Censorship Watch UK

Campaigning for UK voters against TV & Internet censorship.

Oversight of UK Government CENSOR 'Office of Communications' (Ofcom). Support UK 'Free Speech Bill'

[Censorship Watch UK @OfcomCommentary]

Today's publication of the model Free Speech Bill marks the start of a new counter-offensive to restore our ancient rights of Free Speech in Britain.

This #RottenGovernment will fall and never see power again in this land.

Read it here 👇
https://t.co/qjF2YpkuIw

[Adam Gwiazda @delestoile]

🟥 Czy Henry Nowak mógł przeżyć?
Dr Krzysztof Magier @DrMagier , lekarz pediatra i były konsul honorowy RP w Cowes, przeanalizował nagrania z policyjnej kamery nasobnej pokazujące śmierć Henry'ego Nowaka.
Dr Magier jest lekarzem prowadzącym oddział intensywnej terapii dziecięcej, z doświadczeniem w szkoleniach z medycyny pola walki oraz po specjalistycznym kursie leczenia ciężkich urazów (w tym ran postrzałowych i kłutych).
Nie zgadza się z opinią patologa i sędziego, że Henry Nowak nie miał żadnych szans na przeżycie i ze skucie go w kajdanki nic w zasadzie nie zmieniło. Wręcz przeciwnie – istnieje duże prawdopodobieństwo, że to interwencja policji przyczyniła się do jego śmierci.
Przeanalizował on raport z sekcji, który wskazuje na uszkodzenie żyły podobojczykowej jako główne źródło krwawienia i tłumaczy, gdzie leży problem.
U zdrowej osoby krwawienie żylne odbywa się pod niskim ciśnieniem i często samoogranicza się dzięki powstającemu naturalnie skrzepowi, a samo zbliżenie krawędzi rany i ucisk otaczających tkanek domyka żyłę na tyle, że spowalnia albo nawet zatrzymuje krwawienie.
Z nagrania z policyjnej kamery nasobnej wynika, że gdy policja przybyła na miejsce (prawdopodobnie 5-10 minut po zranieniu), Henry był na tyle przytomny, że mówił dość głośno. Nie był zatem jeszcze w stanie terminalnym. Po wykręceniu rąk do tyłu i skuciu za plecami najprawdopodobniej doszło do rozciągnięcia żyły, rozerwania skrzepu i gwałtownego nasilenia krwawienia. W ciągu zaledwie ok. trzech minut stracił przytomność i zmarł.
Osoby z podejrzeniem urazów wewnętrznych nigdy nie powinny być gwałtownie przemieszczane ani szarpane – takie działanie może zniszczyć naturalny skrzep i doprowadzić do masywnego krwotoku wewnętrznego.
Zamiast natychmiastowego wezwania zespołu ratownictwa medycznego i przekazania pacjenta w ręce ratowników, policja go skuła. Gdyby na miejscu jako pierwsi pojawili się paramedycy, szanse Henry’ego na przeżycie byłyby znacznie większe. "50%" - pisze dr Magier.
Ratownicy mogliby szybko założyć kroplówkę, podać płyny zwiększające objętość krwi krążącej oraz kwas traneksamowy stabilizujący skrzep, a w razie potrzeby wykonać dekompresję igłową (wkłucie grubej i długiej igły w płuco), bo problemem nie był tyle brak funkcji płuca, ale ucisk zalanego krwią płuca na serce i śródpiersie, który blokuje krążenie.
Co gorsza, incydent miał miejsce zaledwie kilka minut jazdy samochodem (2–3 minuty karetką na sygnale) od Southampton University Hospital – regionalnego Major Trauma Centre dysponującego pełnym zapleczem specjalistów, procedur i sprzętu. "Jestem przekonany, że gdyby Henry dotarł tam żywy, lekarze nie pozwoliliby mu umrzeć" - pisze dr Magier.
Podsumowując: agresywna interwencja policji, zamiast ratować życie, doprowadziła do śmierci przez nieodpowiednie postępowanie z ciężko ranionym człowiekiem, mimo że najwyższej klasy opieka była w zasięgu kilku minut. "Obawiam się, że Sędzia i patolog byli zbyt łaskawi dla policji" - pisze dr Magier.

[Lara Logan @laralogan]

Massive victory so far for Steve Hilton.

[Christopher Talbot @Lord_Talbot64]

I don't think they were mate.

[Judicial Watch ⚖️ @JudicialWatch]

Judicial Watch’s federal lawsuit confirms California has a dirty voting rolls crisis – with thousands of old names on the rolls going back at least 10 years. Dirty voting rolls can mean dirty elections. California and its counties must take immediate steps to clean up the rolls.

[Steve Hilton @SteveHiltonx]

ELECTION NIGHT: HUNTINGTON BEACH

I am a very proud American and a very proud Californian. This one is for you, Arnold @Schwarzenegger! ☀️🇺🇸

[Censorship Watch UK @OfcomCommentary]

@Fujimori_v2 @BasilTheGreat Good point.

We already have a UK model Free Speech Bill drafted. It entrenches individual free speech rights, repeals anti-free speech & state censorship legislation.

Read it here 👇
https://t.co/H5Mic7f3go

[Censorship Watch UK @OfcomCommentary]

Today's publication of the model Free Speech Bill marks the start of a new counter-offensive to restore our ancient rights of Free Speech in Britain.

This #RottenGovernment will fall and never see power again in this land.

Read it here 👇
https://t.co/qjF2YpkuIw

[Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat]

I have started a religion in the UK called Gunism.

A core belief of ours is that we should carry firearms and are therefore religiously exempt from any law prohibiting us

Who wants to join?

[Benny Johnson @bennyjohnson]

This is the most important image on the internet right now:

Henry Nowak’s hand cuffed.
Pale due to loss of blood.
Henry is dying.
The demonic hands of the British authorities restraining him as they coddle his migrant murderer.
Henry bleeds out as UK cops and migrants insult him

[Harman Singh Kapoor @kingkapoor72]

Carrying a kirpan like this also solves the issue of religious belief.
We don’t need a long and sharp blade to fulfil our need to carry a ceremonial dagger.

[Emma Dunwell @ESpeaksFreely]

An officer must have a valid objective reason to believe handcuffing is necessary. The accepted criteria include:

1 - Preventing Escape: A reasonable belief that the detainee will attempt to run away.

Henry Nowak was unable to stand, let alone run away.

2 - Preventing Harm: To protect the officer, the public, or the detainee themselves from imminent violence or self-injury.

Henry Nowak was bleeding out, unable to attack anyone. The actual perpetrator was still free and uncuffed at this time.

3 - Preventing Evidence Destruction: When a suspect is highly likely to conceal, drop, or destroy evidence.

While no one was watching Digwa, he handed the murder weapon to his mother who then hid it in their home. Digwa also took videos of Henry desperately trying to escape before police arrived. These videos (to my knowledge) have not been released.

4 - Controlling Non-compliance: When the individual is actively resisting or failing to cooperate.

Once again, Henry could hardly get the words "I can't breathe" out, there was no risk of lack of compliance.

Why was Henry Nowak handcuffed?

[Censorship Watch UK @OfcomCommentary]

@Con_Tomlinson We believe people should take to the streets to protest this murder and oppose bad policing.

[Connor Tomlinson @Con_Tomlinson]

I hate to mention it, but you can hear the hidden-hand of the state's community relations managers in Henry's father's speech.

"Henry was one of the most inclusive individuals..."

"This is not a case about Sikhism. This is not a case about racism..."

"This doesn't mean going to the streets..."

If Henry's father wrote every word, then I will retract my suspicions.

But from "Don't look back in anger" after Manchester Arena, to the parents saying "Have no hate in your heart for any race or religion" after Valdo Calocane's stabbing spree in Nottingham, we have seen time and again how the government coaches themselves grieving families to rattle off antiracist slogans, all to manage public outrage about crimes that never needed to happen, committed by people who do not need to be here.

[Alex Armstrong @Alexarmstrong]

Henry Nowak’s father is a hero for reading that statement out today in front of the press.

His incredible demeanour shows Henry was raised in a well mannered home.

The same cannot be said for the Digwa’s family, one of whom allegedly shouted “racist” at the Nowak family leaving court today. The same uncivilised behaviour demonstrated by Digwa’s mother who tried to cover up her evil son’s crime.

[Benny Johnson @bennyjohnson]

The bodycam footage of Henry Nowak has just been released.

An 18-year-old who was stabbed FIVE TIMES called the police for help.

His attacker told officers Henry was a racist.

So they handcuffed the victim.

Henry told them over and over:

"I've been stabbed."
"I can't breathe."
"Please brother, I can't breathe."

An officer responded: "You've been stabbed, mate? I don't think you have."

Henry died in handcuffs.

The mainstream media has said NOTHING.

Where is the same outrage from when George Floyd died?

Watch this footage. Share it everywhere.

Pray for Henry’s family.

[Censorship Watch UK @OfcomCommentary]

@JamesHarvey2503 Hampshire Police must be the first police force to be totally disbanded.

[Censorship Watch UK @OfcomCommentary]

@BurnsideWasTosh Hampshire Police must be completely disbanded.

[Censorship Watch UK @OfcomCommentary]

@RobertJenrick Hampshire Police must be disbanded from top to bottom.

[Censorship Watch UK @OfcomCommentary]

@Keir_Starmer Too late.

Your previous silence makes you complicit.

[Censorship Watch UK @OfcomCommentary]

Free speech in Britain is dead — but not yet buried.

It wasn’t killed by one tyrannical law or one government.
It was strangled by a thousand bureaucratic cuts.

Now councils are using PSPOs to fine people for swearing, shouting, or even staring — turning everyday human expression into a criminal offence.

This creeping authoritarianism is suffocating us.

We urgently need a Free Speech Bill to bring it back to life.

[The Free Speech Union @SpeechUnion]

The Free Speech Union is concerned by the growing trend of councils using broad and vaguely worded Public Spaces Protection Orders (PSPOs) to police everyday behaviour in an increasingly Orwellian manner.

New figures reveal that one in five councils has introduced bans on swearing, offensive language or shouting.

A survey of nearly 300 councils found that 61 (20.3%) had imposed restrictions on swearing and shouting — up from just 16 in 2022.

Josie Appleton, Director of the Campaign for Freedom in Everyday Life, said: “Officials should not be able to punish or restrict people simply because they might cause offence.

“We urgently need proper safeguards to ensure these powers are tightly defined and used only to address genuine nuisance and harm.

“It is extraordinary that you could now be fined for swearing in the street, shouting across a road, or even staring at someone. Council officers have been given the power to criminalise behaviour that has never previously been a matter for the law.

“This isn’t tackling antisocial behaviour — it’s policing ordinary human expression, controlling the words we use and the gestures we make.”

Read more below 👇