It's been 5 years now ever since we lost a 5-acre mechanized vegetable farm to a bush fire caused by the people. So I went to study agribusiness. Sankofa
13/12/2025 I need an investor to work with me, I am going back to the field, and I have 2 boreholes ready
The Ecowas Court has just ruled in favour of Ghana and dismissed former Chief Justice Torkonoo’s action on all claims. The Court found that no violations of rights occurred and that she was not entitled to her claim of 10 million US dollars.
Ghana’s case was pleaded and argued by Deputy Attorney-General - Dr @JusticeSremSai. And the former Chief Justice was represented by well known Senior Advocate of Nigeria - Femi Falana.
Femi Falana lost his cool after the Judgment and made a remark that the judgment should be made available so all judges in teh sub region would know that they cant rule against their Governments. The Court found the conduct and comments of Femi Falana “unacceptable” and “did not expect that from him".
Court was impressed with submissions arguments made by Justice Sai and upheld all of them.
The Court ruled as follows:
1. The Suspension of the Chief Justice did not violate her right to work. The Court rejects Torkonor claim that her suspension was arbitrary and motivated by ill will.
2. Torkonoo was not arbitrarily dismissed. The Court finds that due process was observed.
3. The Chief Justice’s claim that she is also a member of the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court and should have been removed separately from all these courts absurd. In the Court's view, her membership of these courts flowed from her position as Chief Justice. And if she was no longer Chief Justice, she could not claim to be a member of all the separate courts.
4. The Court rejects Torkonoo’s claim that her removal was unlawful because the Committee only confided itself to only the first petition and did not go into the second and third petitions. The Court finds that on the whole, the Committed acted prudently in the interest of judicial economy.
5. The Court rejects Torkonoo’s claim that she was treated to undignified treatment, because she was searched, and that her husband and family were excluded from attending the parties; and also that the choice of Adu Lodge, was deliberate because of her uncle. The Court found that the measures taken to secure the proceedings were lawfully and proportionate.
6. The Court rejected the claim that the Committee violated her rights by continuing with the removal proceedings, despite the fact that she had filed an application for provisional measures seeking to suspend the proceedings.
7. The Court holds that Ghana did not violate Torkonoo’s right to receive information about the proceedings. That even though Torkonoo is entitled to receive the full report and record of proceedings, she did not even prove that she had first requested for the full report before proceeding to court.
The confidence I have when traveling is my passport. 🇬🇭
It may not be the strongest passport in the world, but the name Ghana carries something special.
Nobody cares till it becomes detrimental to the populace. Even when the treated water settles, you will still see impurities beneath. Man has no option but to use this same water to cook. #StopGalamseyNow
@IvyEnyonam_ We the youth must do all it takes to take out any government that is not ready to develop Ghana
We deserve better
Election has consequences