Something doesn't ad up, why would united fight unless it's about dissagrement over money and nothing to do with injury. The player is fully fit according to Atlanta and player looked fit during the world cup.
So far the source report comes from Atalanta
Another audio drops. Temba in conversation with Rutendo. Hanzi ED hapana paya akadyiswa nana July Moyo. Temba goes on to say that if you compare ED and Bob you can see Bob was a statesman kwete ED hapana chozikanwa paya 😂😂😂
🚨 NEW: Manchester United and Spurs are AWAITING a decision from Mateus Fernandes on which club he ONLY wants to join; the chosen club will then be in a stronger position to negotiate with West Ham.
West Ham are holding firm on an £80-85M asking price for Fernandes despite relegation, thanks to a recent cash injection that lessens their need for an immediate sale. Fernandes has not yet committed, and while United’s interest predates Spurs’, the situation remains fluid with potential for other clubs to re-enter.
[@JacobsBen, @talkSPORT YT]
Spurs are in advanced talks with Mateus Fernandes as they rival Manchester United for the West Ham midfielder. Fernandes is one of Tottenham's top targets, as exclusively revealed.
West Ham seeking £80m-£85m, around double what they paid to Southampton.
An incoming £90m shareholder cash injection is likely to leave West Ham in a stronger negotiating position.
Manchester United are also in talks with both Fernandes and West Ham.
Spurs are also rivalling Manchester City for Sandro Tonali.
And Spurs, Manchester United and Arsenal all have Alex Scott on their radar, who Bournemouth hope signs a new deal.
Movement expected now in the next days/weeks on all fronts as clubs enter into the new financial year.⚒️
🚨 Cristiano Ronaldo: “I’m the most complete player EVER. To say that Cristiano isn’t complete is a lie”.
“You may prefer Pele, Messi, Maradona, I understand and respect that”.
Victor Matemadanda was never afraid to speak his mind, even when it was uncomfortable for those in power. Whether people agreed with him or not, he earned a reputation for saying what he believed rather than what was politically convenient. For that reason he was poisoned.
“President Mnangagwa is wasting his time. When this matter returns to court, it will be declared null and void. On this one, the courts will say: ‘We are separate from the legislature, and you have crossed the line.’”
— Prof. Lovemore Madhuku
CHANGE BREAKING NEWS
Pandemonium in Parliament as Casten Matewu Joins Growing List of MPs Rejecting CAB3
By Change News
'Follow Change News WhatsApp Channel
https://t.co/GOPLvncRMe'
HARARE — Tensions reportedly escalated in Parliament as Marondera Central MP Hon. Casten Matewu joined a growing list of legislators expressing opposition to Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 (CAB3).
The increasingly heated debate has exposed deep divisions within Parliament as more Members of Parliament continue to question the necessity, timing and implications of the proposed constitutional changes.
Observers say the debate has become one of the most contentious parliamentary discussions in recent years.
Growing Resistance Inside Parliament
Matewu's intervention adds to a growing chorus of parliamentarians who have publicly raised concerns about CAB3.
The debate has increasingly shifted from a routine legislative process into a broader national conversation about constitutionalism, representation and democratic accountability.
Several MPs have argued that Parliament must focus on defending the Constitution and addressing citizens' concerns rather than pursuing controversial constitutional amendments.
Heated Exchanges
Proceedings became increasingly animated as legislators sought to make their positions known.
At various points, Justice Minister Ziyambi Ziyambi reportedly attempted to guide debate toward specific provisions of the Bill, drawing objections from some MPs who argued that Parliamentarians must be allowed to fully express the concerns of their constituents.
The exchanges reflected the intensity of feeling surrounding the proposed amendments.
Citizens Watching Closely
Outside Parliament, Zimbabweans continue to follow the debate closely.
Across communities, social media platforms, universities and workplaces, many citizens continue asking why constitutional amendments have become a priority while the country faces significant economic and social challenges.
The questions remain familiar:
💼 Where are the jobs?
⚡ Where is reliable electricity?
🏥 Where is quality healthcare?
🚰 Where is clean water?
📈 How is the economy being fixed?
Many citizens argue that these issues deserve Parliament's immediate attention.
A Defining Constitutional Moment
For supporters of constitutionalism, the debate over CAB3 is about more than legislative procedure.
It is about whether Parliament remains accountable to the people who elected it.
It is about whether constitutional safeguards should be altered without broad public consensus.
And it is about whether elected representatives will stand with citizens or political interests.
We The Citizens
As the parliamentary drama continues, one message continues to echo across many communities:
🗣️ Protect the Constitution.
🗣️ Respect the voters.
🗣️ Focus on the economy.
🗣️ Listen to the people.
🗣️ Drop CAB3.
From Marondera to Harare, from campuses to communities, citizens continue to make their voices heard.
🇿🇼 People Versus Power.
🇿🇼 The Constitution Belongs to the People.
🇿🇼 Drop CAB3.
🇿🇼 We The Citizens.
---
CHANGE BREAKING NEWS
Change the News. Change the Narrative. Change the World.
#WeTheCitizens #CAB3Series #CastenMatewu #DropCAB3 #ZimbabweSaysNo #ProtectTheConstitution #PeopleVsPower #ChangeNews
URGENT NOTICE
Fellow Zimbabweans,
Today, we have all seen and heard the reports:
The Constitutional Court will deliver its ruling on two related cases brought by a group of war veterans led by Reuben Zulu, and by former opposition MP Dubeko Sibanda tomorrow morning, 17 June 2026.
These cases challenge the legality of Constitutional Amendment Bill 3.
The matter was heard on 20 May, and judgment was reserved.
In simple terms, the challenge is this:
President Mnangagwa is accused of failing his constitutional duty by presiding over a flawed process that made wide-ranging changes to the Constitution.
Now listen carefully
The Constitutional Court will release its ruling tomorrow morning 17 June, 2026 at 09:30hrs, only hours before Parliament sits to push for legislators to vote on this bill.
Fellow Zimbabweans, I must say this clearly:
The Constitutional Court has been under increasing pressure from litigation connected to the 210 MPs.
As we all know, many MPs did not respond to the court challenges after the applications were handled through Chief Whips, ensuring Parliament business would continue.
So now, instead of trying to fight every past legal battle, the ConCourt is moving toward an exit, an answer that resolves the immediate crisis.
And the exit, the only real exit, is the ruling in the Reuben Zulu and Dubeko Sibanda case,
tomorrow, against Mnangagwa and against the Parliament’s push for the vote.
In that judgment, we expect the Constitutional Court will address key questions raised in the matter, including whether the bill, as it stands, is consistent with the Constitution.
We also expect something else:
The Constitutional Court will be making a decision with full hindsight, meaning it will understand the real political and legal consequences of this process.
And let us not pretend otherwise:
There will be criminal consequences for those who helped violate the Constitution.
The message is clear, those who assisted in knowingly breaking the constitutional order will face consequences.
So what do we expect tomorrow?
We believe the Constitutional Court will not, cannot, remove Parliament’s legislative power.
The Court will interpret, only whether the processes and procedure comply with the Constitution.
And this is our position:
The correct legal way forward is not to force this bill through.
It is clear that three separate bills are required.
Therefore, the bill must be withdrawn, and relaunched in two parts:
Part one: the sections that do not require a referendum
Part two: referendum 1 of part two being to extend the term of the president and
Part three: referendum 2 of part two being whether the incumbent can benefit or not
NOW TO OUR MPs
Do not go to Parliament tomorrow to vote as if nothing matters.
We will be watching you.
Musaenda Ku Parliament Mangwana munogona kusangana nezvimwe ikoko
Do not Go and l repeat Do not Go. We all know in every war, it is inevitable, there are always casualties and even DEAD bodies as we witnessed in our road to the 1980 independence.
But why should it be you…. Fungai vana, Fungai mhuri ……there is always tomorrow
The time has come.
Usazoti hauna kuyambirwa.
Hokoyo!
Yours Cde Knox Chivero