you don't need more setups
you need the same one, taken the same way, enough times that you stop second guessing it
that's been the whole focus since I came back. one ICT model, NY session, nothing before 10:00
skip a step and you're not trading the setup anymore. you're trading a feeling
worst habit I had to kill wasn't losing trades
it was marking my levels the night before, writing down exactly what I wanted to see, then freezing when price actually got there
hesitating feels like being careful. it isn't. it's just not trusting your own prep
if the plan was made calm, follow it when it's live
one green day doesn't mean you figured NQ out
I've had plenty of those. the day after is usually where the damage happens. size creeps up, rules get loose, you start clicking stuff that isn't your setup
a good day is just one day
same model tomorrow. after 10:00. max loss still applies
people ask how long it took to learn ICT
the concepts weren't the long part. liquidity and FVGs click fast
the long part was me. overtrading, revenge trades, forcing setups
it only got easier when I started doing less
one model. fewer trades. done at max loss
trading is hard. nobody's arguing that
you know what else is hard? dragging yourself to a job you can't stand for the next 30 years
both are hard. only one gets easier the more work you put in
pick your hard. then journal, backtest, wait for the A+ setup and respect max loss
someone's always gonna hate your bias
doesn't matter. they're not in your trade and you're not in theirs
I map the higher timeframe, mark the liquidity I want, wait for my setup after 10:00. if it never shows I'm done
stop reading the comments to decide what NQ is doing
easy to say you trade like a pro. watch what you actually do when price moves fast
entering because a candle got big. bailing on a good trade because your heart rate went up. sliding the stop so you don't have to be wrong
that's gambling with a chart on the screen
the ICT model was never my problem. it was me not letting the setup come to me
if your rules aren't written down before the open, they're up for negotiation the second NQ starts moving
mine fit on one sticky note
bias from the higher timeframe
which liquidity I want taken
after 10:00 or nothing
max loss and I'm done
sounds basic. it's what stops me making it up as I go
what's on yours?
bond market's shut today for Veterans Day
NQ can still move but a lot of the usual flow isn't there. thinner tape, more random wicks
days like this I'm extra picky. if it's not my bread and butter setup after 10:00, I don't click
check the calendar before the week starts, not at 9:29
nobody posts what this job actually costs
the boring sessions. the stop that gets tagged by a tick. closing the chart at max loss when you just know price is about to go
that's the price of admission. most people want the results without paying it
took a break and came back with way less ego about it. still paying it every day
This wicks says a lot about my idea of getting to $80.
The $85 target has been exceeded, but I'm rethinking whether we'll see price get to $80. I'm going to wait for more confirmation, but I think we're seeing some kind of reversal. The wicks are saying a lot about the market not going down to that level.
bread and butter setups look boring on here
sweep, displacement, FVG, wait for price to come back to it. that's most of it
people skip it because it looks too easy. it only looks easy after the candle closed
in real time it's sitting on your hands till after 10:00 and not clicking the one that's almost there
This wicks says a lot about my idea of getting to $80.
The $85 target has been exceeded, but I'm rethinking whether we'll see price get to $80. I'm going to wait for more confirmation, but I think we're seeing some kind of reversal. The wicks are saying a lot about the market not going down to that level.