I am not an important person to anyone other than my close family (I hope) and a small number of friends. So, I have no doubt that you will not be interested in what I have to say, but I am going to tell you anyway.
You’re a bright bloke, so you must realise this post of yours is nonsense.
If you accept as a matter of principle that the Nation State exists and does so for good reason then the concept of a border and controlling who can and cannot cross it is intrinsic
It thus isn’t ‘hate’ to say that there should be a policy that prevents people crossing that border illegally (i.e. not in accordance with reasonable legal principles) and it is not ‘hate’ to have a policy that people with a criminal history should either be prevented from entering or be repatriated. This is the opposite of hate, it is love for your own country and your own citizens who are entitled to receive protection from the state.
The Democratic Party thinks that a man can be a woman and lesbian, that real lesbians are bigots if they don’t accept such a man into their dating pool, that male offenders with special ‘feelz’ should be entitled to be placed in the female prison estate even if their crime is rape, that women’s sporting categories should be open to failed male athletes, that some men should be entitled to enter women’s safe spaces such as locker rooms where women and teenage/pre-pubescent girls are naked, that ‘woman’ is not representative of a sex-class but of an identity that anyone can perform.
It isn’t hate to say that these policies and the ideological cess-pit of postmodernism are wrong because they are intrinsically misogynistic and homophobic.
Discrimination is not only not always wrong, it is absolutely a central process to human functioning. We discriminate in our decision making every day, and rightly so. What is required is that discrimination should be outlawed where it relates to specific characteristics and has direct impact. (By way of example, I am going to discriminate against a paedophile every time he applies for a job as my babysitter.)
Inclusion is a bizarre concept. All definitions are at the same time exclusive and inclusive, otherwise they are not definitions. Womanhood should be inclusive of adult females and exclude anyone male. It isn’t ‘hate’ to say so. On the contrary, it is love, a love for the reality of sex.
Dem voters think Hamas are cuddly little freedom-fighters rather than the vicious jihadist butchers that they are. It isn’t ’hate’ to say that fundamentalist Islamists are not the friends of Western style democracy.
”Progressive” used to be a label one could attach to people and policies that put fairness first, now it is a term that signifies regression.
@krassenstein@MishGEA The media put out so much shit, be it whatever hymn sheet they are singing from.
All it does is create division and you get this type of tribalism. Not new, just on steroids due to Social media.
A fair and balanced media that encourages individual thinking…. Would create……
@PiersUncensored@piersmorgan@TalkTV Surely you could do better and tell us all that it doesn’t really matter who the figurehead on the stem is.
Who’s at the helm……..
@SkyNews@SholaMos1 If I’d have said to this woman 2 months ago that black police officers were nothing but gatekeepers, she have told me I’m a racist white supremacist that considered black police officers to be token police officers. You really can’t win against people who are always right.
@linda_dwan I remember my uncle frying eggs in the microwave. He used a little oil but it was essential to pierce the yolk a few times with a pin or sewing needle to stop it rupturing… maybe that’s the trick…
@piersmorgan@Cristiano You were wrong about Auba, and I think you should pipe down on this particular subject as well. You showed a complete lack of respect to your own manager on the latter. Now you’re doing the same to TH.