@NinaKis17 Euer Englisch muss echt grottenschlecht sein, denn in dem Video wird nichts über den geistigen Zustand von Biden gesagt es wir nicht mal erwähnt
@Petesvnfdv@floh_alma@AufsassigeNEWS Wo wo kommen bitte deine Zahlen würde mich sehr interessieren und klar wird das von deutschen Steuergelder bezahlt wer den auch sonst ?
Weir brauchen Arbeiter oder wir schaffen das rentensystem ab ca. 2030 ab wenn du das möchtest bitte
@mjsharkattack@GerkenSascha@Alice_Weidel Hm aber hat sich herausgestellt da wo menschen mehr mit Flüchtlinge in kontakt kommen gibt es weniger ausländerfeindlichkeit
@Tascharoe Hey Could we have a littel longer Q&A ?
5 Questionts are nit rly that much i understand that your guyse also having a limited working time
Maby an extra stream for something like that ?
Would be rly nice
@DuneAwakening Could we have a proper Q&A session? Five questions are really not sufficient, especially when one of them is simply about whether something can be petted
@Bob_theCrusader@spiritofhawaii1@AndreasPrucha@PeterSweden7 He’s attacked judges and labeled the press “enemies of the people,” refused to accept election results, and encouraged the Jan 6 mob with “fight like hell.” He pardoned loyal allies who broke the law and punished officials who followed it.
@Bob_theCrusader@spiritofhawaii1@AndreasPrucha@PeterSweden7 Although Trump may speak about limiting government bureaucracy, his actions undermining democratic norms, attacking independent institutions, and promoting personal loyalty over law indicate an attempt to strengthen his own power rather than uphold democratic checks and balances.
@Sandra934243167@spiritofhawaii1@AndreasPrucha@PeterSweden7 Und das werden Gerichte anhand von dem über 1000 Seiten langen Dokument sicherlich prüfen, so wie es auch schon bei den Vedacht der Fall gewesen ist wo die Kläger jedes Mal verloren haben
@Bob_theCrusader@spiritofhawaii1@AndreasPrucha@PeterSweden7 There was a time when only elections mattered and parties could do whatever they wanted. It ended in the death of over 6 million people. From that, we learned we must not allow any parties that discriminate against, oppress, or even want to kill people of different origins.
@Bob_theCrusader@spiritofhawaii1@AndreasPrucha@PeterSweden7 No political party has power over the Office for the Protection of the Constitution, just as no party has power over the courts, which review such findings and evidence. Therefore, your statement is incorrect and makes no sense in this context.
@Bob_theCrusader@spiritofhawaii1@AndreasPrucha@PeterSweden7 No, the Office for the Protection of the Constitution operates independently of politics. Its purpose is to observe anything that aims to abolish the constitution or acts against it. In fact, it doesn't do more than that — it is merely an organization that observes, nothing more.
@spiritofhawaii1@AndreasPrucha@PeterSweden7 Es werden auch weiterhin Beweise gesammelt solange die Partei existiert, die Beweise welche sie bisher haben reichen aber bereits für die Einstufung
@spiritofhawaii1@AndreasPrucha@PeterSweden7 Währe mir neu wenn man beu laufenden Ermittlungen Beweise rausrücken wo offensichtlich wird wie man an die Beweise kommt aber dafür gibt es Gerichte welche diese Dokumente prüft und auch prüft ob das Resultat korrekt ist
@DarthRaven777@Satoshiisreal@PeterSweden7 Because the German Office for the Protection of the Constitution examines such matters thoroughly to prevent a situation like in the Nazi era, the process takes time. A significant body of evidence is also relevant. The agency prepared a 1,000-page document on this.