Mary Ellen O'Connell is the Robert and Marion Short Professor of Law and Research Professor of International Dispute Resolution—Kroc Institute for International
Jimmy Carter, champion of international law's purposes: peace, human rights, the environment & prosperity. Here he wrote of the illegality of targeted killing:
A Cruel and Unusual Record https://t.co/JuMriNkGdv
Notre Dame works to defend peace, human rights & the rule of law everyday. Last night, less than an hour from us, Indiana carried out an execution. The first in almost 15 years. Re-dedicating to making it the last.
@aurelsari @BCFinucane @LeilaFadel He referred to CCW II & his view it applies in Lebanon. The more emphatic ban on booby traps is in peacetime human rights law prevailing in the absence of armed conflict hostilities. See the ILA Report: https://t.co/IOPXWqEMMV
War is still avoidable if Lebanon/Hezbollah respect international law that bars pointless responsive uses of force. USA back up the law by achieving a ceasefire now
https://t.co/9BYKrlGR6G
🎙 NEW PODCAST: Is there a place for natural law in today's world?
On the latest @EntitledPodcast, Professor @cfloed and cohost @tomginsburg talk to @OConnell_IntLaw about natural law and its potential to inform international law.
https://t.co/suvkCCsqOe
#Harris2024 can demonstrate to the world commitment to the rule of law. End US targeted killing now:
Assassination is always unlawful − regardless of who is killed and on whose orders https://t.co/TUcNk7ATjV via @ConversationUS
“The drafting of that treaty [on autonomous weapons systems] is a golden opportunity for law to recapture war and peace”
@OConnell_IntLaw at the 2024 Vienna Conference on AWS
"There's real consensus and urgency for a treaty and even what the content of what that treaty is going to be... the drafting of that treaty is a golden opportunity to reconsider and recapture authentic int'l law in the war and peace area." - @OConnell_IntLaw#AWSVienna2024
📌Check out the recording of our latest event.
❓Attempting to Kill the Law of Peace, with @OConnell_IntLaw talking about international law, use of force and peace.
🤝 Co-hosted by @HCRInstitute & @law_uom
https://t.co/1BRbDatKaW
@aurelsari@AdHaque110 No--you cannot attack with doubt that the target is military. Presumption means doubt is resolved in favor of civilians. If the attacker has knowledge of a military target assuring no disproportionate impact on civilians is more subjective.