Gregory A

[Gregory A @Orstralian]

After being blocked by Twitter/X repeatedly I'm moving on, hopefully to a forum that truly does not censor free speech. Thanks for the support from my followers. My 'expulsion' another victory by feminism in a supposedly uncensored environment.

[Gregory A @Orstralian]

It might be I've been blocked by Elon Musk's free speech edict, so this is a test post. If Twitter/X is practicing censorship, then it will be my last post and a ticket out of here.

[Gregory A @Orstralian]

Yes you are going to win, Lastman's Last Day an event set to happen within 100 years. Here's hoping you are a lesbian though. We see you in the background image surrounded by what look like homosexual and monosexual women, a sign to the likelihood of you becoming part of the ruling class. Regardless you look pretty enough to become a member of a bull-dyke's harem of Barbies. Which would still be better than confined to one of the future's brood stalls.

[Gregory A @Orstralian]

@garylfrancione You're the worst kind of parasite, taking advantage of others for your own benefit. The "White Knight" is the biggest fraud in history.

[Gregory A @Orstralian]

@garylfrancione 'You are women who are seeking to abolish men as a sex and to substitute a class of males and females'. How much more stupid can a 'professor' be?

[Gregory A @Orstralian]

We need to feel hunger lest we go hungry. Whereas we don't need sexual desire after the children are born. It becomes a chore, a threat to stable relationships, and a danger to society. An 'appetite suppressant' in that sense is what's needed.

She is also unwittingly advocating female circumcisions.

[Gregory A @Orstralian]

Patriarchy is rapidly transitioning to matriarchy, order to disorder. And is the reason for failing marriages, single parenting, falling birthrates and the general decay of society. Feminism is an incurable cancer that will, with the help of X males, society's traitors, such as yourself, kill off the male in entirety.

Patriarchy emerged as a logical response to the challenges of harder times in the past, while matriarchy, in the softer times of today reflects the innate demands of the X chromosomes.

Nature doesn't prioritize individuals; it's not divine. It shows slightly more concern for genders, focusing primarily on the vehicle that ensures the continuation of our genetic material—the female. As a result, God, Jesus, Moses and Muhammed, along with all all other males, are being subject to a gendercide process.

You are totally discredited by your stupid post.

[Gregory A @Orstralian]

EVs are a great idea, but the real issue lies in their application. The majority of fuel is wasted by commuters rather than long-distance drivers, and policies should focus on this market (small commuter vehicles and motorized shopping carts). Unfortunately, governments always lack insight (being elected by voters, after all) and leave decisions entirely up to capitalism.

[Gregory A @Orstralian]

@darrengrimes If transwomen are men, then transmen are women. And if transwomen can't share women's facilities with women, it follows transmen can't share men's facilities with men. Leaving this strapping chap sharing women's facilities with women:

[Gregory A @Orstralian]

You are saying it's a conspiracy not a concern for safety that's behind this cancellation. Can you be serious??? Why use 'Prof.' as a prefix when clearly you know nothing about sociology. J.K. Rowling too should have stayed anonymous and fought the battle on its own terms not use her status (a writer of children's fiction) to push for something that she needs to accept could be wrong. It's irresponsible attention seeking that you are both guilty of.

[Gregory A @Orstralian]

@LulaLulaGT @faintlyfalling You are dishonest, regardless honesty and justice are concepts and for that reason feminism will win. Bye!

[Gregory A @Orstralian]

Stupidity sustains your patience. The only significant violence involving men and women is in domestic situations. And men means men, all men. If that means men in partnerships, yes, but then that's not 'all men'. And I need to go into detail because it is a complicated issue. Too bad that you don't pick up on anything that does not fit with your feminist doctrine (yes, you are not a feminist and I'm a billionaire). The only people I get involved in on extended debates are those that stupid they don't understand anything I'm saying. Notice how no one is backing you up. You are beaten so back away too.

[Gregory A @Orstralian]

An unreasonable position can only be sustained by unreasonable behavior, in this instance backing away using a formulated excuse. Show me where you have even once answered any of my questions.

Where for example are the statistic to back up your claims that 'men' all over the world are attacking females. When as much as 100 examples in a world populated by 3,000,000,000 men is totally insignificant, stupid. And your stupidity is not in any way entertaining.

Can we use AI to analyze our opposing claims? Yes, but you would still disagree with the outcome.

[Gregory A @Orstralian]

I'm sorry but how can a 'professor' be so completely stupid? You are supposed to think with your neurons not your chromosomes. Can any intelligent person actually believe that this is a power grab by males being carried out by women with a Y chromosome and manifesting as such a minor issue. It's far more obvious that it is tactic by feminism in its ongoing strategy to indict all bearers of the Y chromosome.

[Gregory A @Orstralian]

Pro-women is by default anti-male. If you favor one you oppose the other. How is that not obvious. Feminism makes it clear that it's not humanism. And this fact will become clearer over time. The feminism of yesterday is not the feminism of today and certainly won't be the feminism of tomorrow. As it increases its control it will become more overt in its actions. We see this now as the minor issue of transwomen in regular women's spaces being whipped up into a storm.

[Gregory A @Orstralian]

@preta_6 If you were convinced of the real possibility of a god's existence, would that also lead you to believe feminism is likely wrong? Or would your belief in feminism take priority and strengthen your atheism even further?

[Gregory A @Orstralian]

Using the term 'men' as a generalization implies intentionally or not, 'all men,' revealing that it's as a 'feminist, you're applying it broadly to indict every adult male. Instead, you could say 'some male partners,' but since it also applies to 'some female partners,' as I've mentioned that domestic violence issues exist among lesbians too, it should simply be 'some.' After all, it takes two to tango. And it's your female mentality and now pride that will be preventing you from accepting this. If someone pulled the rug from under me I'd be devastated. But as a female you struggle to see that you may have as much as made a mistake.

Attacks on single (innocent) women are rare.

See how dangerous feminism is. It's after all a primal force that could be said is derived from the X chromosome. Why should our primal nature continue to dominate? Every generation is born naked, inherently primitive. And as conservatism's influence declines, humanity will revert back to a primitive state.

[Gregory A @Orstralian]

Stupid, men actually support your position. You are so blinded by an ideology and the need for the satisfaction it demands you can't see justice without there being a total elimination of all bearers of a Y chromosome, what this supersession process is about. Without the male in existence you will be vulnerable to the harshness of feminist domination, a worker under communist rule. Stop fighting a battle fought by primal forces representing the X chromosomes in its attempt to get rid of the now near redundant Y.

[Gregory A @Orstralian]

No one is talking biology apart from your nasty ideology. Feminism has it in for all bearers of a Y chromosome regardless of what form they take. Claiming that only physical traits matter implies disregarding personality entirely. A butch lesbian exhibits pseudo male traits, yet there's no pushback against them from you hate filled ideologues.

[Gregory A @Orstralian]

A country who's population is 5 million men, 5 million women where males killed women would lose half or its people in no time. You say it's men killing women when really its a few individuals who happen to be men (mostly partners in the crime) doing the killing. Exploiting these deaths to indict "males" in general is dishonest. The reality is men save many more women's lives than they take. It is after all part of the male's purpose to protect women.

Stop using the 'All birds fallacy' as an argument. All birds having wings does not make all winged creature birds.

Saying it has to stop regardless is saying either people should not swim in the sea or take the risk of getting bitten by a shark (far more people die of drowning). Stay out of the water. Life has its risks.

So it's tough luck your hate filled bitterness gets no satisfaction with this. Grow a brain and stop being an airhead.

Feminism is an ideology not a cause. The 'plight' of women is the basis of a demand that's part of the demanding nature of females. The 'girls cry more than boys' thing.