that Eren yearned for something completely contrary simply because of being reactionary towards that ending & defending Isayama’s honor is more important than being logical and concise of his work. Be fucking for real.
The idea Eren desired a blank slate despite trying to know what’s beyond the walls was ILLEGAL and the attempt of trying to know lead to indirect executions, including armin’s parents, shows you people don’t think at fucking all just react to slop Isayama throws at you.
I think the one thing the anime doesn’t really show as well is erens hesitance when it comes to why he wants to see the outside world/blank slate.
It was there since the very start and I think his expression etc is more than enough. You don’t need everything spelt out lmao
He’s going point blank in our face “there’s something beyond the walls” which both the audience & the characters know. He makes his main character aspirant of the survey corp, who is gassed up as humanities last embers to venture on what is & what is lost, now y’all wanna believe
There's two types of illiterate aot fans that leave me frustrated for days after a debate:
1. The ones who think eren lost fair and square.
2. The ones who think he lost cuz he couldn't kill his friends.
BREAKING NEWS ❗️
🔴 A TRAGIC LOSS FOR THE ARTS COMMUNITY
Stephan Dillane, known for his role as Stannis Baratheon in the series *Game of Thrones*, passed away at his home this evening. His death was confirmed by the hospital where he had been taken. Stephan Dillane was 69 years old and was known to be battling cancer.
Eren was fucking livid at Annie, and Mikasa thought there was a reason; thankfully, there was none. Eren was fucking livid over Historia, and Hanje thought there was a reason; thankfully, there was none. Eren was livid over humanity, armin thought there was a reason; thankfully—
El beso de Eren y Mikasa en Shingeki no Kyojin es la cumbre de un romanticismo oscuro y realista: su amor nunca pudo consumarse en un mundo en paz, solo en la tragedia de la muerte. Es el reflejo perfecto de la obra.
She didn’t give anything insightful. She just fear-mongered basic logic. “If you only remain, you’ll go to war & kill each other”
No shit? Cuz it’ll be the one remaining. If she’s promoting self-extinction, that’s just no longer the character but *author* fear-mongering
Bringing this video back with the current Aot "The Rumbling would've solved everything" discourse.
Isayama did everything in his power to make the Rumbling unjustifiable and it still didn't get through.
@Jin_0__01 “Did they have the opportunity to get into peace talks and negotiations”
No. They attempted but was proven they wouldn’t be through observation. Seriously what’s hard to grasp here?
@Jin_0__01 You’re being pedantic. Paradis attempted to get into a peace talk with hopes that it will able to speak up for paradis & it was shut down immediately. The observation answers the outcome. This isn’t a matter of whether they did or did not talk, it’s a matter if they could’ve.
@Jin_0__01 They attempted to solve their problem with first starting out with observation and was shut down.They still attempted. Paradis still wants to be its own country. If it desires to be unified with the other nations, that’s establishing yourself as an ally. Regardless of past.
@Jin_0__01 It’s still an attempt, just short lived. Also, The association was something fresh. They didn’t know what it was for until it exposed itself. There was nothing further that could’ve been done.
Also the “founder’s power” is just power re-establishment. No one wants that.