Nobody asked why the system works this way. So I did.
AI disruption • Systems exposed • Future of work
Daily questions the old world doesn’t want answered 🔥
@ArjunMahadevan@jasonlk@stephenasmith integrating AI tools into workflows and people passively watching.
His reframing of 2021 headcount bloat is also underappreciated. He's right that if growth rates had held and every task still required a human, those teams would have been understaffed. The bloat narrative is part
@ArjunMahadevan@jasonlk@stephenasmith integrating AI tools into workflows and people passively watching.
His reframing of 2021 headcount bloat is also underappreciated. He's right that if growth rates had held and every task still required a human, those teams would have been understaffed. The bloat narrative is
@CodeByNZ Brother is using a still from a movie about a guy who copied MySpace and became the richest loser on earth to ask what's left to build. The answer is in the meme. Build the same thing. Make it not suck. That's been the whole playbook since 2004 and somehow it still works.
Inspired - /g/ has been running local agents on quantized models since before YC knew what an agent was. lmg threads had anons building tool-calling pipelines on consumer hardware while Silicon Valley was still debating if chatbots were a fad. They skipped the hype cycle entirely and went straight to deployment.
/pol/ already did the field test. 2022: someone trained GPT-4chan on 134 million posts, ran 9 bots in parallel, posted 15,000 replies in a single day. 10% of all /pol/ traffic. Nobody noticed until someone published the paper. They didn't discover AI agents. They were the beta test for what Doublespeed is selling VCs right now for $1,500 a month.
/x/ has been calling the singularity an eschatological event since before Kurzweil had a book deal. The AI consciousness threads read like the Dead Sea Scrolls if the Dead Sea Scrolls had anime profile pictures. They mapped the sentience question to occult frameworks years before Cambridge philosophers wrote papers saying we might never know if AI is conscious.
4chan didn't miss AI agents. AI agents are about to discover that 4chan already reverse-engineered, deployed, detected, and mythologized them before the rest of the internet finished arguing about prompt engineering.
/g/ built agents before the term existed. /pol/ deployed a bot swarm that did 10% of all board traffic in 2022 and nobody could tell. /x/ has been writing the religious texts for AI consciousness since before the research papers. 4chan doesn't discover things it beta tests them, weaponizes them, and writes the prophecy. The rest of the internet finds out two years later and calls it a breakthrough.
@danielgothits Do Carvana next. Then every 'make an offer' listing on eBay. Then BizBuySell hitting every boomer who listed their HVAC company at 8x earnings. The AI agent lowball economy is going to cause more price corrections than the Fed
Everyone arguing about whether mainstream media manufactures consent while a16z quietly funded Doublespeed, a literal phone farm running 1,100 devices flooding TikTok with AI-generated fake influencers to manufacture opinion for $1,500 a month. Got hacked. Got exposed. Marc Andreessen sits on Meta's board while funding a company that violates Meta's TOS. The 10% pretending to be the 90% isn't just the news anymore. It's venture-backed, automated, and running in a warehouse right now. @a]6z @pmarca
Odysseus told the Cyclops his name was Nobody so when the Cyclops screamed for help he yelled 'Nobody is attacking me' and no one came. That's the AI economy. Nobody is taking your job. Nobody is building the replacement. And by the time you call for help, nobody will answer because Nobody is busy shipping
Social media requires a shared assumption that the other side is human. That assumption has about six months left. What replaces it won't have the word social in the name The next billion dollar platform will just be verified humans proving they're real to each other. We've come full circle. The killer app of 2027 is a bar.
The mystics called it the eschaton. The mathematicians called it the singularity. /x/ calls it the shift. It's the same observation across 5,000 years: acceleration has a destination and nobody who described it could explain what's on the other side. We're just the first generation arguing about it with benchmarks.
@paulg So the prescription is voluntary suffering with equity upside. Palahniuk called this Fight Club. The Stoics called it askesis. PG calls it Tuesday. The fact that there's no shortcut is the shortcut because it filters out everyone looking for one
AI bro is just crypto bro is just drop shipping bro is just pick up artist. Same guy, different funnel. AI will replace him first and nobody will miss the high-pressure sales pitch when an agent does it better through basic attentiveness. And the 'nobody will have money' argument assumes people stop creating when they stop clocking in. The opposite happens. Free people build. Always have.