The norm here is to use individuals as negative examples and dunk on them
Let's try violating that norm! Let's talk about social problems in a more general way without sacrificing particular people on a digital alter
Much of the intellectual left continues to be troublingly anti-intellectual. A left publication publishing an interview with a conservative is seen as a betrayal. Do they really think the broad unpopuarity of their politics has nothing to do with this sort of purity policing?
There’s no clever tech-based alternative to just having good government, good ’official’ media, good universities, etc. You can’t route around decline. https://t.co/N4aWQPNBGR
There is no social media, software, or algorithmic solution to truthful, generative, high-brow discussion. I wish tech people would finally accept this. The experiment is finished! The results are in and they are negative! The solution is the old one: new curated institutions.
I wonder if progressive will realise that their power largely lay in generating fear, rather than anything righteous.
Probably not, because they assumed that by claiming to speak for the oppressed, or by assuming the role themselves, that they could not really be wielding any power.
But weak institutions were terrified of bad publicity and individuals were frightened of losing work and friends. No one agreed, bar a few fanatics/sadists, with the content of progressivism, nor their tactics. But a lot of people failed to stand up to them because they were terrified. Life goes on.
Mouse is proud to republish visual artist Karen Shaw's 1978 work "Market Research", which represents her Kabbalistic extrapolations of hidden messages from coupons and brand labels. https://t.co/wwA2xb7vSe
This astute post isn’t about electoral politics but it points toward a much richer understanding of social media’s transformative effects on politics than monomaniacal “disinformation” experts offer.