

@AmericanGadfly2 @ulfzway @RealCandaceO No, his stipulations are plenty in every single thing he posts publicly. There is a new demand.

[Nick @Nick140049]

@bjones306 @Masterhunter25 @robnoerr @RealCandaceO I have to slow down for you. Since you are unable to connect the dots for yourself.

Why would the defense show their cards in a phase of the trial where the bar is extremely low and give the prosecution a chance to develop an argument for the actual jury trial? That is a FAILURE

[Nick @Nick140049]

@bjones306 @Masterhunter25 @robnoerr @RealCandaceO Again, you're not an Indian but you can still sit "Indian style." The fact you are still harping on this brain dead line of argument is absurdly pathetic.

[Nick @Nick140049]

@bjones306 @Masterhunter25 @robnoerr @RealCandaceO It's certainly not "overwhelming." Again, the reason you neglected to address any one of the 7 or 8 points you made that i dismatled earlier.

[Nick @Nick140049]

@bjones306 @Masterhunter25 @robnoerr @RealCandaceO Embarrassing to who? The guy embarrassing himself? 🤣

Think what you want. Again, I was correct. You pulled the clip and it verified EXACTLY what I said. She didn't claim he was military.