>frogan went from being in default judgment to winning the lawsuit
When you fight with someone you've declared to be a clown, the last thing you want to do is to lose.
@VoltageEchidna@TemplarsVoice I don't think "lolisho" is equivalent to CSEM because its production doesn't necessitate harming real children.
It's most certainly pedophilic and that's clearly reflected in the communities that form around that content.
@VoltageEchidna@MommaOcco@TemplarsVoice I'm simply telling MommaOcco how he can check if he's been platforming a fake lawyer for the past 2 years.
It's also how I can confirm if she's complicit in the fraud or just stupid.
@VoltageEchidna@MommaOcco@TemplarsVoice I do use OSINT tools and techniques to find information about people. Sometimes that involves finding an anonymous person's real identity.
While it's colloquially called "Finding someone's dox", doxing someone involves republishing that info.
That's not something I do.
@TemplarsVoice As a gesture of good faith, even in the deepest of depths she denied being attracted to real children, but there's a lot of very questionable stuff she posted here.
@TemplarsVoice Those are very interesting questions, Templar.
I've got many others, but something I'm deeply curious about is this:
why would a lawyer sign up for a forum that has a MAP support section and then post onto it?
In the sign up form it's referred to as "Pedophilia talk".
@MommaOcco@TemplarsVoice I already know the answer, I'm just curious if she'll tell you.
One of the example cases she linked to demonstrate how summary judgement in defamation works in the US was "Blake and Seymour V Fox".
That's a case from the UK.
@MommaOcco@TemplarsVoice Also, I'm curious: where did Eva post this instance of her going "full lawtism"?
Because it definitely didn't happen on Twitter as she claims here.