@zhoutonged500k@latimeralder ๐ Your baseless dismissal of climatology, climatologists and physicists is an ad hominem attack on their integrity and competence, you pathetic hypocrite !
@Jkhippie420@CuCiaragan@simonmaechling Brush up on your physics. No hypothesis of dark matter has ever suggested that it would be made up of atoms. It doesn't interact with emr and yet, as Rubin discovered, except in some dark galaxies, it impacts star velocities!
@dickandtinasson@simonmaechling Most people who complain about IARC are public relations people from industry, like Simon, or consumer front groups like @acshorg , who almost always take big industry's views on controversial issues and then get donations to support their two-bit writers.
@georgehlowrey@Clarsonimus Modern socialism originated in the West, in Europe specifically, even if many of the values and practices associated with it have appeared in diverse cultures throughout history. I hope you know law 'cause you seem to be as clueless of history as you are of climate science. ๐
@LanaLuBerry@sgjdoc@simonmaechling@ACSHorg It's pretty clear if you examine the background of @acshorg and Simon etc. And I am not defending quacks by any stretch of the imagination. You seem to think that there must be 1 good guy and 1 bad guy. A childhood full of bad cowboys & Indians movies, perhaps? ๐
@xynyxs@Clarsonimus That was a statement about the total ice stored on land, Einstein. Not a prediction. Shill strategy: take an exaggerated media claim or statement out of context in an attempt to discredit solid science. Pathetic on your part! #climatebrawl
@JiriBogdan@simonmaechling You're digressing from the fact that I caught you using Simon's style: saying things that are are 50 to 80 % true, but pretending they are gospel. Recently he poked fun at people fearing Cl2, forgetting that cities have been increasingly using 03 instead to disinfect water.
@KamikaziKoala@ChrisMartzWX A growing proportion of storms are reaching the highest categories (Category 3โ5). Multiple studies & the IPCC conclude this increase is likely real &can't be explained solely by natural variability.
@simonmaechling Wrong. IARC clearly identifies the difference. See reference. Your company doesn't like it when one of its products shows up on their list. And you and @acshorg and zaruk vilify them without basis. https://t.co/4RVhCHUqTd
@LexWaters7@HmGinYYCisBack@DrKutney Go back to school. You will learn what Communism really entails and that it hardly exists in Canada outside of tiny fringe groups. Then study physics and chemistry before parroting propaganda against climatologists. How long have you been such a useful idiot?
@LexWaters7@DrKutney@HmGinYYCisBack I know , Lex. It's difficult for a scientifically illiterate person such as yourself to understand how a small amount of gas can have such a profound effect . You must also struggle with understanding how a stratospheric concentration of only 2โ8 ppm of Oโ is crucial for life.