@BDHerzinger If the Navy is rhetorical foundation of the joint force, where is its infrastructure? Its enabling capabilities? Its logistics? The Navy has willingly ceded MILCON, sustainment, and much of its enabling capabilities to the Army. Donβt be mad the Army recognizes it.
For a service that prides itself so heavily on discipline, the Marine Corps seems to have a lot more serious disciplinary issues in Okinawa than the Air Force, Army, and Navy in Japan and South Korea.
WATCH: During a recent meeting with U.S. military and diplomatic officials following the arrest of a Marine on suspicion of killing a local woman, Okinawa Gov. Genta Koja delivered a formal protest letter and demanded revisions to the status of forces agreement that governs U.S. military personnel in Japan.
π₯: @KeishiRKoja
Read more here: https://t.co/3J3bp1773N
This is a sentiment that I certainly share with a key reservation: islands donβt move. Carriers do. The operational and tactical value of the carrier emerges from its ability to deliver air power from unexpected areas. There are only so many 5-10k ft runways in Micronesia.
This is another area where comparisons to the Iran War fail: land runways can be easily repaired. An aircraft carrier cannot be easily repaired. A land runway can withstand missile strikes - but with an aircraft carrier you only need one successful hit and its out of action.
π¦π§ππππ§π ππ‘ π§ππ π¦ππ¬ π«‘
Two B-2 Spirit aircraft assigned to @Whiteman_AFB fly over Falcon Stadium before kickoff.
#FlyFightWin
@scipio1776@WeaponScientist I had the exact opposite experience at USAFA. Civilian professors were largely more reasonable than their uniformed counterparts. I had great experiences with both, but the civilians are a large part of my formation as a young officer
@ChrisChattin@dmbkparker The single best teacher I ever had a service academy was a former TFO guy who made me read Marx and Mao. I am a better soldier and officer because of the fact that I was made uncomfortable by what I read.
@ChrisChattin@dmbkparker I really donβt see how. I want professors willing to call cadets out and challenge them. The whole concept of both classical and liberal education requires professors to challenge things that their students say. That requires academic freedom.
@ChrisChattin@dmbkparker Many professors are folks who spent time in military service or civil service themselves and are returning to educate our cadets because they care about their development. The vast majority are great Americans and weβre lucky to have them. We should want to keep them.
@ChrisChattin@dmbkparker If you think that itβs a destination for career academics, youβre wrong. In general, Service Academy civilians make less than what their counterparts make at the Ivies. They receive less support for what little research they do because of the lack of endowments.
@ChrisChattin@dmbkparker Itβs not traditional tenure style research though. How many tenured professors at other institutions are putting undergrads through research involving satellite communications? The Service Academies produce great product precisely because they give hands on experience beforehand
@cdrsalamander Sal, maybe if you didnβt go to a Service Academy, you shouldnβt really make strong statements on the topic. Iβm not going to tell you how to drive a ship.
SCOOP: @SecWar is ending the appointment of civilian employees to tenured positions at U.S. Military Service Academies.
The move is intended to refocus military academies on βwarfighter education,β Hegseth said in a memo obtained by @realDailyWire.
https://t.co/tI4n94fjeE
@Fallujahrwds@WeaponScientist I would say about 60% of the civilian faculty at the Service Academies have experience in civil service or military service prior to making the transition to academia. We have exceptional military faculty, but the civilians are absolutely a value add that we canβt lose.