@MV33_4ever33@harve98267@fia That's like saying what's the point of having regulations when they clearly weren't followed (2021). All comes down to "rules are rules" unless it benefits any other driver but Lewis Hamilton.
๐จ | BREAKING NEWS:
Ferrari recieves the 4% ADUO.
Surprise shock as Mercedes receive 2%.
Red Bull undoubtedly have the best engine
๐ฐ @Auto_Racer_it
@PeterJSmith1988 @oxf_alfie7889 top tier rage bait!!! devlin gets tripped by him, we are on the attack therefore it must be a second yellow. thatโs more of a red card offence (cos 2nd yellow) then ogilvies โstraight red card challengeโ in the first half. Ref was so biased itโs unbelievable
@DarthNucleus69@ElPredestinato i mean you do not.
21 was won due to safety car retest procedure being broken which handed max the advantage.
08 (your looking at crashgate, but your missing out on masses poorly timed pit stop and strategy that lost in that race ๐
@LewPNE17@NewmanHay@PompeyNewsNow If he "got the ball" how do you defend the referee awarding a goal kick then...
Scenario 1. The PNE player touches the ball? (But he gives a GK so he knew he didnt touch it)
Scenario 2. The PNE player doesnt touch the ball, Stonewall Penalty.
@sehoff44@ethan_chatsball@scuderiakylian When speaking about interpreting the rules. They were relating to the section about "any lapped cars must be required to unlap the leader". The interpretation differently as they mentioned, it doesnt explicitly say "all cars". It say "any" not "all" Try again buddy
@sehoff44@ethan_chatsball@scuderiakylian Anyone with basic english reading skills can tell that there is no way to interpret that differently btw. Maybe take your MV glasses off and youll see it
@sehoff44@ethan_chatsball@scuderiakylian Except thats the entire rule of 48.12, yes some parts can be interpreted differently. However that section that I pointed out can only be read differently if your blind and you'd need brail ffs
@sehoff44@ethan_chatsball@scuderiakylian 48.12. The safety car didnt complete the extra lap as required by the regulations, its clearly written right there, there is no way that this can be "interpretated" different
@sehoff44@ethan_chatsball@scuderiakylian No rule was broken? hm okay, so even though the fia put it down to "Human error", which means someone did something wrong your saying no rules were broken, alright buddy.
merc wasnt faster though, Im gonna trust adrian newey over sehoff4 on x.
@sehoff44@ethan_chatsball@scuderiakylian Except rules were broken but you are to thick to see that through your max verstappen tinted glasses, and your making yourself a twat here