american in south africa • photo nerd • ma classical philology, univ. of basel • forensic imaging • machine vision • optimizing pixels for truth 🤙 surf's up
@WokeMitt I'm mostly convinced the White House interns really do embed it in the messaging now and then, but at some point we have to ask: when does the Twitter pattern recognition just get corny?
@EddieTopG Absolutely. It's gotta be about the most obscure reference in there, so good catch. I knew Hank when I was a kid because he was a family friend (for some reason).
Katchanovski mischaracterizes the verdict. It doesn’t prove a Maidan sniper false flag, just that SBU officers were unproven culprits, with shots possibly from occupied areas. This is speculation, not the settled truth you imply. Please try running the original Ukrainian language court ruling through Google Translate, or to Grok. This narrative that there's now some judicial validation of the Euromaidan false flag theory is dead wrong:
https://t.co/wSHWTK3kSk
If you feed Grok the original court ruling in question (it's in Ukrainian of course), it shows Dr. Katchanovski fairly seriously misrepresents it. Without giving Grok direct access to the primary source, it seems to rely on his account in formulating its answer.
https://t.co/q4JOgOGxVG
@aaronjmate Aaron, please stop sharing Dr. Katchanovski's work if you're not going to make even a minimal effort to verify it. He links to the Ukrainian court opinion in question, which can easily be machine translated, and grossly misrepresents it in this rambling tweet.
Thank you. This is some of the laziest sneakiness Dr. K has pulled. He's so confident his followers won't bother doing a quick machine translation of the court opinion he actually links to that he knows he can twist it however he wants.