2028 Australia will be ONE NATION! 🇦🇺
Simping for our future PM Pauline Hanson.
I DM people who block DMers.
~We love Him, because He first loved us.~ 1 John
Australia Needs Her Hero 🦸♀️
ARE YOU READY FOR 2028⁉️
This country is about to experience a renaissance.
The communists have been running wild. 🧚🧙🦹
The children have been left unattended, and they've decided to burn everything good to the ground and replace us. 🚼
It's time for the adults to take back control. 🫸💪
In 2028, Australia will be One Nation! 🇦🇺🧡
https://t.co/GixUbgNFWV
Directed by Jeff Tate
https://t.co/7YxPmUlxZ6
This is an UNOFFICIAL and UNSOLICITED promotion for One Nation.
NOT affiliated with One Nation.... yet! 😅
Prompts written with @grok 🤖
Made with Seedance 2.5
Upscaled by Topaz
All on https://t.co/SPCMCoasvX
@Higgsfield
TUNE:
BONNIE TYLER - I Need a Hero (Audacity Touch Remix)
https://t.co/d4o6lGMOmN
In Memoriam: Bonnie Tyler
For all the Muslims and communists who keep claiming that Australia was founded as a secular state detached from Christian belief - you are wrong.
"Whereas the people of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania, humbly relying on the blessing of Almighty God, have agreed to unite in one indissoluble Federal Commonwealth under the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and under the Constitution hereby established…"
Australia was formed by a people who identified as Christian, petitioned for God to be acknowledged in their founding document, and inherited English law and institutions shaped by the biblical moral order that Christianity retained.
That is the historical record. Claims that the Constitution was written as a purely procedural secular instrument is a political manipulation, not what the conventions, the census, or the framers show.
The 1901 census, taken in the year of Federation, recorded Australia's population as 96-97.5% Christian.
The largest groups were Church of England, Roman Catholic, Methodist and Presbyterian. Non-Christian minorities were small. This was the society that voted on the Constitution and whose churches organised the petitions that shaped the preamble.
Church bodies collected tens of thousands of signatures calling for recognition that God is the supreme source of law and authority. The Melbourne session of the 1898 Convention responded. Patrick Glynn moved the insertion of the words that still open the preamble: the people of the colonies united “humbly relying on the blessing of Almighty God.” Those words were not decorative. They reflected the view of the people who had petitioned and of the delegates who accepted them.
The framers themselves said:
Sir Henry Parkes, the “Father of Federation,” wrote in 1885: “We are pre-eminently a Christian people - as our laws, our whole system of jurisprudence, our Constitution… are based upon and interwoven with our Christian belief.”
Sir John Downer, a South Australian delegate and member of the drafting committee, told the Melbourne Convention that “the Christian religion is a portion of the English Constitution” and “part of the law of England which I should think we undoubtedly brought with us when we settled in these colonies,” so that the Commonwealth would be “from its first stage a Christian Commonwealth.”
Alfred Deakin treated the whole process as providential and prayed that Federation would foster “a Christlike citizenship.” Glynn described religion as the bond that gives unity and tone to society, not merely the force of law.
These were not fringe opinions. They were the assumptions of leading framers working inside a Christian population.
Australia received the English common law. That law had long treated Christianity as part of the legal order. Colonial courts stated the point plainly. In Ex parte Thackeray (1874) the New South Wales Supreme Court held that the colonists brought with them the maxim that “Christianity is part and parcel of our general laws” and that “all the revealed or divine law, so far as enacted by the Holy Scripture to be of universal obligation, is part of our colonial law.”
The “revealed or divine law” of universal obligation is the biblical framework Christianity inherited from the Hebrew Scriptures - the Ten Commandments and the related teaching on the dignity of persons, justice, the accountability of rulers to a higher law, and the restraints on murder, theft, false witness and adultery. These were the ordinary moral assumptions of the criminal law, the protection of life and property, and the idea that government is limited because it stands under a higher authority. They were not copied clause by clause into the Constitution; they were the background against which the Constitution was written.
The framers also drew on the American Constitution, especially for federalism and the religion clause that became section 116. The American founders were themselves operating inside a Christian, specifically Judeo-Christian, moral framework. They grounded natural rights in the Creator, limited government because power is dangerous, and separated institutions so that no single arm could claim absolute authority.
Section 116 limits the new federal Parliament’s power to establish a religion or prohibit free exercise. It protects liberty of conscience; it does not erase the Christian character of the society or the biblical moral order already embedded in the common law. Both documents were written by people who took that order as given.
Democracy, individual freedoms, limited government and the separation of institutions did not arise in a moral vacuum. They developed in societies that had absorbed the biblical teaching that every person has dignity, that rulers are accountable, and that there are restraints on power that no majority or official can simply ignore. Australia’s Constitution is the product of English institutions and law carrying that inheritance, combined with American federal and rights-protection ideas that rested on the same foundation, and written for a people who were overwhelmingly Christian and who insisted that God be acknowledged in the preamble.
The text of the Constitution Act, the Convention debates, Parkes’s statement, Downer’s intervention, Glynn’s motion, the petitions, and the 1901 census are the primary sources. They show a Christian society writing a Constitution inside the moral and legal order it had inherited, not a secular instrument detached from that order.
Anyone who has an issue with it is welcome to leave.
Everyone knew the new Mass Effect was coming straight out of the craziest wokest leftist WEF UN EU Free Palestine Man-Made Climate Change Cult hell hole anyway.
All the good studios are gone, there are only hormone blocker taking larpers pretending to be developers now.
Mods4eva!
@Ausbobsmit This has got to be a joke.
Please tell me this is not real.
$110,000 fine for a coffee shop not performing balancing acts with expensive washed reusable coffee cups?
End-of-the-world climate change cult fanatics are crazy people.
@TashOlde@ProfJoannaHowe@OneNationAus Yes the national policy is one of the best out of all political parties.
The issue is the Victorian party stating they categorically have zero policy on abortion and don't care about it at all.
@carmel_hilder@Rexdinasaur We don't know, we could be right, we could be wrong about these people, but it's completely fair to be cautious about people who were in the leftist Liberal party for so long.
If too many ex-Libs like Harkin join One Nation and are preselected, it will destroy the party. James Ashby said it best when he told the press that One Nation is different to Labor and the Libs as it doesn't make its candidates in a Petri dish. One Nation needs to reject applicants from ex-Libs or career politicians/staffers. They need real people with ordinary jobs to create a new breed of politician in Australia. For more, see our latest episode of The Dr Jo Show👇
🔗https://t.co/iUWvNTRipc
MP Helen Haines was repeatedly stuck by a 3,500kg Landcruiser being driven by a pro-Palestine Jew hating lefty.
Who does the left blame?
Pauline Hanson.
@ProfJoannaHowe I'm One Nation all the way, but I care about innocent babies being murdered in the womb more than I care about 20 year "ex" Liberals "experienced advice".
Strike 1 for Harkin.
@TigerAncient@ProfJoannaHowe Pauline was a Liberal for all of 5 minutes before they realised she wasn't a snout in the trough leftist like them then they turfed her in the middle of her election campaign.
Harkin was a snout in the trough Liberal for 20 years.
Thanks for playing.
I'm One Nation all the way.
But Dr Jo is absolutely correct here.
Only One Nation can save Victoria, but who is going to save those babies from being murdered?
I'm not interested in a Liberal 2.0 party.
If these "ex" Liberals whose morals have been erased by living inside the morally bankrupt Liberal party for 20 years are white-ants inside One Nation we are going to crash and burn as a country.
I thought long and hard about making this video because @OneNationAus has been the best of the major parties on abortion by a country mile. However, Colleen Harkin's comments on Friday need to be exposed and called out. They were completely unacceptable.
Radical man hating feminists have turned up the temperature on public discourse once again.
Krissy Barrett won't be kicking their doors in though, because they are leftist women.
Only "far-right" speech will not be tolerated.
(To the leftists, all the right is "far-right".)
Australian feminists are out of control: @Chanelcontos just blamed men for the Helen Haines tragedy. The real problem is the left: the attacker was radicalised on the fringes of the Palestine movement in Australia. Nugent supported the Houthis and expressed support for Hamas. It's not his gender that's the problem. It's his political ideology.
A despicable new low in Australian politics.
I sat with Helen Haines on the cross-bench. Although we disagreed on many issues, she was always professional and a thoroughly decent person to work with. The kind and respectful words being said about her by many are 100% correct.
Her criticism of Albanese’s corrupt rorting over the Marrickville Golf Club affair was absolutely correct. She was doing her job, holding the government of the day to account, and standing up for her electorate, who missed out on the largesse of that corruption.
And remember, this wasn’t any ordinary rort — Albanese personally benefited from it, owning a property in the same street — and then he attempted to mislead parliament over it. Many politicians have been forced to resign over much less.
And for that, it’s reported that our despicable Prime Minister decided upon revenge — that Helen Haines needed to be punished — to set an example to other cross-benchers: criticise Albanese, and they’ll come after you with a dirt file.
And think about the timing: Albanese had his minions compile a dirt sheet on Helen Haines and released it in the media at the very same time they were finalising legislation to give the government the power to create false and fictitious “sock puppet” identities to disseminate government propaganda.
The revenge attack — the releasing of a dirt sheet on Helen Haines — demonstrates that the Albanese regime is unfit to have such powers.
And then there’s the sickening rank hypocrisy — Albanese calling for a “lowering of the temperature” and to “turn down the temperature” — this from a government that has vilified anyone who questions their economic policies as a “climate denier,” using the term “denier” to equate them to a Holocaust denier.
And anyone who says importing a million people in two years is too many is vilified as a “racist".
And anyone who opposes Albanese’s socialism is vilified as a “far-right extremist".
What an absolutely disgraceful and disgusting government we are living under.
This is how dumb banning guns is.
Good people with guns stop bad people with any kind of weapon.
But Australian leftists would rather all of us be sitting ducks waiting for the next attacker to stroll in and start picking off innocent people one by one.
So simple.
It just takes strong leadership to do it.
Victoria, don't miss this last chance to come back from the brink.
Don't become France, vote One Nation!
One Nation Victoria will make sure no violent foreign criminal slips through the cracks. They will require every non-citizen convicted of a violent offence to be referred to the Commonwealth for visa cancellation. No discretion. No delays. No excuses.
@raglanbeaufort They just want to "ban" everything they don't understand.
Forcing all of us to be at the mercy of criminals who don't abide by their "bans".