@mbauwens This seems to imply the carrying capacity of a society (the number of people receiving a subsistence-level of goods and services) actually *decreases* as that society's use of technology *increases*.
Maybe the Amish were right.
Or maybe we still do not know how to own.
@deeparocks Well, we don't need permission to do this, we only need raw land ownership (which is difficult, but not impossible), and the courage to distribute that land ownership under terms which ensure it remains "Free as in Freedom", such as described here:
https://t.co/zdggcakcE1
@deeparocks I see what you mean.
The GNU GPL uses Copyright to enforce "Copyleft".
Could we use Property Rights to enforce "Propertyleft"?
https://t.co/md9G94hJK5
@peerbase_ I would like to use crypto to secure land ownership for "use value" to stop the current flow of value from those who do not own enough (tenants) to those who own more than enough (landlords).
@onecommunityorg Abundance reduces profit.
Until we can face this horrifying truth, we will be unable to solve the underlying social issues caused by this conflict.
@wslyvh Distributing land ownership as a mosaic of minimum-viable-villages where user-owned supply-chains produce essential goods and services from a business model empowering us to embrace unbridled abundance without fear while rent and profit slowly disappear.