Nick

Man of god. Hopelessly white-pilled. Isiah 6:8

[Nick @Nick_FSF]

@dataguy601 @warpaint1317 Just bait an FBI agent into “radicalizing” you and you get one for free 😁

[Nick @Nick_FSF]

@RepJackKimble I had never heard your name until this post. You’re already one of my most hated congressmen. I hope this is satire. Otherwise, you’re seriously disconnected from the average American to the extent you’re metaphorically spitting in their faces.

[Nick @Nick_FSF]

@IcepickAL @Officer_Stoopz @LASHYBILLS The US Supreme Court ruled he doesn’t have to explain shit. You just don’t like facts.

[Nick @Nick_FSF]

@SchmeatPacking @Mukamukasector @onlyrodrick @LASHYBILLS Dog, he’s saying quora is cited but the person on quora cited the US Supreme Court lmao you’re too stupid to comprehend it

[Nick @Nick_FSF]

@waximij @_WWjayD @MulbearA @LASHYBILLS Lmao it was a legal arrest. Your opinion doesn’t change that fact. Stay mad 😂

[Nick @Nick_FSF]

@FanProst760 @LASHYBILLS Brinks will not publish their internal policy but I can guarantee you it doesn’t tell their drivers to commit crime. That would make them SERIOUSLY liable for this kind of situation. Police can still refuse to relocate to a secure site.

[Nick @Nick_FSF]

@_WWjayD @MulbearA @LASHYBILLS The law is an interest of mine. I find the debate fun. The criminal case was dismissed, but there is following civil law which still interests me.

[Nick @Nick_FSF]

@Jaysonsson1 @LASHYBILLS He will more than likely have a case against the company civilly under the pretense the policy was too vague or what not. My point overall is the arrest is legal. They do get federal contracts which lead me to believe the policy complies with the law tho. 🤷🏻‍♂️

[Nick @Nick_FSF]

@MulbearA @LASHYBILLS Probably the marked patrol vehicle and uniform. I’m sure his dispatch contacted theirs and verified. Still doesn’t excuse refusal to comply with the law.

[Nick @Nick_FSF]

@Snarkage1 @LASHYBILLS No, actually it doesn’t. Brinks will not publish their internal policies, but they would be incredibly screwed with liability if they ordered their drivers to refuse lawful commands. They are more than likely instructed to TRY to relocate. Police can refuse.

[Nick @Nick_FSF]

@onlyrodrick @LASHYBILLS If the police tell you no and to exit the vehicle, you’re still required to exit the vehicle.

[Nick @Nick_FSF]

@DoeSparkle Being homeless is not illegal. You just don’t have a right to camp out on someone else’s property. If you end up homeless, it’s on you. The rest of society should not be made to pay for your poor decisions in life. Accountability is a foreign concept to you.

[Nick @Nick_FSF]

@VTBuckeyes @SeeRacists Look everyone! The expert on law enforcement tactics is here to settle the argument once and for all! Thank you sir! We don’t deserve to be in the presence of your colossal intelligence!

[Nick @Nick_FSF]

@gotrice2024 Law enforcement can technically follow you for as long as they want if you’ve already committed an infraction in their jurisdiction. If you haven’t then they can’t stop you for an infraction committed in another jurisdiction. Entrapment doesn’t apply at all

[Nick @Nick_FSF]

@NoLieWithBTC This is not accurate. You’re lying.

[Nick @Nick_FSF]

@RepMarkPocan This is not accurate at all. You’re lying to your constituents. You’re evil.

[Nick @Nick_FSF]

@philthatremains @DrewPavlou @philthatremains , as someone who is also liberty minded, thank you for your recent truth speaking about law enforcement. I got into the profession because of my principled stance on the constitution and was skeptical. Thanks for defending good policing 🤘🏻

[Nick @Nick_FSF]

@David_J_Bier It’s called hot or fresh pursuit. You clearly don’t understand the law so keep your moronic opinion to yourself.