hype looks ugly
the market looks ugly
i will reiterate to you my simple plan:
> if $hype under $25; dca hype
> if hype over $25; dca $btc
i follow this dca plan with all spare savings dollars i have after paying living expenses
get paid, pay living expenses, dca $hype or $btc
will continue as long as the bear market lasts
remember what they say
'fortunes are built in the bear market'
zoom out
@Bitcoin_Teddy Well... perhaps the problem is exactly that, that we should try to purely analyse the market manipulation.
But instead, 99% of traders use the same conventional trading systems that manipulation trades against.
Maybe that's the key. This was projected 1 month in advance 👍
Integrity has always been one of Hyperliquid's core values.
The house of all finance must be credibly neutral. This means no private investors, no market maker deals, and no protocol fees to any company.
The initial state of any blockchain is a crucial part of its story that can never be erased. The original ethos of Bitcoin was a permissionless network accessible to all. Hyperliquid's genesis distribution followed this spirit, going entirely to early users with core contributors excluded. The full distribution is verifiable onchain without obfuscation.
This principle of fairness frustrates a few users and builders who are used to special treatment. It means that Labs has zero tolerance for team members with integrity yellow flags. It means we do things the hard way as a community. But the world deserves a financial system owned by the people, where fairness to all users is in the DNA. Nothing else is worth building.
i rather invest in founder that focus on building than founder who busy tweeting its competitor. we alr saw @vnovakovski do this a couple times to hyperliquid. i'm here not to debating which one is the best as i think both dexes have their own uniqueness, ----
although so many ppl alr assumed that $hype from AF won't be circulated anymore, this new burning mechanism shows that jeff and the team aren't greedy and building to make an impact to crypto world. this is the type of founder u wanna invest in
HYPE in the Assistance Fund system address of 0xfefefefefefefefefefefefefefefefefefefefe has been formally recognized as burned.
The governance vote was based on stake-weighted consensus, with 85% of stake voting for burning, 7% against, and 8% abstaining.
HYPE in the Assistance Fund system address of 0xfefefefefefefefefefefefefefefefefefefefe has been formally recognized as burned.
The governance vote was based on stake-weighted consensus, with 85% of stake voting for burning, 7% against, and 8% abstaining.
Fun fact (after scrapping some data)
Over the last 365 days
- Jeff has mentioned “lighter” or “lit” a total of zero times
- Vlad has mentioned “Hyperliquid” or “hype” a total of 503 times
(This includes interviews, replies and posts)
i rather invest in founder that focus on building than founder who busy tweeting its competitor. we alr saw @vnovakovski do this a couple times to hyperliquid. i'm here not to debating which one is the best as i think both dexes have their own uniqueness, ----
i rather invest in founder that focus on building than founder who busy tweeting its competitor. we alr saw @vnovakovski do this a couple times to hyperliquid. i'm here not to debating which one is the best as i think both dexes have their own uniqueness, ----
Seems we have moved from "first they ignore you" to "then they fight you" in the FUD cycle.
Not sure if these guys know ZK proofs work or read the whitepaper, but let's see what new attack they come back with once the circuits are public this week.
https://t.co/mCX6Pppnvx