#Recucklicans A useless piece of dogshit characterized by having the spine of a jellyfish, bought and paid for by the jews, pharma, pedophiles or any combination of the three. Liars, generally guilty of treason, no longer of or for the people.
@Bungie@BNGServerStatus Having such a good time pissing "teammates" off in trials. Tired of carrying pos scrub fucks. Now I'm just doing it for fun. Already been to the lighthouse twice today. Don't work as a team, when it comes to match point, i'm jumping off the map every time. Loving the hate mail.
Investigate circadian rhythm disruption
Explore blue light filter efficacy
Hundreds, thousands? 10's of 1000's?
Thought for 4s
In short: Hundreds captures the relevant literature bestโplenty for mechanisms in controlled settings, but not an overwhelming "thousands" of damage-confirming studies, especially for everyday human exposure. If you're concerned, focus on practical steps like screen breaks and blue-light reduction for comfort/sleep rather than proven structural damage.Hundreds of relevant studies overall, not thousands or tens of thousands.mdpi.comA 2023 comprehensive review screened 4,237 initial articles (spanning 1920โ2023) on blue light in relation to vision and ocular structures (cornea, lens, retina, etc.). It included 95 relevant studies after filtering. These show exponential growth in research over decades, especially recent ones, but the selected ones focus on associations with eye effects rather than all proving damage.mdpi.comBreakdown by TypeNo source tallies them in the thousands specifically for "damage." Animal and in vitro/lab studies (showing mechanisms of potential damage): These form the bulk of the evidence for photochemical harm (ROS generation, oxidative stress, retinal cell death). Reviews frequently describe "a large number" or "relatively many" such studies on rats, mice, primates, cell cultures, etc., under high-intensity/prolonged exposures. Individual reviews cite dozens (e.g., tables referencing 10โ20+ specific works on retinal injury).pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov +1 Human studies (direct damage from typical exposures like screens/LEDs): Far fewer and mostly inconclusive or negative for permanent harm. Systematic/scoping reviews often include only a handful to dozens (e.g., one scoping review had 37 articles meeting criteria, with just 5 highly relevant for digital blue light effects; others note gaps in in vivo human retinal data).avehjournal.orgBroader PubMed or database searches for "blue light retinal damage" or "phototoxicity" would yield thousands of hits when including related terms (e.g., mechanisms, reviews, sunlight studies), but the core body of original research demonstrating actual damage (mostly preclinical) is in the low-to-mid hundreds range across decades.mdpi.comKey Caveats on Scale and RelevanceMany studies reuse similar models or build incrementally, so the total unique evidence base isn't vast. Lab conditions (intense, acute exposures) differ greatly from real-world device use, limiting direct applicability to humans. Major bodies (e.g., AAO) and reviews emphasize no strong evidence of retinal damage from normal screen/LED exposure.pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govGrowth is recent due to LED/digital device concerns, but long-term human epidemiological data remains limited.
@Bungie@BNGServerStatus Just wanted to let you know I most sincerely hope you watch your children burn to death slowly shortly after watching them be gang raped. The fact that you have chosen to do nothing, maliciously, about the subhuman cheaters means that you are even more subhuman than them, and for that, I don't want you to breed.
CDC SLAMMED WITH FEDERAL LAWSUIT FOR OPERATING ILLEGAL 72-DOSE CHILDHOOD VACCINATION PROGRAM
NEVER tested for cumulative safety.
NEVER filed the legally-required safety reports.
This lawsuit could DISMANTLE the CDCโs unlawful vaccine regime that has poisoned the nation.
@Bungie@BNGServerStatus It should absolutely be a paying job to hunt down hack fags like Waluffy#1903, who is telling you in his tag that he's a walling faggot, Dinosaur845290#3241, and cut their throats.
๐จThe LARGEST human ivermectin cancer study EVER conducted found 84% of cancer patients declared COMPLETE REMISSION, TUMOR SHRINKAGE, or HALTED TUMOR GROWTH.
Our study is now PEER-REVIEWED and PUBLISHED by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.
The tide is turning.
Hello Mr. Hunter Biden,
You're getting six-digit likes on every post lately. I don't have any hope to ratio you or whatever through traditional "Hello" means.
But for those uninitiated, those who are captivated by your fake-humble persona obviously PR-engineered to capture unsuspecting disaffected Republicans:
You are not some humility, witty guy turning over a new leaf. You are the ultimate proof of nepotism, everything that the so-called "Epstein Class" is supposed to represent.
Let me explain - off the top of my head.
You were a board member of USGLC. U.S. Global Leadership Coalition. The most powerful NGO that nobody's ever heard of. Last year, I documented in several threads, how Liz Schrayer, USGLC lead, took credit for ramming through a 90 billion dollar bill for Ukraine in 2024, even as @mattvanswol demonstrated that Western North Carolina got zero help in the aftermath of Hurricane Helene because FEMA threw up their hands and said they ran out of funds.
USGLC, arguably, is the most powerful NGO that nobody has ever heard of. It includes a bunch of corporations, a bunch of nonprofit leads, and ... for some magical reason, I documented, extensively, linked, that Liz Schrayer started pursuing you in 2012. During the Obama years, when you were Biden's son. Are you a former Secretary of State? No. Are you a CEO of a Fortune 500 company? No. That puts you below the average USGLC board member, by a good tier.
So what DID get you on USGLC? The only reason: that you were the son of a sitting Vice President known for corruption, and you yourself were known for corruption.
You are not "folksy." You are the worst of the worst of the elite. Most of the elite, at least, get their credentials through Georgetown/George Washington/Harvard Kennedy. You got yours purely on nepotism. Any photographs you have of yourself at motels is proof that you are so incompetent that you waste all your money, not that you come from humble beginnings. Because others like @MarcoPolo501c3 have thoroughly documented that you benefited a great deal from your nepotism.
You even tried to bait those in with saying you prefer to keep immigration "legal" - but we all know the trap that keeps illegal immgrants here: outlaw deportations, and make every immigrant case "asylum", and magically, everyone who might've been here illegally a few years ago is legal.
You may get 175K likes on your semi-subverting, PR-designed photographs. But those of us who know, know you're fake.
https://t.co/vMml22uCbu