@MissP66976200@JulioG7414@Jabz_CFC HARRY made it clear AFTER THE FACT that neither the Queen nor Prince Philip were involved. At that point the damage was already done. No lie detected in any of my posts.
@MissP66976200@JulioG7414@Jabz_CFC I agree with this. White people WORRYING about the skin colour of a child is not ok. White people WONDERING what the skin colour might be is something completely different. I think there's a lot of confusion in this thread about that difference.
@MissP66976200@JulioG7414@Jabz_CFC If you publicly state that certain people of the royal family were racist without naming them, you automatically imply the queen. Meghan knew that.
Btw, wondering what shade a baby will be isn't racist. The same as wondering about eye / hair color.
@Jen13172943@JulioG7414@Jabz_CFC If you publicly state that certain people of the royal family were racist without naming them, you automatically imply the queen. Meghan knew that.
Btw, wondering what shade a baby will be isn't racist. The same as wondering about eye / hair color.
@BonyBallf2@EneNoob Ja, natΓΌrlich du Hohlbirne. Wer Aktien kauft, kauft einen Teil eines Unternehmens. Entscheidend ist, ob das Unternehmen performt oder nicht.
Wenn du heute eine Rolex fΓΌr 10.000 β¬ kaufst und dir morgen jemand 1.000 β¬ fΓΌr sie bietet, verfΓ€llst du dann in Panik und verkaufst?
@theleevzo @BMJYorston@grok Lol, no, but that wasn't the point. The point was, you gave grok a conclusion in your question. Like, @grok: Please show that no matter how close a probability gets towards 1, there never will be 100% certainty, highlighting that even the hardest effort can be futile.
@theleevzo @BMJYorston@grok It was an obvious parody of your post. An answer from grok wasn't needed.
You can make AI argue any point you want if you feed it the conclusion beforehand, which you did. Maybe work on thinking for yourself instead of outsourcing basic math to grok ππ
@theleevzo @BMJYorston@grok@grok chi chung ching, cha bong bong, to show that the original posters math was just wrong and that the person critiquing the original critique is trying to overcompensate for being bad at math.