It’s no understatement to say that without him, there would be no @MLS.
Former Deputy Commissioner Mark Abbott's legacy as a builder will be recognized as he’s inducted into the National Soccer Hall of Fame in 2025. #NSHOF25
@CSElmendorf@salimfurth CT's ADU law (other shortcomings notwithstanding) is Model 2! See Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-2o ("at least one accessory apartment shall be allowed as of right on each lot that contains a single-family dwelling").
Amazing stuff: "I never expected to agree with the little socialist about anything, but Nick Abbot's (sic) right about our 'accessory apartment' ordinance — it's too restrictive"
https://t.co/svYj53oy0e
"Nick Abbott ... said he didn’t buy the arguments for historic preservation in this case ... 'The way to honor that history would be to build mixed-income housing, rather than preserving in amber housing that is no longer affordable to people.'" https://t.co/2I8Tb7aoLq
We must not close our doors to those who make our City thrive and approving the current proposal for 35 Crescent Street will ensure that we are providing critical workforce housing as well as community space for residents to utilize.
Read my op-ed here: https://t.co/CV94NpPrqU.
The good news: Greenwich's discriminatory policy will be superseded by state law in 2023.
The bad news: Greenwich is seeking to "opt out" to preserve its unlawful restrictions.
Hopeful news: If just 1/3 of its RTM votes against opting out on 9/18, its bad rules will go away.
Greenwich violates the Fair Housing Act in myriad ways, but its ADU ordinance—which facially discriminates based on age—is the most flagrant. My piece on this stupid, illegal policy and how to change it: https://t.co/PJER9rdvuh
@RickHills2 Interesting new hookto strike down owner-occupant restrictions – I personally found the ultra vires argument most compelling (used in NC, PA, and NJ), but DCC allows for broader challenges beyond zoning
The Greenwich "limited government and parental rights" group wants to stick it to the "globalists" by ... mandating ppl take public transit? Ok then @GreenwichRTC let's do it (and obviously require the same for private schools)! https://t.co/lmdsXGkdtt
Greenwich P&Z: We want housing diversity!
Builder: *proposes 456 townhomes*
P&Z: "When you talked about starter homes we had a vision of little back yards ... lower density – at least something not being attached"
https://t.co/9lpuWNLEvt
⬇️ + those remedies only matter if projects pencil with 30% affordable units (half at 60% AMI!), which is way higher than SF/NYC IZ reqs (and MA’s Chapter 40B). 8-30g only comes into play if you don’t have enough affordable units AND your market rate units are crazy expensive!
There seems to be consistent confusion about 8-30g. As @seanghio says here, there's no *requirement* that towns reach 10% designated affordable housing. IF towns hit that mark, they're exempt from court remedies offered to developers when affordable housing plans are denied
Greenwich: we can't approve new apartments because of the environment
Also Greenwich: approves 15,161 sq ft 1-fam home with:
🚗 14-car garage AND a "parking court"
🛣️ 36,404 sq ft INCREASE in impervious surface
🌳 175 removed trees
🌊 No access in 10-year storm event