@TrevorSheatz Incredibly helpful to read this perspective. I have had to embark upon a very similar situation with a close relative in a polyamorous “marriage” situation with young children involved. Completely devastating.
I lift your brother up to the Lord tonight, Trevor.
@farmingandJesus All of the evidence points to Tyler Robinson which is why I believe he murdered Charlie.
Candace Owens is also committing a form of murder in her heart toward his wife and all who oppose her. She is not a Christian and should not be given any air time on the subject.
@JonnyRoot_ I did my best watch this movie as neutrally as I could. I WANTED to love it, but for all of the reasons you stated, it ripped my heart/mind out of the world Nolan created.
I left the theater sad, I wanted to be emotionally moved — like in Interstellar. But alas ❤️🩹
@JonnyRoot_ I could not agree more. It is so disappointing to see such a revered director like Christopher Nolan condescending reasonable critiques to this and justifying these types of decisions.
Hello Mrs. Owens,
You told millions of people that Tyler Robinson "wasn't even there." That you felt "confident stating that Tyler Robinson did not kill murder Charlie Kirk."
He was on camera. Prone on the Losi rooftop at 12:22. Shot at 12:23:28. DNA on the screwdriver at 30 quintillion to one. DNA on the rifle at 1.7 octillion to one. He told his family what he did. His parents helped him surrender. He texted his roommate: "I am, I'm sorry." He engraved "Hey Fascist! Catch!" on the ammunition a month before he used it.
You said police "didn't even question" Lance Twiggs. He was interviewed twice. FBI the morning after. Joint state-federal team seven months later. His own attorney. Voluntary phone surrender. You laughed when you said it.
You told Shawn Ryan a shaped charge killed Charlie. That PETN was in his microphone. The medical examiner says gunshot wound. Bullet fragments were recovered from his body. A .30-06 Mauser with Robinson's DNA was found in the woods. Neither side — not prosecution, not defense — has mentioned explosives. Not once in four days.
You said the shot came from below. The Losi building is above the amphitheater.
You called Erika Kirk a "clinical psychopath" to an audience of millions. You said the assassination was "an occult ritual." You said Charlie was "sitting in a pentagram." You told people Israel killed him because he refused Netanyahu.
You made over a hundred episodes. You built a franchise on a dead man's name.
And the hardest fact of all: Tyler Robinson's own defense lawyers — the people whose entire career is on the line to get him acquitted — have refused to make a single one of your arguments. Not one. They're challenging DNA methodology. They are doing their jobs. You were doing something else entirely.
Charlie Kirk changed my life. He platformed my work when nobody knew who I was. He had my back when I was doxxed. I was the ten-thousandth most important person in his world and I will never be able to repay him.
So I did what I know how to do. I read every transcript. I watched every hour of testimony. I cataloged your claims and I held them up against what was said under oath.
Every single one failed.
I don't know why you did this. I'm not going to speculate on your motives, because that would make me exactly the kind of analyst I've spent my career refusing to be. But I know what you did. You told people confident lies about a dead man's murder, and millions of them believed you, and some of them turned that belief into threats against his widow.
The trial continues. And every day of sworn testimony is another day your words get tested against reality... under oath, on the record, where it counts.
I'll be here for all of it... because just as Charlie defended me, I will do what little I can to defend his legacy and @TPUSA and @MrsErikaKirk from evil.
@megbasham Totally fair. To me — and I’m open-handed on this — the Bible seems to reveal that the Church is Israel, yet God is not done with the Jews.
The vitriol toward those people today and throughout history make me draw your same conclusion.
@craigan87@DiscussingFilm A Chris Nolan take of LOTR would not be objectionable in my view. So long as he was more discerning and trusted better judgement on keeping the culture authentic, with his Nolan twists.
@RickyZege96888@DiscussingFilm But the point I'm making is that using a more European accent would have been more believable. Our American accents are far too modern to be plausibly "believed-in" for an ancient Greek myth of this scope and reputation.