Old Graybeard

INTJ. 😎 A Coffee a day, keeps the grumpy away. Menos es Paz! ✝️

[Punchbag Studios @punchbagstudios]

The first leaders of feminism would turn into the most insane misogynists if they could see what their actions would lead to😂

[Old Graybeard @Old_Graybeard_]

No, that is not the issue. The fact is that nowhere did that word ever mean 'full of grace' in any context. If there were an option to choose that meaning, you would have a good point. However, that was never an option. It was a plain mistake by Jerome when translating Greek to Latin in the late 4th century

[Old Graybeard @Old_Graybeard_]

The academic reality completely tanks this meme.

The angel in Luke 1:28 didn’t say "full of grace," he said Kecharitomene (κεχαριτωμένη).

In secular Koine Greek of that era, the root simply meant to make someone "charming, attractive, or socially acceptable"—it denotes a status of favor, not a physical substance filling a vessel.

Luke didn't even invent the word. The exact same perfect passive construction appears in the Septuagint (Sirach 18:17) referring to a regular, "agreeable/favored man" (kecharitōmenō). Grammatically, it just means "one who has been and remains favored."

❌ The "full of grace" rendering is a 4th-century Latin Vulgate paraphrase (gratia plena), not the actual mechanics of the original Greek text the angel "literally" spoke.

[Old Graybeard @Old_Graybeard_]

Las unicas personas que se comportan como tu lo estas haciendo son las mismas personas que están comprometidas.

Tanto la lista como el cheque validan la transferencias, las compras de interses y voluntades. 🤷🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️.

Mira, algo similar paso en mi pais cuando bukele ya no siguio los lineamientos de los financistas en el tema de Maras, aborto, ideologia de genero. Todas las ONG de derechos humanos nacionales e internacionales y medios como CNN, BBC, NYTimes, Univisiony otras se les fueron en contra, en una campaña agresiva de desinformacion. Resulta que todas esas ONG estaban financiadas por Soros. No hace falta ver los cheques para sacar conclusiones.

[Old Graybeard @Old_Graybeard_]

@Easy_Biblia @Ekklectico 🤣🤣🤣

[Old Graybeard @Old_Graybeard_]

@Easy_Biblia @Ekklectico 🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️ Que terrible.

Si te dan la lista, vas a pedir los cheques, si te dan los cheques vas a pedir los originales, si te dan los originales, vas a pedir que sean certificados por notario.

Existen listas de las iglesias que reciben estas donaciones. Es informacion publica. 🤦🏻‍♂️

[Old Graybeard @Old_Graybeard_]

The academic reality completely tanks this meme.

The angel in Luke 1:28 didn’t say "full of grace," he said Kecharitomene (κεχαριτωμένη).

In secular Koine Greek of that era, the root simply meant to make someone "charming, attractive, or socially acceptable"—it denotes a status of favor, not a physical substance filling a vessel.

Luke didn't even invent the word. The exact same perfect passive construction appears in the Septuagint (Sirach 18:17) referring to a regular, "agreeable/favored man" (kecharitōmenō). Grammatically, it just means "one who has been and remains favored."

❌ The "full of grace" rendering is a 4th-century Latin Vulgate paraphrase (gratia plena), not the actual mechanics of the original Greek text the angel "literally" spoke.

[Old Graybeard @Old_Graybeard_]

@Easy_Biblia @Ekklectico Me impresiona la arrogancia y la soberbia que se manejan, pero no saben de lo que hablan.

👇

[Old Graybeard @Old_Graybeard_]

@Easy_Biblia @Ekklectico Que triste y pobre razonamiento.

[Old Graybeard @Old_Graybeard_]

Me sorprende el enorme sesgo que estás mostrando.

Las evidencias ya se presentaron. Existen pruebas de que hay financiamiento de por medio hacia estas iglesias, lo que las compromete a seguir ciertos lineamientos. Nunca vas a encontrar un documento oficial donde las partes hagan constar la compra de intereses; sin embargo, sería muy ingenuo negarlo. Ya existen antecedentes de estas prácticas en la política, y la influencia del poder político en las iglesias para manipular la opinión pública es un fenómeno histórico. La relación de las iglesias con quienes financian a estos grupos es algo que se puede medir y comprobar claramente a través del discurso político.

[Old Graybeard @Old_Graybeard_]

Sí, totalmente de acuerdo.

Si combates al feminismo, debe ser con la María bíblica, sumisa y humilde, no con la reina entronada y empoderada en el cielo; esa figura todopoderosa capaz de proteger al mundo entero, tal como lo evidencia la idiosincrasia del católico promedio que deposita su esperanza de protección en ella (ver captura).

En este caso, esta fabricación empoderada de María no combate al feminismo, sino que lo promueve.

En la Iglesia católica, ninguna mujer puede ser elevada a los rangos jerárquicos más altos, ni siquiera al grado clerical más bajo del sacerdocio. Mucho menos en el reino de los cielos se observa jamás a una mujer real (no simbólica) ostentar un trono en posición de autoridad suprema sobre el universo, encargada de proteger con un "manto sagrado" a toda la humanidad.

[Old Graybeard @Old_Graybeard_]

The Roman Catholic Church remains fundamentally wrong on this doctrine. It creates an artificial necessity for never-ending ritual offerings, directly defying the absolute finality of Jesus Christ's work on the cross.

This is where the Roman Catholic Church commits its greatest theological blunder:

presenting Christ as presently "offering" Himself.

This false dogma fabricates an absurd "perpetual motion" loop that strips the biblical text of its ultimate climax—absolute, seated rest.

By insisting on an ongoing offering, Catholic theology locks Christ in a state of never-ending ritual labor. It functionally pulls Him off His throne of finished victory and drags Him back to an active altar.

This is not high theology; it is a direct assault on the sufficiency of the cross, replacing Christ's triumphant posture of completion with a relentless, manufactured cycle of priesthood.

❌ The Catholic Claim (Catechism 1367): Christ "now offers (offerens) through the ministry of priests." [Present tense, ongoing action].

✅ The Biblical Verdict (Hebrews 10:14, 18): "By a single offering he has perfected for all time...

This is a flagrant contradiction between catechism and Scripture.

The syntax of Hebrews 10 leaves no room for compromise:

zero offering equals total victory.

The moment Catholicism claims an offering is still happening—even under the guise of an "eternal present"—it declares Christ's past work insufficient.

Catholicism claims the Mass introduces "nothing new" and is identical to Calvary. This is a linguistic and logical impossibility based on their own practices.

If the offering were truly single and finished, you would not need:

❌ A new human mediator (the ministerial priest).

❌ A new physical location (the parish altar).

❌ A new ritual action (the transubstantiation and consecration).

By any definition of human language, performing a distinct ritual action, via a distinct human agent, on a distinct physical altar, thousands of times a day worldwide, constitutes many offerings. This undeniable reality exposes the total contradiction at the heart of Roman Catholic dogma.

It stands as a direct assault against the true gospel, the true scriptures, and the ultimate sufficiency of the single sacrifice of Jesus Christ.

[Old Graybeard @Old_Graybeard_]

The Roman Catholic Church remains fundamentally wrong on this doctrine. It creates an artificial necessity for never-ending ritual offerings, directly defying the absolute finality of Jesus Christ's work on the cross.

This is where the Roman Catholic Church commits its greatest theological blunder:

presenting Christ as presently "offering" Himself.

This false dogma fabricates an absurd "perpetual motion" loop that strips the biblical text of its ultimate climax—absolute, seated rest.

By insisting on an ongoing offering, Catholic theology locks Christ in a state of never-ending ritual labor. It functionally pulls Him off His throne of finished victory and drags Him back to an active altar.

This is not high theology; it is a direct assault on the sufficiency of the cross, replacing Christ's triumphant posture of completion with a relentless, manufactured cycle of priesthood.

❌ The Catholic Claim (Catechism 1367): Christ "now offers (offerens) through the ministry of priests." [Present tense, ongoing action].

✅ The Biblical Verdict (Hebrews 10:14, 18): "By a single offering he has perfected for all time...

This is a flagrant contradiction between catechism and Scripture.

The syntax of Hebrews 10 leaves no room for compromise:

zero offering equals total victory.

The moment Catholicism claims an offering is still happening—even under the guise of an "eternal present"—it declares Christ's past work insufficient.

Catholicism claims the Mass introduces "nothing new" and is identical to Calvary. This is a linguistic and logical impossibility based on their own practices.

If the offering were truly single and finished, you would not need:

❌ A new human mediator (the ministerial priest).

❌ A new physical location (the parish altar).

❌ A new ritual action (the transubstantiation and consecration).

By any definition of human language, performing a distinct ritual action, via a distinct human agent, on a distinct physical altar, thousands of times a day worldwide, constitutes many offerings. This undeniable reality exposes the total contradiction at the heart of Roman Catholic dogma.

It stands as a direct assault against the true gospel, the true scriptures, and the ultimate sufficiency of the single sacrifice of Jesus Christ.

[Bree Solstad @BreeSolstad]

The problem for Protestants is they don’t believe there is any sacrifice in their religion. The highest form of worship they offer to God is praise.
So when they see Catholics venerating relics or honoring Saints, all they can see is worship.
They need their eyes & hearts opened.

[Old Graybeard @Old_Graybeard_]

Never let any weird sect convince you, or try to desensitize your conscience, by teaching that bringing a skull to the table is just something normal.

[meta thomist 🇻🇦 @metathomist]

“Honey, our friends family is Protestant. Don’t bring up religion”

Me:

[Old Graybeard @Old_Graybeard_]

If only they read Hebrews, they wouldn't be embarrassing themselves

"And where these have been forgiven, sacrifice for sin is no longer necessary."

Hebrews 10:12: "But when this priest had offered for all time one sacrifice for sins, he sat down at the right hand of God."

Hebrews 10:14: "For by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy."

Hebrews 9:26: "But he has appeared once for all at the culmination of the ages to do away with sin by the sacrifice of himself."

Hebrews 7:27: "He sacrificed for their sins once for all when he offered himself."

Hebrews 7:23-28
Unlike the other high priests, he does not need to offer sacrifices day after day, first for his own sins, and then for the sins of the people. He sacrificed for their sins once for all when he offered himself. 28 For the law appoints as high priests men who are weak; but the oath, which came after the law, appointed the Son, who has been made perfect forever.

[Old Graybeard @Old_Graybeard_]

Si bien la historia de Eliseo demuestra que Dios puede obrar milagros a través de los restos de una persona santa, esto no dio origen a una industria de reliquias entre los judíos.

¡Así que no! Esto no justifica la pagana, vergonzosa y simoníaca industria católica de las reliquias».

Estos católicos se comportan como una secta extraña. Intentan desensibilizar tu conciencia para hacerte creer que estos actos horrendos son normales y hermosos.

Los cristianos comunes y cualquier persona sensata creeria que los muertos deben ser dejados en la tierra sin ser perturbados. Exhumar un cuerpo para exhibir los huesos o distribuirlos se considera una profanación grave.

[Old Graybeard @Old_Graybeard_]

Tu iglesia ni siquiera se atreve a declarar salvos a sus mismos fieles, ni tiene la autoridad para decir quienes ya están salvados. (Afortunadamente tenemos la autoridad de las escrituras que si lo establece).

Lo unico que se atreve a decir tu sede Romana, es que las iglesias iglesias protestantes son medios de salvacion. Además, se afirma que quienes creen en Cristo y son bautizados en estas comunidades, entran en comunión con la Iglesia catolica siendo considerados hermanos.

Decreto Unitatis Redintegratio (n. 3) - Concilio Vaticano II:
"El Espíritu de Cristo se sirve de ellas como medios de salvación"

Catecismo de la Iglesia Católica (Párrafo 819):
"los elementos de santificación y verdad (Palabra de Dios, gracia, virtudes) presentes fuera de la Iglesia católica conducen a la salvación, con el Espíritu utilizándolos como medios de salvación."

[Old Graybeard @Old_Graybeard_]

@Banedarkrises @ExtremoFascista Si tu iglesia nos llama hermanos cristianos y reconoce que obtenemos la salvacion en nuestras propias comunidades. No podriamos ser herejes. Porque tendrias herejes en el cielo siendo hermanos tuyos. Ve y aprende a razonar bien.