>Shooter was a communist incel jihadist
>The attack was directed at jewish pornhub
>He killed a muslim cop instead
>The only other victim was killed by a female cop
This feels like a shitpost
Socialists love the sound of spending but seem remarkably indifferent to results.
Imagine ordering a pizza, never receiving it, then being told the solution is to pay more for another promise.
That's how they evaluate government. The spending is the achievement. Delivery is optional.
What terrifies me about this is the potential backlash against peaceful white people. Imagine if Muslims started mass-murdering Germans at Christmas markets, raping English teenage girls, stabbing Irish schoolchildren, or blowing up cars in Sweden?
I have now read the Rape Gang Inquiry Report in full.
I've been following this story quite closely for something like a decade so I'm not exactly surprised by its contents, but three elements stand out to me amongst the horror.
The first is that a large majority of the victims who provided testimony describe some kind of troubled or disrupted home life. Some were molested by family members before the rape gangs ever got ahold of them. Others faced physical abuse, neglect, drug addicted parents, housing instability, and so on.
Their testimony often describes a kind of "screening" process where a girl's particular vulnerability was evaluated with more moderate boundary pushing before escalation to full on rape and abuse.
This isn't necessarily surprising given the nefarious intentions the gangs had for these girls, but their willingness to explicitly target the absolute most vulnerable children who were already struggling sickens me. These girls, more than anyone, needed some kind of adult guidance in their lives, and this vulnerability was cynically exploited to initiate them into an even more egregious Hell.
Which brings me to the second detail, which is the extreme violence these girls were subjected to. "Grooming Gang" is an unacceptable euphemism that may accurately describe common initiatory tactics employed against these girls, but which criminally downplays the behavior of their abusers once initiated.
These girls were not "merely" groomed into sex. They were not "merely" raped. They were not "merely" trafficked. They were subjected to a program of overtly racialized sexual torture and humiliation designed to maximally degrade them and kill them in their souls. And this was "acceptable" because they were White and not Muslims.
This detail fundamentally alters the character of these crimes. This was not horny men out of control or even cross-cultural understanding gaps around the age of consent. This was a targeted program of ritualized torture and subjugation as a means of ethnic domination. In other words, these gangs are conducting war against the White British using serial child rape and torture as a form of conquest.
These are not crimes in the conventional sense. These are war crimes being conducted by one civilization against another, and they need to be treated as such.
And finally, the third point (encapsulated in the excerpt below) is that every single level of the state utterly failed these girls in the most egregious and unfathomable ways imaginable.
It's one thing when you have no physical evidence and are confronted with a "he said / she said" situation with respect to a rape allegation. It's another thing entirely when you have a pre-teen frequent flier at the NHS back again for her Nth sexually transmitted disease treatment, a 13 year old with broken glass shards embedded in her vagina, or a pregnant 13 year old.
These are cases with obvious alarming physical evidence that no one addressed in any meaningful way.
Politicians (Labour in particular) covered it up and suppressed action into investigations in order to maintain the Islamic bloc vote.
Police suppressed investigations, dismissed accusations and evidence, intimidated victims into silence, arrested victims for the crimes of their abusers, dismissed proven cases of rape with impotent warning letters, and in some cases directly raped the girls themselves.
Care homes disregarded obvious signs of abuse (including outright confessions), and enabled their abusers to maintain consistent access to the girls, in some cases acting more like pimps than caregivers.
Social workers addressed victims' needs so incompetently they recommended victims audition for a TV show role about being a child prostitute because it was "relatable" and even attended a victim's coerced sham marriage to her abuser.
NHS staff consistently failed to do anything in the face of overt medical evidence of obvious, undeniable sex crimes against these girls, treating the acute problem and sending them on their way with no protection whatsoever.
And teachers, much like the social workers, routinely delivered their students into the predatory arms of their abusers as they waited outside the schools, and utterly failed to appropriately address signs or confessions of abuse.
Virtually every arm of the state is directly complicit in exacerbating the abuse. Not one single institution at any level reliably offered protection or recourse to these girls.
As far as I am concerned I Restore government would be entirely justified in firing every single person in the employ of the state. If they are not a documented whistleblower they are complicit and thus compromised, and none of them have any business retaining their roles or their pensions. On the contrary large numbers of state officials deserve severe penalties for criminal negligence or outright complicity in these crimes.
Justice for these crimes will necessarily take place at a scale that will shock the pacified sensibilities of the over-socialized Liberal West, but nothing short of a biblical level reckoning will be sufficient to qualify as justice in this case.
@RupertLowe10 is not wrong to draw comparisons to the Holocaust. It is the only appropriate frame of reference in the popular zeitgeist that articulates the actual magnitude of what was allowed to take place under successive British governments. Nor is he wrong to propose the reinstatement of the death penalty as the appropriate restitution for these crimes.
The rapists and state officials who enabled this atrocity both deserve to hang. And I pray that the British public will entrust Rupert with the power to deliver justice long overdo.
In any case I am deeply appreciative of his efforts to bring this to light. He is the hero Britain needs right now.
Vote Restore. Deliver these girls justice.
Balkans who all look basically the same slaughter each other for decades. Jews and Arabs slaughter each other for centuries. Protestants and Catholics slaughter each other. And we were supposed to believe that sticking Indians, Pakistanis, Sunni and Shia Muslims, Jews, and White people all in the same confined space was going to work out?
The Karmelo Anthony ordeal boils down to the simple fact that a non-trivial number of black people believe that they should be governed under a sovereign hood code, and any white person who is in proximity to a black person consents to be governed under hood code. This means that any interpersonal escalation, regardless of the degree of escalation, creates the grounds for the exercise of deadly force to defend one’s “manhood.”
They do not think they should be required to submit to the law of the white man. If Karmelo were being tried in a court applying “hood code” he would be completely innocent because he murdered in defense of his manhood. So it is not that they are just pretending they believe Karmelo is actually innocent, they genuinely do believe he is innocent, but under a different set of “laws.” They therefore understand this to be a “modern day lynching” in the sense that Karmelo is being forced to submit to the law of the white man, and therefore his right to murder on behalf of his manhood, which they do sincerely believe is his right, was “violated.”
"You hate socialism because you want people to starve."
No. You support socialism because you mistake good intentions for good outcomes. History has been paying the price for that confusion for over a century.
Part of public school brainwashing is the sanctification of public school teachers.
Notice how when asked how much they make he reflexively says “not enough”? That’s an acclimation of faith.
“I don’t think you have mate” has created a memetic fulcrum
It doesn’t need to be explained or defended
It’s too transparent to be dialectically subverted
The power of Laconic phrase against the Athenian subversion
What kind of government warns us not to enter very dangerous countries, yet lets people from those same countries just walk into ours without a passport?