Peter Alfthan🇫🇮

[Peter Alfthan🇫🇮 @PAlfthan]

@pbyrokraatti Kumpikaan ei ymmärrä juuri mistään, yhtään mitään. Ovat kaikessa olleet väärässä, mutta kelpaavat lausunto-automaateiksi, sillä julistavat eu-globaalistien agendaa.
Kuinka vähällä järjellä sitä saakaan ääniä vaaleissa...

[Peter Alfthan🇫🇮 @PAlfthan]

@klaus_koo Koska eu haluaa liittyä sotaan.

[Peter Alfthan🇫🇮 @PAlfthan]

Elämme omituisia aikoja;
Vasemmisto puolustaa sananvapautta, vähempää kontrollia ja kokoomus haluaa lisää hallinnon valvontaa kansalaisille, tässä eu chat kontrolli asiassa.
Kokoomuksen edustajat ovat kyllä lähteneet vaaralliselle linjalle euglobalismi palvonnassaan.

[Peter Alfthan🇫🇮 @PAlfthan]

@BTC_for_Freedom Sad but true.

[Brett Erickson @BrettErickson28]

Can we just… drop the facade of morality here for a minute and speak candidly?

Iran is RIGHT for striking vessels in the Strait of Hormuz. I said it, I don’t care if you like it. You’re lying to yourself if you want to act like it’s wrong.

The United States launched a war of aggression against a sovereign country, and this is an obvious and long-identified defense maneuver meant to create asymmetric downside against an overwhelmingly more powerful military adversary.

“Ohhhh but it’s wronggg. What about international lawwwww”

Last I checked, slaughtering 120 schoolchildren in Minab is against international law. Last I checked, launching a war of aggression against a sovereign nation like we see here is against international law. Last I checked, bombing water storage and infrastructure facilities is against international law…

… last I checked, the United States killed three Indian sailors in the Strait of Hormuz by attacking a civilian vessel.

“Ohhhhh but maritime lawwww. UNCLOS”

Y’all check on Cuba lately? The last delivery of oil to Matanzas was the Anatoly Kolodkin in MARCH. The United States is the SOLE reason the Universal couldn’t deliver in May. They have blackouts for 22 hours a day. Their hospitals can’t function.

You can whine all you want about morals and ethics, but maybe take a second to realize how stupid you sound doing it.

[Larry Cook @stopvaccinating]

True

[Peter Alfthan🇫🇮 @PAlfthan]

@M_Simonyan Stubb has been Lindsey Graham's toyboy. Most of his nonsense outcomes have been just copies of Graham's opinions.
He doesn't serve Finland or Her People, but his masters behind the Curtain.

[Peter Alfthan🇫🇮 @PAlfthan]

Eu on todellakin Uusi DDR.

[Paul Walsh @Paul__Walsh]

Ursula von der Leyen has confirmed that everyone in the EU will need to use the EU's app for identity authentication before being able to access or post on social media websites.

🇪🇺 As an expert in online child safety, I am here to expose the misinformation and misdirection in von der Leyen's statements.

Today von der Leyen said:

"This is not about whether children can access social media, it is about whether social media can access our children".

💡The first part is true. This isn't about children. It's about surveillance and combating political dissent. A state that can't control its own citizens is more dangerous than a state rife with criminals. The second part is a PR soundbite that politicians are using like a campaign slogan straight out of 1984.

🇪🇺"The question is no longer if children face risks online, but what can we do to give children a safer start online".

💡No. You can't give children a "safer start" online any more than you can offline. In the offline world, the government doesn't enforce curfews or ban children from entering liquor stores, bars or restaurants. That's a parent's responsibility. The digital world should be no different.

🇪🇺"The age verification app is one of the tools to get it done".

💡This is a contradiction because she also said "It won't be foolproof".

🇪🇺"It's easy to use, it is privacy preserving and it is open source".

💡The app was compromised as soon as it was released. "Privacy-preserving" age verification is an oxymoron. You can't verify a person's age without verifying their identity. Where or how that age is shared afterwards is irrelevant.

🇪🇺"This is basically about putting back the power into the hands of parents".

💡More from 1984. The EU is doing the opposite. Parents are having their authority stripped by politicians who think they know better. Many parents are capable and unaffected by peer pressure, and they know how to use parental controls to block any app classified as 13+. Some teens are safe, their parents trust them, and the state has no business overruling that trust.

🇪🇺"We don't give our children keys to the car before they have their licence"

💡Comparing an app to a car is a false equivalence used to justify mass surveillance. Governments don't decide when a young person is ready for car keys, guardians do.

💡Forcing every adult and child into a biometric checkpoint just to use an app or website is not licensing drivers. It's the state seizing everyone's keys, locking the garage, and forcing every driver to ask a private company for permission to take a drive.

💡 This is a gross, unethical overreach that strips authority from parents while imposing state sanctioned identity verification on every adult who doesn't even have a child.

💡Additionally, people who pass a test, obtain a licence and drive a car aren't forced to use an app to constantly authenticate their suitability to drive.

🇪🇺"We do not let them buy alcohol until they are legally allowed"

💡False equivalence. We don't force every person to show ID at a shopping mall entrance just because a few people might buy alcohol with a meal at a restaurant. Some parents are okay with their 12 year-old going to the mall with friends while others aren't. Either way, it's their choice. Whatever irresponsible decisions some parents might make, every adult in the country shouldn't be forced to pay the price.

🇪🇺"It won't be foolproof"

💡This is all the proof we need to show that the EU and every government know that banning social media for teens won't protect them. When pressed by journalists about VPNs being used to circumvent a ban, politicians always state the ban isn't a silver bullet and will take time. The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan went as far as to say "we know it's not the solution".

💡Either age verification works, or it doesn't. As a technical expert in this space, I can tell you there are no additional steps to take and no progress to be made. Either the approach does what it is supposed to do, or it's not fit for purpose. If they claim a bulletproof solution is coming, it can only mean one thing. They intend to ban or restrict VPNs to people who verify their identity.

🇪🇺"It will take time to invite the cultural change that is already taking shape in our society, just as it took time to outlaw drink driving, just as it took time to use seatbelts in the cars. Great change never happens overnight, but when it comes to our safety it is always worth it".

💡Comparing a social media ban and age verification to seatbelts is a completely broken analogy. Seatbelts are a safety feature that protects children while allowing them to travel in a car. A ban doesn't give kids a seatbelt. It kicks them out of the car entirely.

💡Instead of supporting parents who want to guide their own children through the digital world, this heavy-handed law strips away parental authority by banning the apps and websites that many parents are perfectly fine with and actively monitor.

💡Furthermore, enforcing these bans requires biometric age verification, which means forcing millions of adult citizens to scan their IDs, faces or credit cards just to browse the internet. That isn't a common-sense traffic law.

💡It's a digital checkpoint on every street. True safety means teaching kids how to navigate the digital world safely with real guardrails and parental guidance, not burning down digital spaces for everyone under the guise of protection.

🇪🇺☠️ The EU wants to ban teens from social media so every person is forced to verify their identity before they can read, share or post anything online. In their words, this is to protect children from dangerous content.

🇪🇺☠️ The EU wants to enforce "Chat Control" so every app has to monitor everything people say privately inside it, including apps with end-to-end encryption. In their words, this is to protect children from dangerous criminals.

💡Where this ends

🇪🇺 "If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever".

George Orwell, 1984.

[Peter Alfthan🇫🇮 @PAlfthan]

@AntisepticHorse Visionary.

[Peter Alfthan🇫🇮 @PAlfthan]

@Aatteleppaitte Koko Pride on ja on aina ollutkin pervojen ja pedofiilien performanssia.

[Peter Alfthan🇫🇮 @PAlfthan]

@ramikurimo Eu on demokratian irvikuva, on aina ollut.

[Peter Alfthan🇫🇮 @PAlfthan]

@DietHeartNews Another big war is coming, unless eu & U.S come into their senses.

[Peter Alfthan🇫🇮 @PAlfthan]

Well said!👍

[MW4Liberty @MW4Liberty]

We seal envelopes not because the letter contains a conspiracy, but because the contents belong exclusively to the sender and the receiver.

The "nothing to hide" argument is pure corporate/state propaganda. Privacy isn't about hiding a crime; it's about deciding who gets access to your life. It’s a boundary of power, not a shield for guilt.

[Peter Alfthan🇫🇮 @PAlfthan]

@jukka_mahonen No näinhän siinä tulee käymään yksipuolue järjestelmässämme.

[Peter Alfthan🇫🇮 @PAlfthan]

@vonhietabauer Ei meillä mitään vajetta ole. Koko "demokratia" on täysi illuusio. Pitäisi jo hölmömmänkin tajuta, kun hallitukset vaihtuvat, mutta samat päätökset etenevät aina vain. Eikä yksikään hallitus tuo kansalaiselle hyötyä, etua eikä vapautta, vaan kontrollia ja köyhyyttä.

[Peter Alfthan🇫🇮 @PAlfthan]

@impi_waara Kommunismi ja kapitalismi luovat molemmat plutokratian.
Ei niissä lopulta suurta eroa edes ole.
Kuuban surkea tilanne johtuu kuitenkin pääosin jenkkien taloussaarrosta, eikä vain kommunismista. Eu:n globalismin kauheus, alkaa vasta kuoriutua, vielä moni luulee olevansa vapaa.

[Kirill Dmitriev @kadmitriev]

EU warmongering bureaucrats know their civilizationally wrong policies on immigration, crime, energy and the economy can survive only through Chat Control, Media Control and Mind Control.