PB

[potterylover @potterylover]

@DefiantLs Malcolm X said it best about sixty years ago.

[PB @OzziHooper]

@Zakka_Jacob @IfindRetards

[PB @OzziHooper]

@GovPressOffice More death threats from socially awkward troons on power trips

[PB @OzziHooper]

@OliLondonTV Recast this weak ass bitch for the MCU

[Vintage Puroresu プロレス @vintagepuro]

The Briscoes x AJ Styles & Amazing Red (w/Alexis Laree). ‘03 beat. Take me back, even for a day. 📼🎧

[Bonchie @bonchieredstate]

Watching the left, especially the media, go from "well, Charlie Kirk did kind of deserve it because he said some stuff" to total free speech absolutists over the last 24 hours has been a wild ride.

[PB @OzziHooper]

@LilBunnySyd @Mikedude__ @DiscussingFilm Dating someone trans is definitely associated with “MAGA gang” huh. You’re brainwashed beyond reason so no point arguing. Enjoy your day

[PB @OzziHooper]

@LilBunnySyd @Mikedude__ @DiscussingFilm He claims that the killer was part of the “MAGA” gang. Fundamentally untrue. Blatant attempt of media misdirection similar to many other clips seen this week labelling it as anything other than what it was. An extreme leftist who assassinated a man due to his differing beliefs

[PB @OzziHooper]

@Visionary_Mike Why is it so hard to separate freedom of speech and consequences of blatant lies

[PB @OzziHooper]

Good graps

[Cultaholic Wrestling @Cultaholic]

20 years ago today, Bryan Danielson defeated James Gibson to win the ROH World Title at Glory By Honor IV.

Danielson would go on to have a legendary 462-day reign.

[PB @OzziHooper]

@LilBunnySyd @Mikedude__ @DiscussingFilm Anyone who spreads harmful misinformation should face suitable consequences yes. Trump is showing to be a lot less effective in his current term with false promises so I wouldn’t say I “like” him atm. Goodluck on your next attempt of a “gotcha” tho

[PB @OzziHooper]

Nah 😂

[NotKennyRogers @NotKennyRogers]

"Buffalo Bill's dialogue with the woman he lowered into a well in order to make clothing out of her skin was very touching in a way that many of us didn't expect."

- ABC News

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

Words are not violence. When you pretend that views that oppose your own are violence, you are justifying the use of actual violence towards the speaker.

Gender ideology’s reliance on tropes and slogans like ‘words are violence’, its constant rationalisation and justification of using force against opponents and its preference for enforcing compliance through fear rather than permitting debate, are straight out of fascism’s playbook.

‘The function of propaganda is . . . not to weigh and ponder the rights of different people, but exclusively to emphasize the one right which it has set out to argue for. Its task is not to make an objective study of the truth, in so far as it favors the enemy, and then set it before the masses with academic fairness; its task is to serve our own right, always and unflinchingly.’

The words are Hitler’s, but I must have seen trans activists say the same thing, barely rephrased, a thousand times. Your movement seeks to remove rights from others. It is anti-truth and critical thinking, pro-violence, pro-dehumanisation of those who disagree with you, and you are so lacking in self-awareness you cannot see that you are precisely what you pretend to hate.

[Alex Clark @yoalexrapz]

Literally every single controversial “quote” I’ve seen people post that Charlie “said” is either missing words/sentences that provide crucial context or completely made up and it’s really starting to piss me off

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

The Smith-Mundt Act is trending on X, don’t let this momentum die

We must Restore the Smith Mundt Act and call it The Charlie Kirk Act to end legalized mainstream media propaganda

Mike Benz talks with Joe Rogan about what Barack Obama really did by repealing the Smith–Mundt Act
‌
🚨 It’s SO MUCH BIGGER than just allowing use of propaganda on Americans, it allowed for:
‌
- Infiltrate and co-opt the universities
- The unions
- The media
- The politicians
- The judges
‌
It allowed
‌
- Foreign policy establishment can fund groups that effectively work with prosecutors domestically or that work at media, dual sort of dual use
- To give them foreign grants to do media propaganda abroad but they operate here, or social media censorship to coerce foreign countries to pass foreign censorship laws that explicitly and are intended to attack US social media companies and in US peer-to-peer speech
‌
“1948, Congress recognized the Frankensteinian monster they were creating by authorizing a covert permanent department of dirty Tricks. And this is their phrase, not mine, to do this cloak and dagger to infiltrate and co-opt the universities, the unions, the media, the politicians, the judges, the whole swarm army. You know what I have been calling for a long time, the USAID Truman Show”
‌
“That are effectively a movie set being constructed by the US State Department and its sister influence orgs — The CIA”
‌
“So the Smith–Mundt Act was always designed to say, listen, you can do this dirty stuff abroad, but it can't come home. We have that protection, which lasted for 70 years and only, we only lost it a decade ago.” By BARACK OBAMA
‌
ALL THESE THINGS and more were to be allowed to be used OVERSEAS ONLY, the Smith–Mundt Act was created to ensure that
‌
But then Barack Obama got installed, he repealed the Smith–Mundt Act and now ALL THESE TOOLS were used against the American people and we paid for it all
‌
Every person in America needs to watch every second of this video. There would not be a single Democrat voter left. Obama was installed to start the takedown of America and use our own agencies against us
‌
You could also argue THIS is why we have so many activist judges

[PB @OzziHooper]

@AidanThaGod Gets significantly less impressive each match he has

[PB @OzziHooper]

@conan_esq Shameful

[ThePatrioticBlonde™🇺🇸 @ImBreckWorsham]

Okay. I'm going to anger many of you here and many of you are going to choose to "unfollow" me and let me start by saying I truly do not care. Unlike many paid "influencers," I make no money off my social media so there is no financial interest in my keeping you here. This isn't prison. Each and every one of you are under no obligation to be here and you are completely free to go. You will not hurt my feelings in the slightest.

Let me also note that I not only voted for Donald Trump during all three of his presidential runs and worked for his 2016 presidential campaigns, but I knew Charlie Kirk. We were in no way best friends by any means, but I met him several times at various campaign events and considered him a friend. He was a good and decent man.

That said, there have been a lot of theories in regard to what happened to Charlie Kirk since his murder on Wednesday and several people have asked me what my theory is.

I don't have a theory. As a former victims rights advocate and Officer of the Court assigned to hundreds of criminal cases, and being trained to spot inconsistencies in investigations, I was quickly able to put the pieces together based on the official story, which simply made no sense.

One of the most notable aspects relating to Charlie Kirk was his very public praise of Donald Trump. Charlie was a tremendous Trump supporter and was very open and vocal regarding his advocacy of the Trump administration. He was also very pro-Israel. Both are something that stood firm all the way up to the weeks just prior to Charlie's assassination.

In his final weeks, if you go back and watch those final interviews and his final shows, he had begun to openly question Mossad. He also said it may be time to question Mossad's involvement with Jeffrey Epstein and its influence on the government.

When that happened, that made him a liability.

I am not saying in any way shape or form that I believe Donald Trump had anything to do with Charlie Kirk's murder.

I AM saying I believe the same people who are controlling Trump and who ordered him to do an about face on the Epstein issue, murdered Charlie Kirk.

Having someone who was such a strong public advocate for the president beginning to openly question Israel's involvement in influencing our government, at that point, made him a liability. Charlie had a tremendous reach and an enormous platform with Turning Point. When he began to question who was actually running our government, he stopped being an asset and became a liability.

I believe Trump came into this with, and retained all the way up to his second election in November, the best of intentions and a true desire to save America from the Deep State. But I believe the powers that be pulled him aside after Butler and told him that if they had wanted to kill him that day, they would have, that he should consider that a warning shot and that if he refuses to play the game going forward that they will by no means miss next time. I also believe they have compromising information on him that they are threatening to make public, whether that be about him or one of his children, I do not know, but I believe the combination of the information they have on him and their threats to kill him or harm his family is why he pulled back on the Epstein issue.

Charlie had begun to make the connection.

It is clear to me based on all the information I've reviewed and all thats occurred in the weeks and months leading up to Wednesday that Charlie Kirk was murdered by members of the US Government in connection with and at the direct orders of Mossad.

It was done publicly in order to send a very clear and direct message to anyone else with a platform who may dare to publicly question the system.

[PB @OzziHooper]

GOAT

[ً @collixioncowboy]

lmao