@LawrenceLepard@theswansjr His son owns and is an advocate for bitcoin. I think Schiff plays the villain from the perspective that bad publicity is good publicity while his son gives the family the exposure.
Total speculation, but smart if true imo.
I’d be happy to have the conversation.
It doesn’t even have to be a debate; you can simply critique my perspective.
I’m here to share what I believe to be true.
If you think I’m wrong about anything, I’m always happy to update my understanding.
I don’t care about popularity.
I only care about accuracy.
We’ve met before.
I’m happy to share my views, receive pushback, and help move people closer to the truth.
And, respectfully, while I know your prior work was quoted in the Bitcoin white paper, you said you were playing catch up on Bitcoin in 2013.
I draw much of my analysis from being around some of the Bitcoin developers in 2011 and from being a shareholder in more than 100 Bitcoin companies since the early days.
As you may remember, and for full transparency, I even tried to invest in Blockstream, but the company ultimately became dominated by venture capital and financial-industrial-complex interests, and your board declined my investment.
I also believe Blockstream took Epstein-connected funding through Brock Pierce, who later sold his shares, as you publicly confirmed recently.
Care to push the conversation forward respectfully, Adam?