If you’re reading this there’s a chance you said some dumb shit and got mad at my reply. If so, Hi! Now go search my page for ammo since logic isn’t your thing.
@cardano_gourmet Of course he is getting paid lmao. Probably under NDA. People don’t waste their time for free. The man was involved in embezzlement during the FTX stuff and settled in court. Scum.
@vasylzahorodnuk@uexcapital@TapTools My guess is they don’t want to give up control. They want a bailout rather than a buyout. Maybe they figure actually shutting down will allow them to get some bailout funds from somwhere or they can reopen when market conditions get better.
@4Runna97@ItsDave_ADA That was my response to your last two messages. You resorted to the fat man stuff and proceeded to discussion. Your out of real substance no point in continuing this thread
@4Runna97@ItsDave_ADA You guys are too dumb and short sighted to realize exactly what is about to happen lol. While you say the opposite about the ones who disagree with you. Its great.
@4Runna97@ItsDave_ADA I think we will see a large reallocation of political power. Ive got my popcorn ready for when you all are raging on twitter. You guys own twitter for sure gotta give ya that but really your just a small portion of the ada community and are gonna get to see how irrelevant ya are.
@Upstream_ada You misunderstand. It’s an idea. For it to work and be viable ada holders will have to endorse it when its goes live. If the majority of ada holders disagree it’ll fail. If the majority agree (which they will) the twitter mob and their echo chamber rages out then fucks off.
@ADAjosephineADA@IOHK_Charles And the entity that actually held and moved the ADA was Wave a separate custodian—not Charles personally. Who the “transmitter” even is matters here. You’ve argued it qualifies no regulator or court has found that it does, or that anyone failed to register. That’s where it sits.
@ADAjosephineADA@IOHK_Charles Where I still land differently is it not the same as proven wrongdoing. Holders got 100% of what they bought, there’s a refund window open to 2028, and no court or regulator has found a violation. Real facts but the “unlicensed money transmitter” headline still isn’t established.
@ADAjosephineADA@IOHK_Charles Credit where it’s due after reading Corduan’s code breakdown, I was wrong on the technical point. The redemption codes were Ed25519 private keys, and the report’s denial doesn’t survive it. You were right that buyers held the keys to their ADA. I’ll own changing my view on that.
@ADAjosephineADA@IOHK_Charles But your whole argument rests on one premise, that buyers owned the funds. That’s the claim the report disputes. They got a one-time redemption code, not a private key, and that “private key” wording was a documented mistranslation of “password.” No ownership, no transmission.
@ADAjosephineADA@IOHK_Charles I was hoping you’d say that, because I did read it. Did you? The report never says “money transmitter.” It argues holders never had custody and routed the swept funds through Wave—an SEC-registered custodian. That’s the opposite of unlicensed transmission. Quote the admission.
@realPsyclops Its fine, other chains will be gone in 10 years cause they can’t handle the 30x in crypto traffic due to lack of scalability and security. You and me will be rich because Cardano was fine all along and spent time preparing for that rather than short term adoption/price.