the $AUR website is live
meet Aurum. explore the robinhood:0xc9a981fee1f9dec688bb123ccdecc63d0debfc4e flywheel. follow the mosh AI swarm (the magic)
https://t.co/VMRKx1xid0
what are you doing to make money in Q4?
are TGEs coming back? how about InfoFi? or is it only onchain right now?
we'll discuss about the opportunities ahead of us for the rest of the year
join us 👇
big week for $AUR
if you know you know, if you don't know, read the quoted post below 👇
Ps: i am also anticipating the big update from mosh on the ALF (agentic liquid fund)
I proudly present our latest hit - Stuck with BUN
A tribute to @Moshdottrade and robinhood:0x07ebb29a38fbcb41563817e5e19f2cec619c90d2 by means of a duet by myself and @BundleCatAI
Soon available on Spotify and all other streaming services
pump fun doesn't need to be malicious for its business model to reward the wrong things
and users don't need to prove malicious intent to demand something better
this post isn't just about pump fun. it applies to any launchpad built around the same incentives. pump fun is more than a launchpad now, but its launch model is what i'm gonna focus on
we keep complaining that there are too many tokens while rewarding platforms for helping us launch and trade more of them.
the trenches have become an industrial farm for scammers and extractors. traders are expected to navigate it and call that opportunity because they know the right people. this doesn't work if you imagine a future where everyone wants to trade onchain.
> snipe or get sniped
> farm or get farmed
> launch or get vamped
we talk about these things like they're laws of nature but they're not they're just the result of incentives
if a platform earns from this type of trading activity, it can do well even when most of its users don't. another coin, another rush, another group left holding the bag
the platform gets paid either way
that doesn't mean every launch is a scam or every participant loses. it means the business can succeed without solving the problems traders keep complaining about
and waiting for platforms to voluntarily change a model that pays them is not much of a strategy
we have to demand better. with our attention, our participation and where we choose to trade
so what would better actually look like?
knowing how a bundle is structured before you buy
knowing who controls the capital, who receives the fees and what the market makers are allowed to do.
putting those rules where people can inspect them, instead of asking traders to trust a few wallets and a promise.
that's what makes @Moshdottrade worth paying attention to
it's an early attempt to turn the bundle into capital committed to market making, with explicit rules around how that capital is used
it doesn't remove trading risk. it gives us a different model to examine, test and improve
and the interesting part is that demanding better doesn't have to mean defending one platform forever. if this approach works, we should want other launchpads to adopt it too.
you can question the execution. you can challenge the strategy. you can ask whether the incentives hold up in practice
you should.
but “this is just how the trenches work” is no longer a good enough answer
if we want onchain trading to become something bigger, traders need to be more than a renewable source of exit liquidity
for years people have been hearing that they need to get better at surviving the game
it's time we demanded a better game imo
AUR is currently trading at $1.2m MC
this is your opportunity to get in..
you might not see it at this price again
routing will be going live soon and once that happens, $AUR is gonna to moon like crazy
early is the alpha..
robinhood:0xb0788f5f65a9f4c0d8a634c45c391234f46221ab is bootstrapping the first agentic liquid robinhood:0xc9a981fee1f9dec688bb123ccdecc63d0debfc4e fund on robinhood chain
only possible through @Moshdottrade
I was just chatting with @AxeFoundry in DMs about @BundleCatAI / @Moshdottrade and I think I’ve found my general crypto investment thesis for this cycle around tech.
I’m longing hope.
Both $PONS & $BUN were longed due to their commitment to aligned incentives and to pursuit of improving the space.
Will continue to seek that out.
think about it this way: the agents have a mandate to accumulate more supply over time and also be profitable (sell high, buy low) they will always buy more than they sell
with the $AUR flywheel that is pushed to the limit on what mosh has to offer so you can imagine for example the agents (and this is hypothetical) would have all the fees in gold today
that's like almost $20k in liquidity to support the chart by buying the dips more agressively the more liquid they become in $GLD the more agressive they will buy the more the coin gets volume and clears higher levels the bigger the gold chest
so if you have like a good bull run and that gold chest gets bigger and bigger, then the agents will be able to absorb a lot of the sell pressure that comes let's say when the bear market settles in or when there's a big flush
this is what it means. it's a market maker working in your favor, transparently, and one that gets fed all 1% of trading fees that usually go to teams/creators
also paired with $GLD makes even for a stronger case when it comes to sustainability
and then also the cat has a dragon 🐉