@AbHomineDeus People won’t be happy in the hedonic treadmill but we are underestimating the amount of things to do in the future. Imagine someone from the 1600s trying to predict today— no one could do it. Not the aschenbrenners, not the Amodei’s, some things are computationally irreducible
@ReadDoofus@ZZ_SOUL_PLANIT@XiXiDu The idea that a super intelligence will have ‘super morality’ or something like this is dangerously misguided. It will be Dario Amodei’s personal morality + SOTA data analysis/machine learning to apply it as universally as possible
@spicey_lemonade No you wouldn’t need just that, you would need robots living embodied lives and becoming alcoholics like Bender from Futurama, getting addicted to gambling like Dostoevsky. Then I will happily accept AI art. Until that day it is blasphemy and garbage.
@PlastiqSoldier@Michael_Druggan No. Your longtermism is satanic. In any situation an animals that turns their back on their own family for the good of another species is a perverse and demented creature. No different from a bonobo in captivity biting its limbs or filial cannibalism. Diseased and sick.
@realwesmyers Is infinitely scaling ai policy really more tractable than coordinating with other humans? Not saying I think we should pause, or hold hands with China, I’m actually very against that as we stand, but at the limit I’m somewhat skeptical that the former is easier than the latter.
@nabeelqu For all talk about pacing the frontier, whether you think it’s good or bad, Dario is one of the few people in the world, where if you took him out of the last decade, we would possibly be multiple years away from current capabilities. And yet e/acc’s hate him. Actions > rhetoric
@ArtemisConsort@PositivFuturist ‘Taste’, by the time it reaches the uvula it will be oneshotted by the second order internal model that the first internal model itself is safeguarding from lab employees