@it_backwards @MercurialMiss @Snow_Booper @mikerugnetta There’s definitely an Eric Andre meme - the one with the gun - in here somewhere, I’m just in the middle of something right now and can’t quite wrap my brain around it.
@Skylos_Official whoooaaaaaaaa - no. Didn’t know this. There is basically nothing I can do about it, but I’ll see - at the very least - if someone can leave a comment on this video from the IC acct speaking in support of the HK protests.
@QuinnWhalen1 mmmm… off the top of my head:
- Modern Warfare rewriting history to make entertainment less challenging to its demo
- Netflix’s decision to allow users to speed up video
- Facebook’s turmoil of the week
- Spotify as an “affect aggregator”
@caloboyle This blows my mind. I’m always impressed that the creators of levels like this can keep track of the narrow window of success that’s possible. It’s a sort of detail oriented videw I can’t imagine having.
Scary monsters can actually fit nicely into 5 main categories. Check out @PBSIdeaChannel's exploration of Noel Carroll's Taxonomy of Monsters. https://t.co/84BoNa0TmD
left: the "AI generated" portrait Christie's is auctioning off right now
right: outputs from a neural network I trained and put online *over a year ago*.
Does anyone else care about this? Am I crazy for thinking that they really just used my network and are selling the results?
Oh dip - nope, no we didn’t AUTHORSHIP STILL MATTERS
“How Three French Students Used Borrowed Code to Put the First AI Portrait in Christie’s”
https://t.co/RhBHtH5j3p
“We” did “it”.
“The First Artificial Intelligence Portrait to Be Sold at Auction Shatters Expectations, Fetching $432,500 at Christie’s”
https://t.co/hWMTfY4X3k