@pantomimepundit@ThePosieParker I don't think the man is wrong because he's a man. It's about boundaries. If an unknown adult - male or female - is giving unsolicited personal advice to children they don't know, I think that's inappropriate, regardless of intent.
@pantomimepundit@ThePosieParker I'm taking Kellie's post at face value. If we can't rely on her account, neither your defence nor my criticism stands. If we can, my concern is the behaviour - an unknown adult giving unsolicited personal advice to children he doesn't know. That's a boundary issue, not prejudice.
@pantomimepundit@ThePosieParker Context matters enormously. A man initiating a prolonged conversation with 2 unaccompanied 11 year old girls and giving them unsolicited life advice, despite the fact they didn't know him and were clearly uncomfortable, is highly inappropriate regardless of motive.
Circled is Pro Palestine MP Ayoub Khan
This photo was taken around 8 years ago at Urban Gardens in Telford
To his left is “solicitor” Aqeeb Khan. Aqeeb has been linked to forcing girls to cut and sell drugs. He uses the solicitor firm as a front. He also married a 15 year old in Pakistan
His brother Aqeel impregnated a 13 year old and was exposed in Tommy documentary
In the white robes is Gulfraz Khan aka Bugsy. He was confronted by Tommy in the first Rape of Britain documentary for trafficking children
Centre of photo is celebrity Islamist lawyer and dickhead Akhmed Yakoob
MP Ayoub Khans mates 🤷🏻♂️
The problem in the West regarding Islam is this: so-called “moderate Muslims” are seen as the true representatives of Islam, while terrorists are viewed as radicals or extremists.
In reality, it is the terrorists who represent Islam accurately, while the moderates have little to do with it.
This is a serious problem because as long as moderates are regarded as the voice of Islam, and the Qur’an and main Islamic sources are assumed to be their books, the natural assumption will be that terrorists are merely misinterpreting Islam.
That assumption shields Islamic sources from scrutiny, labels anyone who seeks to examine them as an “Islamophobe,” and leaves those trying to understand terrorist movements chasing their own tails.
Read my first Op-ed on @ChristianPost
Sola Jihad: Salvation by Jihad alone.
the link to the piece in the comments.
...The doctrine of sola jihad explains Manchester, Paris, 9/11, October 7, and every act of Islamic terror. These are not aberrations. They are not perversions. They are Islam’s most consistent application.
The West must stop deceiving itself. Islam is not a religion of peace hijacked by extremists. It is a system that makes failure inevitable and jihad the only way out. And as long as Muslims believe jihad guarantees salvation, the attacks will not stop.
🚨🚨A couple of days ago, I joined an English-speaking Twitter/X Space that was held by Egyptians, Jordanians, and Palestinians, including Gazans. The conversation was about the war in Gaza.
Despite not getting anywhere due to the nonsensical arguments they tried to make, I suppose it was something that can be called a "conversation".
Then they started an Arabic-speaking Space. It quickly turned into a verbal October 7th. They laughed and joked while telling me how they'd rape and slaughter me and every member of my family.
I then listened anonymously while they talked about how discussing the war with an English-speaking audience is different from their usual Arabic Spaces, which they reserve for "humiliating" and "terrorising" Jews and Zionists.
This is the future of Europe and the West.
The people talking to you about Palestinian human rights will be the ones to take away your rights, along with your head if you object.
October 7th is, to millions of people from these societies, one of the greatest days in their modern history. Any regret they exhibit is not for their actions, but for their failure to achieve their aims. They will try again, as soon as they can, because this is what they know. This is what they have always known.
If nothing is done about this, it won't be long before the West meets its October 7th.
By the way, nothing they said had any impact on me. In fact, it reminded me who exactly we're fighting.
It is a comfort to believe the Dark Ages are a relic of history. Yet they remain, separated from us by a single flight. A flight into Beirut, Baghdad, Damascus, Kabul...that's all it takes. There, you will come across the Dark Ages, where the strong prey on, rape, and slaughter the weak.
Don't you ever forget this.
People need to understand that the way the Arab–Israeli conflict is presented in English is completely foreign to us. Not foreign in terms of language, but in terms of content.
In Arabic, the conflict is spelled out clearly: Jews are infidels, they must be eradicated, there is no coexistence, America is the “Great Satan,” and eventually all non-Muslims will be conquered under Islam.
That is the raw, unfiltered language used in Arabic.
But in English, the script changes.
“justice,” “liberation,” “occupation,” “resistance,” and “human rights.”
The words are Westernized, and carefully chosen to resonate with liberal audiences who have no idea what the conversation really sounds like in Arabic.
Arabs laugh when they hear the way the conflict is discussed in English, because they know the two narratives have nothing in common.
One is the truth spoken internally, jihad, annihilation, supremacy.
The other is propaganda for export, justice, freedom, liberation.
@RachelMoiselle The best part are the pro terror commenters trying to fix it by saying "yeah, but it's not so bad, you have to understand that the word Jews is just how Gazans usually refer to Israel so the translation wasn't so wrong"
You do get how that makes it worse, right?
@RachelMoiselle This tells you everything you need to know. The world tries to gaslight us saying that all the Palestinians want is equal rights, when the Palestinians come right out and say what they really want — the annihilation of the Jews.
@RachelMoiselle This translation manipulation to hide the obvious antisemitism and genocidal ideology from the public has been standard in British media for over 10 years.
Important to note that most British Muslims understand Arabic and don't miss the antisemitic message.
@RachelMoiselle It is standard practice to sanitize Palestinians' speech by major news media. "It is our duty to slaughter all the Jews" is rendered as "it is our right to resist the occupation".
I’ve been studying/working in the area of translation since 2011 (albeit with a few years break working for a disability not-for-profit and a production company respectively).
I have never seen a mistranslation as deliberately malicious as this.
The failure to disclose the narrator of this documentary was a Hamas official’s son is of course an egregious breach of BBC’s ethics and standards.
Nonetheless, candidly, as a PhD student in linguistics/machine translation, I think that this deliberate mistranslation to hide genocidal antisemitism is the far graver issue with respect to this documentary. It is the single worst breach of professional translator ethics I have ever seen.
The fact that there has been barely a whisper within the interpreting/translating field about this is most telling. Most telling indeed.
In the past 96 hours, Hamas has executed over 100 Palestinians in Gaza.
Mehdi Hasan? Not a word.
Ana Kasparian? Not a word.
Cenk Uygur? Not a word.
The media? Not a word.
The UN? Not a word.
Something is profoundly broken in Britain.
Jews can’t pray safely, can’t cheer for a football team, and now can’t even wear their faith in public.
Not 1930s Europe, but 2025 UK.
“Gaza Gaza make us proud put the Zios in the ground” mimicking the Oxford student who was just arrested for the same chant. With Hamas terrorists pictured.
This is a student coalition promoting violence. What are @swpolice going to do about it?