YASIN MALIK KI PREM KAHANI
Why do our national TV channels find only ONE demon in the whole story—Yasin Malik? What about the high profile Indian costume designers who designed and decorated him as a "model of revolution"? Hasn't he named everyone of them in his 85-page affidavit? Why doesn't anybody question the way they conveniently created the stereotypes of "hardliners" and "moderates" and thus a State justification to his entire existence, acceptance and glorification?
Don't we see the photographs of Malik's hugs and meeting with the top Indian politicians, PMs, CMs, Chiefs? Didn't they, from 1994 to 2019, make a meeting, friendship or dinner with Malik as a State statement of fashion and status? Didn't we see two J&K Chief Ministers virtually bowing to Malik at the remembrance ceremony of Kashmir editors Sonaullah Bhat Aftab and Sofi Ghulam Mohammad at SKICC? Wasn't someone holding status equal to that of the Chief Justice of India serving Wazwan to guests at Malik’s Waleema in Srinagar? Wasn't Malik permitted, encouraged and facilitated to visit Kashmir's schools and colleges, collect 1 million signatures to his 'resolution', collect and carry ₹1 crore in cash from Srinagar to Rawalpindi for the earth quake victims? Did anybody arrest or ask him a question over his dharna with Hafiz Saeed in Pakistan? Did anybody question CBI how it slept over a stay of J&K High Court on the Indian Air Force killings and Rubaiya Sayeed kidnapping cases from April 2009 to April 2019? Who created him as a 'Parallel State" in Kashmir? Who permitted, funded and facilitated dozens of his world tours and lectures on Kashmir's "Azadi", including his marriage and visits in Pakistan? Didn't we see an Indian Prime Minister hugging Yasin Malik but humiliating the 24 Wandhama massacre victims — Kashmiri Pandit men, women and children— by inaugurating the winter games at Gulmarg on 28 January 1998 while the cremation was happening in Ganderbal?
If Malik and his JKLF terrorists have killed Sarla Bhat once [that's still inconclusive in trial], his patrons and promoters in the Indian system have killed her a hundred times. Shame on the channels who conveniently see only one Rakshas in the whole story and do not unmask them all, one by one!
Mohammad Yasin Malik’s affidavit reported in media, particularly his decision not to contest the case further and seek extreme penalty, while maintaining his innocence is very concerning. It calls for serious reflection on commitments made to him and reinforces the need for due process, fairness and a humane approach.
the same gk that once used to lick the boots of yasin malik, and on whose khairaat this agency became so big, is now manipulating the narrative. just remember: everything is watched, everything is remembered. you think you’ll get away with it? you won’t.
@shraakpuchh@IvanMegatron ya tala kar chuape zan chukh che khabar kus zok, “oo he will hanged when this that”, when you don’t understand the bigger propaganda behind it, don’t speak their words for them
@IvanMegatron@shraakpuchh they watch our sentiments and gauge how people react to the idea of him being hanged. when we start saying it ourselves, we’re only making it easier for them to believe that the ground is already prepared. don’t normalize or speak their intentions into existence
Yasin Malik has nothing to contest in the Sarla Bhat case. It is a foolproof 737 page chargesheet filed by @SIAJKPolice. Successive governments failed to deliver justice to Sarla Bhat for 36 years. The BJP government has finally ensured the case moves forward. Justice will be done.
Listen to the debate on @republic.