@SheBrokemyS0UL@blakebooming Valid. But he also benefits from having a ton of talent around him.
Long story short Iโm not fully disagreeing with you.
Just saying certain players are great for the locker room.
But front office has to be able to pay them for their play not their past
@SheBrokemyS0UL@blakebooming Whereโs this extreme difference in production?
Contender or not, you try to keep players around that are pillars.
Our problem is we overpay based on past performances.
If we kept Cam/Ak and were contenting we would be praising management
Would it honestly be a week of @Saints football if we didnโt lose a starter to injury requiring surgery AND be out a couple of O-Linemen?
Why yall surprised?
@8lackMarket @DloThompson1 The foundation of the original tweet in this thread is mocking label control.
You right. They grown ass men.
But a contract is a contract
Nobody asking you to fight for them lmaoo.
We too busy pinning two figures against eachother to move the culture forward
@8lackMarket @DloThompson1 You realize thatโs all perspective based right?
โGoodโ is subjective. The song generated buzz, streams and momentum.
Thereโs people out there that think Luther is trash. Yet it has all of the above.
@8lackMarket @DloThompson1 I am speaking from the business side.
Idc about the beef.
ANY song can be paid for to be in top 40, from there itโs up to quality and momentum to determine placement/longevity.
But if the label isnโt willing to invest in the channels necessary the song will not perform. Simple
@8lackMarket @DloThompson1 Yes and no. The song has to be good for it to stick & resonate w global audience.
A labels job is to invest in their biggest assets & divert from liabilities.
Drake is against them right now (liability)
Kendrick is their main focal point right now.