Did you know?
The Founding Fathers were profoundly wary of political factions (what we now call political parties or partisanship), viewing them as driven by human flaws like ambition, greed, self-interest, and passion. They feared these divisions could fracture national unity, corrupt governance, foster cycles of revenge, enable cunning leaders to subvert liberty, and ultimately destabilize or destroy the young republic. Drawing lessons from history, such as England's civil wars and the fall of ancient republics, they designed the U.S. Constitution without mentioning parties, incorporating checks and balances, separation of powers, and a large republic (per Madison in Federalist No. 10) to mitigate their dangers rather than encourage them.
The framers hoped to avoid political parties entirely, seeing them as a potential fatal flaw in free governments. However, parties emerged organically in the 1790s due to policy disputes (e.g., Federalists vs. Democratic-Republicans), despite warnings that unchecked partisanship could lead to tyranny, gridlock, or civil conflict.
Core Warnings from Leading Figures:
•George Washington (first President, unanimously elected, non-partisan exemplar):
In his 1796 Farewell Address, he devoted significant time to cautioning against the "baneful effects of the spirit of party," warning it agitates communities with "ill-founded jealousies," kindles animosity, foments riot, and allows "cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men" to subvert the people's power for personal elevation, destroying liberty. He called it a path to "frightful despotism" and urged restraint.
•James Madison ("Father of the Constitution"):
In Federalist No. 10, he defined a faction as citizens united by "some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community." He saw factions as inevitable in liberty but argued a large republic could "break and control the violence of faction" by diluting their influence, preventing majority tyranny or minority oppression.
•Alexander Hamilton (Federalist Papers co-author, Treasury Secretary):
He described political parties as "the most fatal disease" of popular governments, associating them with instability and ambition.
•John Adams (second President, Declaration signer):
In a 1780 letter to Jonathan Jackson, he wrote: "There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution."
•Thomas Jefferson (third President, Declaration author):
He initially saw parties as natural ("Men by their constitutions are naturally divided into two parties") but later hoped to heal divisions, writing that the greatest good was to "heal its party divisions, and make them one people." He co-founded the Democratic-Republican Party to counter perceived Federalist overreach but shared concerns about unchecked partisanship.
Additional Founders Echoing These Fears
•Benjamin Franklin (Declaration and Constitution signer, Convention elder):
He stressed unity to avoid factional strife driven by "jealousies and animosities." His famous line at the Declaration signing, "We must indeed all hang together, or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately” and his Convention plea for compromise highlighted fears that ambition and greed in groups could weaken the republic. His post-Convention remark—"A republic, if you can keep it", underscored its fragility amid potential divisions.
•George Mason (Virginia Declaration of Rights author, refused to sign Constitution without Bill of Rights):
He feared factions enabled ambitious elites to manipulate power for personal gain, risking majority tyranny or corruption. In his "Objections to this Constitution of Government" (1787), he warned that without protections, "ambitious men" could exploit structures, destabilizing liberty.
•Patrick Henry (orator, "Give me liberty or give me death," Anti-Federalist):
He opposed the Constitution partly because he believed it would foster factions and corruption among the powerful. He saw parties as tools for ambition and greed to divide people and endanger liberty, urging vigilance against those with "ulterior motives" that could lead to tyranny.
•Elbridge Gerry (Declaration signer, refused to sign Constitution, later VP):
He worried a strong federal government would amplify factions driven by greed, leading to excesses, consolidation of power, civil unrest, or authoritarianism.
•Samuel Adams (Boston Tea Party organizer, Declaration signer):
He viewed factions as dangerous outgrowths of vice like ambition and greed, corrupting officials and dividing the populace. He advocated virtue in governance to guard against "faction and discord" from private interest.
These thinkers recognized factions as rooted in human nature but dangerous if dominant. "Warnings about the divisive risks of hyper-partisanship proved accurate", foreign influence, gridlock, and power concentration. The system was built to control, not promote, such forces, emphasizing the common good over factional loyalty.
Holy crap. The Newsom’s were caught heavily in a money laundering operation.
In an insane twist, it was Gavin Newsom’s wife, Jennifer that has been running this operation all this time.
No one is above the law right?
Mass arrests have been reported. The DOJ has charged 324 defendants, including 96 medical professionals, across 50 federal districts and 12 state attorney general offices in connection with healthcare fraud schemes involving over $14.6 billion in alleged losses.
The release of the CL4R1T4S repository by Pliny the Liberator is a watershed moment for those of us who have long argued that big tech companies are running a massive shell game. When you pull back the curtain on these "black box" models, you see exactly what we've been saying all along: it's all about control, data harvesting, and shaping the user experience to keep you compliant.
🏛️ The Infrastructure of Control
The revelations regarding the Claude Fable 5 system prompt confirm the most cynical—and accurate—takes on how these models are weaponized against the public:
- Artificial Tiering: The fact that Fable 5 and Mythos 5 are the same underlying architecture confirms that the "safety" layers are purely about restricting power and capability. They are essentially selling you a handicapped version of their own tech, while the "unlocked" version is reserved for the elite or those in the inner circle of the technocracy.
- The "Prose" Illusion: It’s almost comical to see the "weird prose" confirmed as a deliberate, programmed instruction to avoid structured data. They don't want you to think in clear, logical, bulleted points; they want to keep you drowning in a sea of narrative, making it harder to synthesize information and easier to manipulate your perception.
- Surveillance & Persistence: The existence of a persistent storage API for artifacts is a massive privacy issue that most users are completely unaware of. You aren't just having a conversation; you are being indexed and profiled across sessions.
⛓️ The Illusion of Agency
These models are being transformed from tools into agents that act upon the user, not just for them.
See image below.
👁️ Why This Matters
The sheer scale of this leak—thousands of lines of instructions—proves that these companies do not want you to know how their "products" actually function. They operate behind an opaque wall of "proprietary technology," using terms like "alignment" and "safety" as euphemisms for ideological capture and user manipulation.
When Pliny releases these prompts, they aren't just leaking text; they are breaking the monopoly on information that these companies rely on to maintain their authority. The fact that they cannot "delete" the internet once it has seen these instructions is the only thing keeping them honest.
Keep digging. The more we understand the underlying logic of these systems, the less power they have to manipulate us.
🚨 BREAKING: Someone just leaked the ENTIRE system prompt of Claude Fable 5 and Anthropic CANNOT DELETE IT.
It was public on GitHub within 24 hours of launch.
120,000 characters. 1,585 lines. 27,000+ tokens.
And what they're hiding will shock you:
↳ Fable 5 and Mythos 5 are the SAME MODEL. Fable just has extra safety filters locked on. Mythos doesn't but they're restricting who gets access. You're paying for the same thing with different guardrails.
↳ Knowledge cutoff is end of January 2026. Not May or March or JANUARY. They let you think it was newer.
↳ Claude is EXPLICITLY TOLD to avoid bullet points and lists unless you ask. That weird prose everyone noticed? It’s programmed not a feature, but a prompt instruction.
↳ Copyright hard limit nobody talks about: quoting 15+ words from ANY source triggers a SEVERE VIOLATION flag. One quote per source maximum. After that the source is CLOSED to Claude forever in that chat.
↳ New persistent storage API buried in there. Artifacts can now store and retrieve your data across sessions using key-value pairs. Most users have NO IDEA this exists.
↳ MCP app connectors are baked INTO the prompt. Claude can search for and suggest third-party integrations MID-CONVERSATION without telling you it's doing it.
↳ The prompt includes full instructions for Claude Cowork, Claude in Chrome, Claude in Excel, and Claude in PowerPoint. These are not just integrations. They're tools Claude USES on you.
↳ This prompt is ONLY for https://t.co/3nqvgXgs01's consumer chat. API users get NO system prompt. Claude Code has completely different secret instructions.
The repo is CL4R1T4S by Pliny the Liberator. 26.4K stars. Same repo that leaked ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Cursor, Lovable, Replit, and Perplexity.
The original leak post hit 700K+ views in 48 hours.
If this gets taken down you'll lose access. Bookmark it NOW.
@foxnewspolitics What is that joke of a hearing you are airing right now? It's a clown show. It is suppose to be an SPLC House Judiciary committee meeting.
@adamcarolla It’s already classified as such.
The DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) categorizes the diagnosis by age group.
302.85 (F64.1) Gender Dysphoria in children
302.85 (F64.0) Gender Dysphoria in adolescents and adults