@BasedMikeLee@RichardGrenell Sorry. This is rubbish. Ukraine gave up its nukes in exchange for security guarantees, from Russia & the US. The US looked the other way when Crimea was invaded: & Russia’s invasion showed its guarantees were worthless. The US is now siding w Putin to the disgust of the world.
@UAPUFO_Inv@BasedMikeLee Sadly you are spot on. Over in Europe we are filled with disgust at what America is becoming. Once a staunch ally it now appears to be siding with a dictator who is out to destroy the West, including America.
@cindi_marie10@WarMonitor3 US did not send what Ukr needed. Biden was unrealistically frightened of escalation. And US imposed restrictions on what Ukr could do w the weapons US did send. There was no way the US would fight a war under the restrictions they imposed on Ukr.
@igorsushko America is proving itself to be no longer an ally, so Europe must man up, seize the frozen Ru assets and use them to support Ukr. Now is not the time for hesitancy. Europe must now stand on its own feet and start cutting ties with America.
@eiversa1@LBC@ShelaghFogarty Trump is steadily turning the US into a pariah state. European nations are spurred by this and will combine to fund Ukr and their own defence against Ru. Listen to what Sweden, for example, has been saying.
@eiversa1@LBC@ShelaghFogarty Ukr has a good chance of winning. The Ru economy is on the verge of collapse and Ukr has already destroyed over 1/3 of the Ru oil industry. It needs the West to honour the promises it has made.
@LBC@ShelaghFogarty Trump forgets that under Putin’s orders Ru forces routinely and intentionally shell civilian infrastructure. They also shoot Ukr PoWs. Both are war crimes. By the very fact that his emissaries sit down with Ru Trump is legitimising those crimes. Future adversaries will take note.
@guyverhofstadt@TedUrchin It’s time Europe turned Trump down flat with a resounding No. Trump wouldn’t then dare to withdraw military support. He and the US would then be seen internationally as a pariah state, an untrustworthy partner and ally. He couldn’t risk that.
@RedBird74003923@BorisJohnson NATO is a defensive alliance. The fact that NATO countries are on Ru’s border is irrelevant; they are there to deter invasion. Putin doesn’t want them there because he wants to be able to invade unhindered.
@secretsqrl123 And Ukr is conserving manpower by using drones against infantry, very successfully too. And on top of that the Ru economy is collapsing.
@Supergoon231@bbcquestiontime Why do you say that? He’s right. If we do not support Ukr to expel Ru, Ru will take the whole of Ukr. Ru will then turn to the Baltic states. This is a repeat of the origins of WW2.
@bbcquestiontime He’s absolutely right. Also Putin has not stuck to any agreement he has signed regarding Ukr so why would he abide by any new negotiated settlement? He would use the space given by a settlement to rearm and would then try again.
@TuckerCarlson This is a stupid & ignorant comment. Zelensky was democratically elected. There has been no election since then as Ukr is at war and elections in wartime are illegal under their constitution as indeed they are in other countries for logical reasons e,g, how do troops vote?
@NOELreports The US should stop issuing fatuous advice. They’ve never had to fight a war under the restrictions they have imposed on Ukr. Reducing the recruitment age means the potential loss of the very generation needed to rebuild Ukr later.
@NOELreports It’s time the US stopped giving fatuous advice. They’ve never had to fight a war under the restrictions that they’ve imposed on Ukr. Nor have they ever had to repel an invader from their homeland.