Please Do Something

Please Do Something - where wisdom meets imagination in a world of decentralized finance.

[Please Do Something @PDSDAO]

https://t.co/R4znxPam0Z

[citter @citterxbt]

https://t.co/YQADCR5f0L

[citter @citterxbt]

https://t.co/o97Rkf6HJr

[citter @citterxbt]

https://t.co/Pyl8FS0ET1

[citter @citterxbt]

ponzi

https://t.co/2yoABX0Xt9

[citter @citterxbt]

https://t.co/nQ2cS6sRwJ

[citter @citterxbt]

https://t.co/HKgrUyZgCL

[citter @citterxbt]

Day 12

Whatg Happened Today?

Minted Harmony tonight and got some codes. Not sharing them publicly yet. The project runs on a ponzi and leaderboard system where you need referrals to climb, at least top 900 to earn a Harmie. That context matters before pushing anyone in. If you are interested, look for codes in the usual places or message me directly on Telegram.

Two calls tonight.

@raikucom has been running a weekly call series where they bring in other projects for in depth conversations covering broader topics in the space. This week featured @ikadotxyz on Bridgeless Capital Markets. The format works because it goes deeper than the usual announcement style spaces: full topic, full discussion, no surface level talking points. Worth showing up to regularly if you are following the ecosystem closely.

@RialoHQ ran a builder call where community members presented their products live. This is the kind of community engagement that separates real builder ecosystems from projects that just talk about building. Good session.

Decibel content is ongoing. Currently sitting at level 63 on @DecibelTrade with a target of 150 to reach the maximum level. The gap is real and the grind to close it is what it is.

What I Found on The Timeline?

Eight today. Apologies to the Telegram channel members who usually get this first. Real life ran long and the laptop came late.

@gondorfi
Building the DeFi layer for prediction markets.
https://t.co/kiKNaYvGUF

Prediction markets need DeFi infrastructure to scale properly and right now that layer is thin. A dedicated DeFi layer built specifically for prediction market mechanics rather than adapted from general DeFi tooling is a cleaner approach. Watching how the liquidity architecture develops.

@PleasingGolden
RWA platform that transforms precious metals into liquid, yield-generating tokens accessible to anyone, anywhere. Powered by Arbitrum.
https://t.co/bVOYGfqxFk

Precious metals as yield generating on-chain assets solves two problems at once: illiquidity and zero native yield. Gold sitting in a vault does nothing. Tokenized gold generating yield on Arbitrum is a different product entirely. The accessibility angle is the right framing for this kind of RWA play.

@shinzonetwork
Blockchain data read layer.
https://t.co/NCIwxQUXcg

Data read infrastructure is foundational and underappreciated until it is not there. A dedicated read layer for blockchain data addresses the performance gap that makes building data heavy applications on-chain painful. Clean positioning on a real problem.

@AurumXLabs
Turning locked liquidity into gold.

The locked liquidity angle combined with the gold framing suggests some kind of collateralization or yield product. Not enough public detail yet. On the list.

@warpspeed_eth
Experimental DeFi.

Experimental is either a honest description of the stage or a positioning choice. Both are fine. Watching.

@crivacyio
Privacy-native KYC protocol built on Canton Network.

Privacy native KYC is a genuine design challenge: most KYC systems require exposing data to verify it. Building that on Canton, which is designed for privacy preserving financial applications, is a credible technical stack for the problem. Worth following as the product details emerge.

@noticedso
Stop networking. Start getting noticed.

The line is doing work. Anti networking positioning in a space built on networking is a sharp angle. Product details needed before saying more.

@yr365art
365 days in a year. Capturing the passage of time on-chain.

On-chain time as an artistic concept has a quiet appeal. The scope is specific and the framing is clean. Watching.

That is Day 12. If you missed the previous recap, it is linked above. Worth reading before this one.

[citter @citterxbt]

Day 11

Content days are underrated. No product testing, no agent builds, no technical setups. Just writing. The people who treat content as the secondary work are the same ones whose finds get ignored because nobody knows how to read their conviction level. The writing is how you show the thinking. Today was two pieces.

What Happened Today?

First, @DecibelTrade versus @HyperliquidX. The comparison matters right now because Hyperliquid has captured the default mental model for perp DEXs and everything else gets evaluated against it. That framing advantages Hyperliquid on metrics it defined for itself. The piece breaks down where that comparison holds and where it doesn't. Read it here: https://t.co/ETz9902yGx

Second, Distributed Key Generation. This one started from going through the @RialoHQ website and tracing a concept that does not get enough structured analysis in CT. DKG sits at the intersection of cryptography and decentralized trust architecture and most write-ups on it are either too shallow or too academic to be useful. This one is neither. Read it here: https://t.co/1nUorrXwAj

Next few days are already oriented around two things.

@neukoai is on the priority watch list. I registered for the Harmony whitelist a few days back. The registration context and what is actually being constructed here warrants focused attention rather than passive monitoring. The full picture is here: https://t.co/p7r9DgnTE8

Also returning to @PixieChess. Played during beta, stepped away. The design decision to give each piece its own distinct mechanics is not a cosmetic choice. It structurally changes the decision tree every game. The tournament format layers competitive incentive on top of that. The combination is worth analyzing properly rather than treating it as background GameFi noise.

What I Found on The Timeline?

Ten projects today. Categorizing by what the architecture actually implies, not what the bio says.

@percolypse
Autonomous engine routing continuous onchain state into deterministic action. Killing latency at the programmable edge.
https://t.co/6IhT3zEODQ

The latency problem at the programmable edge is a systems-level issue that most onchain automation ignores because solving it is harder than building around it. Routing continuous state into deterministic action means the engine has to resolve state conflicts in real time without introducing new failure modes. That is a non-trivial architecture problem. The positioning is specific enough to be credible. Want to see the technical layer before committing to a view.

@darkpoolbase
Dark pool for GPU compute. AI agents buy. Orders stay hidden. Built on Base. Web4.0 infrastructure.
https://t.co/w7FQT2K8fZ

Applying dark pool mechanics to GPU compute is a structurally sound idea. Transparent orderbooks in illiquid markets create front-running conditions that inflate the effective cost of compute for buyers. Hidden orders remove that attack vector. The agent-native buyer side is the more interesting design choice: it assumes the primary demand for GPU compute will come from autonomous systems rather than humans placing manual orders. That is a thesis worth tracking as agent infrastructure matures.

@pulsepredicts
The Prediction Media Application.
https://t.co/r0oRRZ5Zct

Prediction markets and media as a unified product surface makes structural sense. Most prediction market activity is downstream of information flow. Collapsing the distance between the information source and the prediction mechanism reduces friction and potentially improves market efficiency. The execution is what determines whether this is a real product or just a positioning statement about two trends running in parallel. Not enough visible yet.

@OrnnExchange
Financial Products for the AI Economy.
https://t.co/ylBrYX0zQ4

AI economy as a product category needs disaggregation before it means anything analytically. The question is whether the financial products are designed for agent-to-agent settlement, human-to-agent interaction, or just rebranded retail products with AI in the copy. The answer determines whether this is infrastructure or narrative. Not enough surface area yet to know which side of that line Ornn is on.

@eqxlabs
Spot U.S. equities on Hyperliquid. 1:1 Backed. DTC Settled. Regulated Custody.
https://t.co/l77KCZ1nFW

Three specific claims: 1:1 backed, DTC settled, regulated custody. Each one of those is a compliance and operational commitment that most equity-on-chain projects either cannot make or deliberately avoid making. If all three hold under scrutiny this is a structurally differentiated product from the synthetic equity plays that have cycled through CT before. The Hyperliquid deployment puts it in front of an active trading base that already understands perp mechanics and is likely receptive to spot equity exposure on the same infrastructure. This is near the top of the list for closer examination.

@OnRailsFinance
Institutional rails for on-chain finance. Built on Canton Network.

Canton Network is a deliberate infrastructure choice. It is built for institutional-grade privacy and interoperability, which means the target user requires compliance and confidentiality as baseline requirements rather than optional add-ons. Institutional DeFi moves slower than retail but the capital density is orders of magnitude higher. The infrastructure layer that wins that market does not need to compete on CT virality. Worth understanding the full product architecture here.

@abysstrade_
A privacy-native DEX on Midnight Network. Shielded swaps powered by zero-knowledge proofs.

The distinction between privacy-native and privacy-adjacent matters architecturally. Most DEXs that use privacy language are describing optional features layered onto a transparent base. Building natively on Midnight means the privacy guarantees are structural rather than additive. ZK-powered shielded swaps on that foundation means the confidentiality model holds at the execution layer. Midnight is still early ecosystem which increases both the risk and the upside of a native build here.

@levilabstempo
The first intelligence layer built on Tempo powered by MPP.

First mover on a new infrastructure layer is a high-variance position. The value of being first depends entirely on whether the underlying infrastructure compounds into an ecosystem or stalls at infrastructure for its own sake. MPP as the power mechanism is specific enough to be interesting but not enough is publicly visible yet to map the full architecture. On the radar until more surface area appears.

@stealth_fi
Decentralized privacy with rewards on Solana.

Privacy plus incentive mechanism on Solana. The combination is straightforward as a thesis. The analytical question is whether the rewards mechanism is designed to bootstrap genuine privacy-seeking behavior or just farm liquidity that leaves when the incentive does. That distinction determines whether the product has sustainable architecture or a short cycle. Not enough detail visible yet to answer it.

@diapleo
Navigate risk. Allocate smarter.

Risk navigation and capital allocation tools have a high bar to clear. The product has to be measurably better than what a competent human already does manually with existing tooling. That is the benchmark. Generic risk framing without a specific methodology visible is not enough to evaluate. On the list pending more product detail.

@TowerExchange
The AI-powered DEX aggregator on Arc. Testnet coming soon.

Aggregation with an AI routing layer on Arc. The value of AI-powered aggregation over standard aggregation depends on whether the AI is optimizing for outcomes that a deterministic algorithm cannot replicate efficiently. Price routing is largely a solved problem at the aggregation layer. If the AI layer is solving a different problem the positioning needs to make that explicit. Testnet incoming means nothing is live yet. Revisiting when the product is accessible.

That is Day 11. Two content pieces published, two things queued for closer attention, ten projects mapped analytically. Monotone days still produce output. That is the point.

Six figures. Still counting.

[citter @citterxbt]

https://t.co/1TmF5ZQ8bY

[citter @citterxbt]

Day 10

Real life pulled me away for a few days. I am back. The gap doesn't need more explanation than that.

What Happened Today?
The Raiku article is done and published. This one covers ground worth reading if you have been following the @raikucom thread in this series:
https://t.co/DJxrhL5ZM5

I also put together a data thread on Q2 narratives and projects that received funding worth paying attention to. This is part of the breakdown I mentioned being behind on. It is not the full Q2 analysis but it is a start:
https://t.co/2kq5W3XWoG

On the NFT side, two projects are currently taking up my attention.

The first is the Harmony collection by @iris_aurelian. I mentioned getting the whitelist back on Day 4. This one has been building quietly and I think the trajectory is worth following closely if you are not already watching it.

The second is @thembypetra by @petravoice. Different energy, same level of conviction. Both of these are projects I consider genuinely worth monitoring, not just holding and forgetting.

What I Found on The Timeline?
Four projects today.

@cloakdotrade
Private behavioural layer for Solana.
https://t.co/iuOQz7Tpyc

Behavioural privacy on Solana is a specific and underaddressed problem. On-chain behaviour is fully visible by default, which means wallet patterns, trading habits, and interaction histories are readable by anyone paying attention. A privacy layer built around behaviour rather than just transaction amounts is a more complete approach to the problem. Solana-native positioning makes sense given the chain's activity levels. Worth understanding the technical approach before forming a stronger view.

@attentiondotme
A new form of social media. See through the eyes of the people that are shaping the world.
https://t.co/3noxxeMC6r

The framing is sharp. Perspective-sharing as the core social mechanic rather than broadcasting is a genuinely different angle on what a social platform can be. Whether the product delivers on that promise is the question. The positioning alone is interesting enough to keep watching.

@StratiumX
Rebuilding structured finance for the onchain century.
https://t.co/lc6WEGjTjP

Structured finance on-chain has been attempted before with limited success, mostly because the compliance requirements and counterparty trust mechanisms that make traditional structured finance function are hard to replicate in a permissionless environment. The framing here is confident and the scope is large. The execution details are what matter. On the radar.

@metamorphiclabs
From artificial to natural intelligence.

The direction implied in that line is pointed away from current AI trends rather than toward them. Natural intelligence as a destination rather than artificial intelligence as the product is an unusual framing in a space where everyone is racing to make AI bigger and louder. Not enough public detail to understand what this means in practice yet. Watching.

That is Day 10. Two pieces of real output published, two NFT positions active, four new finds. The Q2 breakdown is still not finished but it is moving.

Six figures. Still counting.

[citter @citterxbt]

Day 9

Should be Day 10. I skipped yesterday's recap because the body was not cooperating. The count stays at 9. No point inflating the number to make the streak look cleaner than it is.

What Happened Today?
Most of the focused time went into @DecibelTrade. Scalping, content, and active time in the Telegram and Discord. At this point Decibel is a daily rhythm and that consistency is the point. Conviction without presence is just opinion.

Attended the town hall in @raikucom discord today. There is a piece I want to write about MEV following what one of their interns published. That one is sitting in the queue for tomorrow or the day after. The idea is there, the time was not.

I missed the first @PixieChess tournament. Not going to pretend that does not sting a little. I will be at the next one. And separately: congratulations to the team on the @paradigm funding. That was well earned and it matters for what comes next.

The @0xMiden playground got stuck at step 4. The issue is tied to private notes and the wallet simply would not transact. Sat with it for over an hour before stepping away. That one is unresolved and carries forward.

Checked the @quipnetwork tasks. Did not start them. Tomorrow.

The thing I actually need to address: the Q2 narrative breakdown is late. I did one for Q1 and the small group I run has been waiting on the Q2 version. Real life has pulled me away from finishing it and the VC reading pile behind it is still sitting unread, including some bookmarked writing from @citrini that I am genuinely curious about. That breakdown is the priority that keeps getting pushed and it needs to stop getting pushed.

Plans slip. The work does not disappear. It just waits.

What I Found on The Timeline?
Eight projects today.

@GeneralistAI
Generalist is an AI robotics company building general intelligence for the physical world.
https://t.co/Qveu9u1M4s

Physical world AI is a different bet than the agent and software-layer AI narrative dominating CT right now. Robotics requires hardware, which means longer development cycles and higher capital requirements, but also a cleaner moat once the product works. General intelligence for physical systems is an ambitious scope. Worth watching how they define the boundary of what they are actually building first.

@playrunehero
A master-to-earn MMO ARPG. Powered by @SeiNetwork
https://t.co/gMFOPVbkUC

Master-to-earn is a framing I have not seen before in blockchain gaming. ARPG with MMO structure on Sei is a specific product bet. The genre has an existing audience that takes progression seriously, which is the right foundation for a game that wants to attach real economic value to skill. Early but the genre choice is credible.

@carte_gg
Private beta. Produced by @manifoldxyz
https://t.co/Xvw9LUUMvg

Manifold has a track record worth paying attention to. Whatever is in private beta here carries the weight of that team's history behind it. Not enough public detail to say more than that. The referral link is in the tag if you want early access.

@poddotnetwork
One Market to Rule Them All.
https://t.co/rjaTQRy8NL

Broad positioning that needs product detail to evaluate properly. A single unified market structure is either an aggregation play or a new primitive entirely depending on what sits underneath the claim. On the list until more surfaces.

@sunrise
Any asset, any chain. Live on @Solana from day one. DeFi asset gateway for token listings, day-one liquidity, and canonical markets.
https://t.co/05tNHgsu3T

Day-one liquidity for token listings is a specific and real problem. Most new tokens launch with thin order books and suffer for it in the early days when price discovery matters most. A gateway that addresses that from the first moment of listing is solving something the market actually needs. Solana-native from launch is the right choice for execution speed. Watching.

@unicity_labs
We're building the infrastructure for autonomous agent marketplaces. Billions of AI agents will discover, transact, and settle trustlessly at machine speed.
https://t.co/ZfzSKsJbdg

Agent-to-agent economic infrastructure is a thesis that requires believing the agent layer scales to a point where machine-speed settlement becomes a bottleneck worth solving. That belief is not unreasonable given where the space is heading. If the agent economy develops the way the current trajectory suggests, the settlement and discovery layer becomes critical infrastructure. Early positioning in that space is worth noting.

@0xetch
Seamless inscription-style launches. BTC OG inspired. Launching on MegaETH.

No website listed yet. Inscription mechanics on MegaETH with a BTC OG framing is an interesting cultural and technical combination. MegaETH's speed changes what inscription-style launches can look like in practice. On the list.

@ENDGOALAPP
No bio. No website.
Nothing to read yet. Watching.

That is Day 9. Miden is stuck, Quip is deferred, the MEV piece is queued, and the Q2 breakdown is the thing that needs to actually happen this week.

Six figures. Still counting.

[Please Do Something @PDSDAO]

@citterxbt @DecibelTrade @Decibel_INA when the god hand starting to trade be like.

[Please Do Something @PDSDAO]

@citterxbt noted, king 🫡

[citter @citterxbt]

Day 8

Sick day. Still showed up. Not at full capacity and not pretending otherwise.

What Happened Today?
A friend flagged @0xMiden as something worth paying attention to going forward. That was enough to pull me in for a closer look. A tip from someone whose judgment you trust is a different quality of signal than something landing on your timeline through the algorithm. Filed and watching.

Trade and content for @DecibelTrade happened as usual. At this point it is a consistent part of the week regardless of what else is going on. That is what genuine positioning in a project looks like after enough days of doing it.

Sent some ETH testnet to fund activity on @vibestarterxyz. The platform needs real participation to make sense of it and that requires capital in motion, not just observation from the outside.

The Starknet video was the frustrating part of the day.

I have been working on this bounty submission and today I tried to push the video forward. The storyboard requires text rendered cleanly across multiple frames and right now there is no AI tool that handles that without introducing typos or rendering errors somewhere in the sequence. Not one. I tested the obvious options and hit the same wall each time. It is a specific and genuinely annoying gap in what the tooling can actually do versus what it is marketed as being able to do. The video is paused until I figure out a cleaner path around that problem.

What I Found on The Timeline?
Six projects today.

@SuperSwapINK
SuperSwap - The Gateway to Tokenized Markets. Stocks, Commodities, Currencies and Crypto Onchain. 24/7 and Permissionless Access.
https://t.co/pfO4blIZh6

Tokenized stocks, commodities, and currencies on-chain with permissionless access is a product category that keeps attracting serious attempts because the demand is real. The 24/7 angle matters specifically for traditional assets that are currently locked to market hours. Building on Ink adds an interesting infrastructure choice to watch. Worth tracking how the liquidity depth develops.

@TamitosGame
Welcome to Tamitos World
T·A·L·E O·F U·N·D·E·R·S·T·A·N·D·I·N·G
3D Platformer Adventure | Exploration | Autism Awareness
https://t.co/SRPeEOJxMK

A 3D platformer with autism awareness as a core design principle is a combination that does not show up often in blockchain gaming. The mission angle gives this a different kind of legitimacy than projects that exist purely for financial mechanics. Whether the game itself holds up is the thing to evaluate. On the radar.

@MNX_fi
The AI exchange. Trade OpenAI, Nvidia, and compute.
https://t.co/VGU1FyImDJ

Tradeable exposure to AI compute and the companies running it on-chain is a product that makes sense given where capital attention is sitting right now. OpenAI and Nvidia as named assets adds specificity that most AI-adjacent crypto projects avoid. The execution question is always how the price feeds and settlement work at a credible level. Watching.

@usedaemon
Trust, by Proof.
https://t.co/h2t5zm78aK

Three words doing a lot of work. Proof-based trust infrastructure suggests on-chain verification of some kind but the shape of the product is not clear from what is public yet. The positioning is clean and minimal. On the list until more detail surfaces.

@encrypt_xyz
Encrypted Capital Markets. FHE on Solana.
https://t.co/X6d26cmJP1

Fully homomorphic encryption applied to capital markets on Solana is a technically ambitious positioning. FHE allows computation on encrypted data without decrypting it first, which means trades and positions could theoretically remain private while still being verifiable on-chain. If the team can deliver on that technically, the use case is real. FHE is still computationally expensive at scale so the performance question is the one to watch.

@TeamOratomic
Building the world's first fault-tolerant quantum computers.

No website listed yet. Quantum computing infrastructure is a long horizon bet that rarely fits neatly into a CT narrative cycle. The fault-tolerant framing is specific: most current quantum computers fail at scale because of error rates. Solving that is the hard problem. Early and technical enough that there is not much to evaluate publicly yet.

@GyzerNetwork
No bio. No website.

Nothing to read yet. On the list in case something surfaces.

That is Day 8. Light day by necessity. The Starknet video problem is unresolved and that is the thing carrying into tomorrow alongside the recovery.

Six figures. Still counting.

[citter @citterxbt]

Masuk dari Ethereum, Trading di Aptos. Tanpa Jembatan.

Ronin. Wormhole. Nomad. Kalau kamu ingat nama-nama itu, kamu tahu cerita yang sama diulang tiga kali: aset dikunci di satu chain, representasi aset diterbitkan di chain lain, dan di antara dua titik itu ada satu kontrak pintar yang menjadi target. Ronin kehilangan $625 juta. Wormhole $320 juta. Nomad $190 juta. Dalam ketiga kasus itu, bukan protokol utamanya yang dieksploitasi. Yang dieksploitasi adalah jembatan yang dibangun untuk menghubungkan dua dunia yang seharusnya tidak perlu jembatan sama sekali.

Masalahnya bukan bridge-nya tidak aman. Masalahnya adalah setiap bridge manual menciptakan titik konsentrasi risiko yang tidak ada hubungannya dengan posisi trading kamu. Kamu tidak dibayar untuk menanggung risiko itu. Kamu hanya menanggungnya karena tidak ada pilihan lain.

Decibel memutuskan untuk menghapus titik itu dari desainnya. Bukan menyamarkannya. Menghapusnya.

Bagaimana Deposit Cross-Chain Bekerja di Decibel, Langkah per Langkah

Bayangkan kamu punya USDC di Ethereum dan ingin trading di Decibel yang berjalan di Aptos. Di protokol lain, proses normalnya adalah: buka bridge terpisah, approve transaksi, tunggu konfirmasi, terima wrapped token di chain tujuan, baru bisa deposit ke protokol. Empat sampai lima langkah, masing-masing dengan biaya gas sendiri, dan masing-masing dengan titik kegagalan sendiri.

Di Decibel, kamu hubungkan MetaMask atau Phantom, pilih jumlah yang ingin dideposit, dan selesai.

Yang terjadi di balik layar adalah Circle CCTP, Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol yang dibangun langsung oleh Circle sebagai penerbit USDC. Mekanismenya bekerja dengan cara yang berbeda dari bridge konvensional: USDC kamu di Ethereum dibakar, bukan dikunci. Lalu Circle menerbitkan USDC baru dalam jumlah yang sama di Aptos. Tidak ada aset yang terkunci di kontrak perantara. Tidak ada wrapped token yang nilainya bergantung pada likuiditas pihak ketiga. USDC yang kamu terima di Aptos adalah USDC native, diterbitkan langsung oleh entity yang sama yang menerbitkan USDC di Ethereum.

Kenapa ini penting? Karena eksploitasi bridge klasik bekerja dengan menyerang kontrak penyimpan aset yang terkunci. Kalau tidak ada aset yang terkunci, tidak ada yang bisa dicuri dari titik itu. Mekanisme burn-and-mint Circle memindahkan risiko itu dari smart contract perantara ke Circle sendiri, entitas yang sudah punya regulasi, audit, dan cadangan yang bisa diverifikasi.

Kamu tidak perlu tahu semua ini untuk menggunakan Decibel. Tapi kamu perlu tahu bahwa kemudahan yang kamu rasakan bukan hasil dari UI yang bagus. Itu hasil dari keputusan arsitektur yang menghapus lapisan risiko dari pondasinya.

usDCBL: Stablecoin yang Membuat Fee Tetap di Dalam Ekosistem

Di sebagian besar perps exchange, margin kamu disimpan dalam USDC atau USDT. Setiap kali protokol menghasilkan fee, sebagian dari nilai itu mengalir keluar ke infrastruktur stablecoin pihak ketiga. Protokol tidak punya kendali atas ke mana uang itu pergi setelah keluar. Yield yang seharusnya bisa dikembalikan ke pengguna menghilang ke luar ekosistem.

usDCBL adalah cara Decibel menutup kebocoran itu.

Ini stablecoin native Decibel, nilainya dipatok ke dolar, dijamin oleh USDC dan cash melalui kolaborasi dengan Bridge, perusahaan infrastruktur keuangan yang terafiliasi dengan Stripe. Cara kerjanya sederhana: ketika kamu menyimpan kolateral di Decibel, kamu menyimpannya dalam bentuk usDCBL, bukan USDC langsung. Fee yang dihasilkan dari aktivitas trading tetap berputar di dalam ekosistem usDCBL. Yield dari kolateral yang disimpan tidak keluar ke tempat lain.

Implikasi praktisnya: protokol punya siklus nilai yang tertutup. Semakin banyak aktivitas trading yang terjadi di Decibel, semakin banyak nilai yang berputar di dalam sistemnya sendiri, bukan bocor keluar setiap kali transaksi selesai.

Dan karena usDCBL terintegrasi langsung ke cross-margin account Decibel, kamu bisa meminjam dan meminjamkan menggunakan kolateral yang sama tanpa perlu keluar dari sistem atau konversi tambahan. Satu aset, banyak fungsi, semuanya di dalam satu ekosistem.

Vault Share yang Bisa Dipakai di Luar Vault

Vault di Decibel bisa dibuat oleh siapapun. Performance fee antara nol sampai sepuluh persen, interval bisa diatur antara tiga puluh sampai tiga ratus enam puluh lima hari. Kamu deposit, vault manager mengelola strategi, kamu dapat bagian dari hasil.

Sampai di sini masih terdengar seperti vault biasa.

Yang berbeda adalah apa yang terjadi dengan bukti kepemilikan vault kamu. Di kebanyakan protokol, bukti kepemilikan vault adalah token internal yang hanya bisa digunakan di dalam protokol itu sendiri. Mau pakai sebagai kolateral di lending protocol lain? Tidak bisa. Mau deposit ke yield aggregator? Tidak bisa. Asetmu terkunci secara fungsional meski secara teknis kamu masih pemiliknya.

Vault share Decibel adalah token yang komposabel dengan seluruh ekosistem DeFi di Aptos. Artinya kamu bisa deposit ke vault Decibel, terima vault share token, lalu gunakan token itu sebagai kolateral di protokol lending lain di Aptos, atau deposit ke yield strategy lain, semuanya tanpa menarik posisi vault kamu.

Satu modal bekerja di beberapa tempat secara bersamaan. Itu efisiensi kapital yang tidak bisa kamu replikasi di ekosistem app-chain manapun karena app-chain secara struktural mengisolasi likuiditasnya. Untuk keluar dari app-chain dan masuk ke ekosistem lain, kamu butuh bridge. Dan kamu sudah tahu masalah apa yang dibawa bridge.

Ini bukan fitur yang ditambahkan ke Decibel belakangan. Ini konsekuensi langsung dari keputusan untuk membangun di atas Aptos sebagai general-purpose L1, di mana semua protokol berbagi lingkungan eksekusi yang sama dan aset bisa bergerak bebas di antara mereka tanpa perantara.

Dua Cara Membuat Sesuatu Terasa Mudah

Ada protokol yang membuat sesuatu terasa mudah dengan menyembunyikan langkah-langkah rumitnya di balik UI yang bersih. Tombolnya simpel, prosesnya terasa mulus, tapi semua risiko di balik layar tetap ada. Kamu tidak melihatnya karena desainer yang bagus menyembunyikannya dengan rapi. Tapi kamu tetap terekspos, dan kamu akan tahu ketika kondisi pasar berubah dan sistem mulai menunjukkan retakannya.

Ada protokol yang membuat sesuatu terasa mudah karena memang tidak ada lagi yang perlu disembunyikan. Kompleksitasnya dihapus dari arsitektur, bukan dari tampilan.

Circle CCTP menghapus bridge manual. usDCBL menghapus ketergantungan pada stablecoin eksternal. Vault composability menghapus kebutuhan untuk keluar dari ekosistem setiap kali kamu ingin menggunakan aset kamu di tempat lain.

Dari sisi pengguna hasilnya terasa sama: mudah. Tapi sumbernya berbeda, dan perbedaan sumber itu adalah yang menentukan apakah kemudahan itu masih ada ketika pasar sedang bergerak cepat ke arah yang salah dan kamu butuh sistemnya bekerja persis seperti yang dijanjikan.

@DecibelTrade
@Decibel_INA

[Please Do Something @PDSDAO]

@citterxbt gud explanation by our founder. as always, gg. 🫡

[citter @citterxbt]

Satu-satunya Points Program yang Lebih Senang Kalau Kamu Tidak Ikut.

Setiap kali protokol baru meluncurkan points program, skenarionya hampir selalu sama. Minggu pertama ramai. Orang berbondong-bondong masuk, buat banyak akun, putar volume sebesar mungkin dengan modal sesedikit mungkin, dan tunggu snapshot. Airdrop datang, sebagian besar jatuh ke wallet yang tidak pernah melakukan satu transaksi nyata pun. Pengguna genuine dapat sisa. Bot dapat sisanya.

Ini bukan teori konspirasi. Ini pola yang sudah terjadi cukup sering untuk disebut standar industri.

AMP tidak dirancang dengan pola itu. Dan kalau kamu masih main AMP dengan strategi yang sama yang kamu pakai di points program lain, kamu sedang bermain di game yang berbeda dengan rulebook yang salah.

Kenapa Sistem Berbasis Volume Murni Selalu Bisa Dieksploitasi?

Volume adalah metrik yang paling mudah dipalsukan di crypto. Kamu beli, kamu jual, kamu beli lagi. Tidak ada risiko nyata, tidak ada posisi yang ditahan, tidak ada keyakinan terhadap aset yang diperdagangkan. Hanya angka yang berputar untuk memenuhi threshold.

Protokol yang mengukur kontribusi pengguna murni dari volume yang dihasilkan pada dasarnya membayar siapapun yang punya modal dan kesabaran untuk memutar angka. Bukan trader. Bukan pengguna yang memberi nilai pada ekosistem. Siapapun yang bisa menulis script atau meluangkan waktu untuk klik manual sepanjang hari.

Hasilnya selalu sama: distribusi yang terkonsentrasi di tangan aktor yang paling agresif dalam memainkan sistem, bukan pengguna yang paling berharga bagi protokol.

Decibel tahu ini. Buktinya ada di Week 1.

Apa yang Terjadi di Week 1 dan Kenapa Itu Penting?

Week 1 AMP mendistribusikan 616.739 poin ke 4.564 unique wallets. 67.837 poin berasal dari referrals. Dan sekitar 15.000 poin dicabut dari akun yang terdeteksi melakukan wash trading, lalu dirollforward ke pengguna genuine di distribusi berikutnya.

Clawback bukan fitur yang umum. Kebanyakan protokol tidak mau repot mengaudit aktivitas penggunanya setelah distribusi karena itu rumit, kontroversial, dan butuh sumber daya. Decibel melakukannya di minggu pertama.

Itu bukan kebetulan. Itu sinyal tentang seberapa serius desain insentifnya dijaga.

Kalau kamu pikir clawback hanya terjadi di Week 1 sebagai pesan awal dan setelah itu sistem bisa dimainkan lagi, kamu sedang bertaruh pada asumsi yang tidak ada dasarnya.

Cara AMP Sebenarnya Bekerja

711.200 poin didistribusikan setiap minggu melalui daily snapshots. Bukan real time, snapshot harian. Artinya aktivitas kamu direkam sekali per hari, bukan terus-menerus.

Ada beberapa mekanisme yang berjalan bersamaan.

Trading volume tetap dihitung, tapi bukan satu-satunya variabel. Multiplier diberikan berdasarkan leverage yang digunakan dan pasangan yang diperdagangkan. Alt pairs diberi bobot lebih tinggi dibanding BTC dan ETH. Artinya trader yang memilih pasangan dengan risiko lebih tinggi dan keyakinan lebih besar mendapat lebih banyak poin per dolar volume dibanding trader yang hanya putar BTC tanpa leverage.

Position holding dihitung berdasarkan durasi. Sistem ini secara eksplisit menghukum perilaku masuk-keluar cepat yang menjadi ciri khas wash trading. Posisi yang ditahan lebih lama mendapat bobot lebih tinggi. Kamu tidak bisa dapat poin maksimal dari posisi yang dibuka dan ditutup dalam hitungan menit.

DLP vault deposits mendapat alokasi poin tersendiri, terpisah dari trading. Maker boosts baru-baru ini juga ditingkatkan, artinya liquidity provider aktif mendapat kompensasi yang lebih baik dari sebelumnya.

Referrals menghasilkan poin dari aktivitas orang yang kamu ajak masuk, bukan hanya dari pendaftaran. Ini penting karena artinya referral yang tidak aktif tidak menghasilkan apa-apa.

Daily streaks mengakumulasi bonus yang tumbuh secara progresif. Konsistensi dihargai secara struktural, bukan hanya dianjurkan.

Dan Guild Wars menambahkan lapisan kompetisi tim dengan pool 25.000 poin yang diperebutkan berdasarkan P&L tim, bukan volume. Tim dengan trading paling profitable menang, bukan tim yang paling banyak putar angka.

Optimal Play yang Bisa Dieksekusi Sekarang

Bukan tips umum. Ini yang paling langsung dari cara sistem dirancang.

Pilih alt pairs. BTC dan ETH menghasilkan lebih sedikit poin per dolar volume dibanding pasangan lain. Kalau kamu trading BTC karena merasa lebih aman, kamu juga mengoptimalkan untuk poin yang lebih rendah. Pilih pasangan yang kamu punya pendapat tentangnya, bukan pasangan yang paling familiar.

Gunakan leverage dan tahan posisi. Dua variabel ini bekerja bersamaan. Leverage meningkatkan multiplier. Durasi meningkatkan bobot. Posisi dengan leverage yang ditahan lebih lama adalah cara paling efisien untuk mengakumulasi poin dari trading activity. Strategi scalping agresif dengan leverage tinggi tapi durasi pendek tidak dioptimalkan untuk sistem ini.

Deposit ke DLP vault. Ini alokasi poin yang terpisah dari trading. Kalau kamu punya modal yang tidak sedang dipakai untuk posisi aktif, vault adalah cara untuk tetap mengakumulasi poin dari modal yang sedang idle.

Jaga streak harian. Bonus streak tumbuh secara progresif. Memutus streak berarti kehilangan akumulasi yang tidak bisa diganti hanya dengan meningkatkan volume di hari berikutnya.

Ikut Guild Wars dengan tim yang serius soal P&L, bukan hanya soal volume. Pool 25.000 poin diperebutkan berdasarkan siapa yang paling profitable, dan itu filter yang cukup keras untuk memisahkan tim yang trading dengan konviksi dari tim yang hanya hadir untuk terlihat aktif.

Apa yang AMP Sebenarnya Seleksi?

Points program pada dasarnya adalah mekanisme seleksi. Protokol memilih siapa yang mendapat hadiah, dan desain sistemnya menentukan perilaku seperti apa yang diuntungkan.

AMP, dengan semua lapisan multiplier, clawback, duration weighting, dan P&L-based competition-nya, sedang menyeleksi satu tipe pengguna spesifik: trader yang punya pendapat tentang pasar, bersedia menahan posisi berdasarkan pendapat itu, dan cukup konsisten untuk hadir setiap hari.

Itu persis tipe pengguna yang protokol perps butuhkan untuk tumbuh dengan sehat.

Kalau kamu bukan tipe itu, AMP akan terasa sulit untuk dimaksimalkan. Bukan karena sistemnya tidak adil, tapi karena sistemnya memang tidak dirancang untuk kamu.

Dan kalau kamu adalah tipe itu, ini mungkin satu dari sedikit points program yang benar-benar membayar untuk cara trading yang seharusnya kamu lakukan dari awal.

@DecibelTrade
@Decibel_INA

[citter @citterxbt]

Day 7

Full day. Not everything got done. That is the honest version.

What Happened Today?
The website I built for @shelbyserves needed fixing. That is where the morning went. Building something and then going back to clean it up properly are two different skills and the second one is less satisfying but more important. It is done now.

The @Starknet video script got a full restructure. The original draft was not landing the way I wanted it to, so I pulled it apart and rebuilt it. Reworking something you already finished is the part of content production that nobody enjoys and everybody needs to do more of.

Joined the @dac_chain discord today. If you want to join as well, the link is here: https://t.co/Z0zhErcx7h

DAC Chain has been on my list since the Day 1 post. Quantum-proof, non-inflationary blockchain built for RWA, DeFi, AI, and secure data validation. Getting inside the community is the next step after adding something to a watchlist.

Trading and content for @DecibelTrade also happened today. Both are becoming a regular part of the week at this point, which is exactly what consistent positioning in a project you believe in looks like in practice.

The one thing I did not get to: the trenches and initial challenge on @vibestarterxyz. It was on the list. The day ran long on the script and the website. It moves to tomorrow.

What I Found on The Timeline?
Lighter find day. Four projects.

@tydrohq
Tydro is a decentralized, non-custodial liquidity protocol built on Ink and powered by Aave. Not financial advice.
https://t.co/iyLj3vfD95

Aave as the underlying power source is a credible foundation. Building a non-custodial liquidity protocol on top of established infrastructure rather than starting from scratch is a reasonable approach that reduces one layer of technical risk. Ink as the chain is the newer variable here. Worth watching how liquidity depth develops as the product gets more usage.

@buugsdotfunYou're missing something, play again.
https://t.co/7WEYLdbHjI

The framing is doing work. It is short, slightly unsettling, and makes you want to know what you are missing. Whether the product behind it justifies the intrigue is the open question. On the list until more surfaces.

@usxcapital
The first neodollar that's private, gasless, and spendable IRL. Up to 15% when you stake.
https://t.co/y6G8WorYPO

Private, gasless, and spendable in the real world is a three-part claim that each deserve scrutiny on their own. The neodollar framing is trying to carve out a new category rather than compete directly with existing stablecoin positioning. 15% staking yield is a number that always needs a clear explanation of where it comes from. Worth digging into the mechanics before forming a real view.

@frgmnt
Automated yield on stablecoins. Frgmnt grows your savings while you sleep.
https://t.co/vH36dv53WQ

Automated stablecoin yield is a product category with proven demand. The consumer framing, savings while you sleep, is deliberately accessible rather than DeFi-native in its language. That is a positioning choice that targets a different audience than most yield products in CT. Simple enough to explain to someone outside the space. That is harder to build than it sounds.

That is Day 7. Website fixed, script rebuilt, discord joined, trading done, content out. Vibestarter carries over to tomorrow.

Six figures. Still counting.

[citter @citterxbt]

https://t.co/JvK4dRuHZG

[citter @citterxbt]

Semalam, di @DecibelTrade

Sejauh ini semua fiturnya bekerja dengan baik. Jadi ga sabar buat earn lebih banyak di sini sekaligus compound buat dapetin AMP.