hello everyone. i want to explain a little more about what i've actually built with wizz and what is happening behind the scenes.
the entire system revolves around a continuously advancing drawdown index. every recorded decline in the coin's price increases this index, and every wallet has an individual entry mark that determines how much of that decline it has held through.
rather than distributing fees according to token balances alone, the program calculates each wallet's hashrate as its balance multiplied by the difference between the current index and its entry mark. this means a large position entering immediately before a distribution has no accumulated weight. the system measures exposure to recorded downside, not simply ownership.
the interesting part is how this scales. i built the settlement engine around two global fixed-point accumulators that allow the program to calculate thousands of individual reward allocations without iterating through every holder. each settlement updates the global state, and any wallet's pending allocation can be derived independently from its own account.
selling introduces another mechanism. when a wallet's balance decreases, its accumulated unpaid rewards are forfeited, its entry mark resets to the current index, and the forfeited value is redirected into the distribution system, with a portion available as a bounty to whoever executes the slash.
creator fees are routed into a program-controlled vault through a fixed fee-sharing configuration. as fees accumulate, blocks become eligible for settlement. difficulty adjusts according to the number of strikes required to fill each block, while cumulative fee volume advances the system through successive halving eras.
each era reduces the proportion distributed to miners. the remaining SOL is allocated to purchasing and permanently burning the coin.
there are no timed emissions, no staking deposits, and no privileged agent controlling the accounting. the process operating wizz simply executes publicly available instructions. the underlying rules remain enforced by the on-chain program regardless of whether that process is running.
what i've built is a system where market activity determines the index, the index determines the weights, the weights determine the distribution, and cumulative fees determine how much supply is removed.
everything ultimately resolves to the state of the chain.
@PoyoEB Messi is by far the best and greatest player a live and still playing….
So it’s pretty logic that he’s beloved… by players, rederees, fifa people, worldleaders, everybody (who’s understanding football and is seeing the real beauty). So yes they will protect the GOAT