BAE

[BAE @OddlySpecificRT]

@Hand_some_truth Excellent job man

[BAE @OddlySpecificRT]

@Rightanglenews Cop should've had to pay for her time and aggravation fighting this. This is why people hate cops.

[BAE @OddlySpecificRT]

@uubzu The law firm that represented Jon Schaffer would be good contenders - they're not cheap though. They're either called Attorneys on Retainer or Attorneys For Freedom.

[BAE @OddlySpecificRT]

@Bilal1070985 Old enough to know the Dewey decimal system, let's leave it at that. lol

[BAE @OddlySpecificRT]

@uubzu Yeah, this is a conflict of interest. Clearly the lawyer doesn't value his client's right to unbiased defense, nor does he appreciate that Chud simply said a no-no-word and then defended himself after being assaulted for saying a no-no word.

[BAE @OddlySpecificRT]

@Irina_exh You don't. You can't. Maybe other than introducing some Apartheid system. It wasn't worth the cotton.

[BAE @OddlySpecificRT]

@TheRealMarina0 Think about what's be laid out here. People who participated in a presidential election by voting for a candidate on the ballot are now being warned by this cunt they'll not only be charged - but convicted - of treason for voting for him? Do you realize how insane that sounds?

[BAE @OddlySpecificRT]

@DingsLord @dirtydan_4547 Sadly you're right. I've had private conversations with city council members I agree with, and the pressures and threats they said were exerted on them raised my eyebrows. What else can we do?

[BAE @OddlySpecificRT]

@fudreaper_ Thank you, this is the first principled stance I've seen on this. If white people can't say "nigger" and then defend themselves against an assault for saying the word, the First Amendment is effectively nullified. "Chilling effect", anyone?

[BAE @OddlySpecificRT]

@Sofia50020Sofia Beautiful family, although the mother needs to lay off the tanning booth a bit.

[BAE @OddlySpecificRT]

@ChudsArmy Ugh. They can't have some restraint and decorum? I envy the Afrikaners that have their own whites-only town and thus don't have to share space with them.

[BAE @OddlySpecificRT]

@libra989 @therobbieharvey I've clarified three times now. If you're confused, you haven't made a good faith attempt to read and comprehend it.

[BAE @OddlySpecificRT]

@AmiriKing It wasn't worth the cotton. The only saving grace is that the percentage of blacks in the U.S. population isn't going up, and they'll increasingly find themselves fighting the increasing Hispanic population.

[BAE @OddlySpecificRT]

@Majour_Bags @RegularSanStan @therobbieharvey I already addressed this point when I said "free speech would be meaningless if violence could routinely silence speakers, so criminal law and public order protections are supposed to reinforce the practical ability to speak freely..."

[BAE @OddlySpecificRT]

@RegularSanStan @therobbieharvey ....right. That was my point.

[BAE @OddlySpecificRT]

@RegularSanStan @therobbieharvey Firing someone from their job/banning someone from a store or school is legal. Assaulting someone is not.

[BAE @OddlySpecificRT]

@ElJefeDeHtown @PoliceThePolic1 Why make this about race? This was white-on-white.

[BAE @OddlySpecificRT]

@RegularSanStan @therobbieharvey free speech would be meaningless if violence could routinely silence speakers, so criminal law and public order protections are supposed to reinforce the practical ability to speak freely, even though the First Amendment itself is mostly aimed at government conduct