@NatetheLawyer Any sane individual's self preservation mechanism has them increasing distance from an armed opponent. His brain was not functioning here.
@Cernovich It's the start of the income tax all over again. We don't have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem combined with an over-reach problem.
I see no viable path forward for socialized systems w/out Ai. Unclear in the surgical realm for now. ML on vast datasets has no human analog. A doctor cannot compete against a machine that can look at entire histories (inc family/genetics), drugs, other current statistical trends, etc..., especially on edge cases.
Humans will watch the ai, but eventually the ai will watch the humans. It's inevitable.
@TheRealSeanHart@NatetheLawyer It's really just that simple. Do not close on an armed opponent, repeatedly. Had he not done that, he'd be alive and the same justice system would be sorting out the facts of who's right or wrong. Now that's still going on but he's not here to share his side.
You don't need audio, though it may be pertinent to the inciting incident. What did he think he would benefit from closing the distance vs an armed opponent? Basic math here. She kept backing away, he kept coming closer. That's some basic FA and FO. A reasonable person would put some distance and obstacles between them and the armed opponent keeping LEOs apprised of the situation.
Yeah, dumb move on his part. I've had several instances where a firearm was produced and the aggressor backed down. For most rational people when the variables change, rewards become consequences, the situation ends faster than it started. MOST self defense situations with firearms don't even end with shots fired -- and certainly don't end up in some magic database.
He had plenty of opportunity to not engage, yet continued to close distance. She kept backing up as well. That snapshot in time says clean shoot. Backing up isn't wise, you can trip over something and the laws are such for the good states where you don't have to take a risk of falling over. He didn't lose his life over a parking spot, he lost his life over being hostile and aggressing against someone with a firearm.
@NatetheLawyer Full vid? Video is an imperfect lens of a moment in time. 3rd party story telling and edited video is narrative crafting. That parking job should be a crime.
@Timcast It's not even that, there's no struggle / character building. They just show up and be like "I'm a bad bitch". No, you're just a shitty movie.
@Cernovich It's a distraction. Everything is always everyone else's fault -- In truth the fault resides squarely on the politician who's pushing the BS. It's never the fault of those funneling taxpayer funds into their buddies pockets.
@Carie4USA@Perpetualmaniac Yeah, It'd take an unorthodox route for these fools. Destroy what they value. There's a movie - unthinkable - sometimes it takes monsters to fight monsters.
@beffjezos Imagine what happens when learn just how much freshwater farming exports consume! It costs the same amount of water to make 1 almond as it does to generate ~250,000 tokens.
@MajkelTheWizard@JayzTwoCents That's not how it works. There's zero reason to create a liability when you're printing money. The only thing that should be realistically looked at is clawing back taxpayer funds regarding onshoring in the US around TSMC/Intel/Nvidia/Micron/etc....