@Bond_not_james@Soze_Kobayashi@realpillnuke Okay duru it's okay to call out his bullshit which everyone does have however on the ballot is there a better candidate...and not voting is simply choosing the status quo
PETER OBI DID NOT APPLY FOR OR DREW DOWN ANY USD$30MILLION EXTERNAL LOAN THROUGHOUT HIS 8 YEARS TENOR AS GOVERNOR OF ANAMBRA STATE...[MAR 17, 2006 TO MARCH 17, 2014]
According to the records at the DMO office, Anambra State's external debt profile as at March 31,2006 was approximately $18.87 million
The DMO records as at December 31, 2013 shows Anambra Debt Profile to be $30m
So, total of what PO actually drew down from the USD$123m multilateral funds was actually less than $10m
Peter Obi need to overhaul his media team and beef it up with very smart Development Economists and Investment Bankers
Some of these guys around him as his spokesperson are not that too vast on Financial and Economic Matters
Do your Research always...STUDY TO ALWAYS SHOW YOURSELF APPROVED
OBIARAERI, Nnaemeka Onyeka
08134441140
Please fact check this @grok
State if the loans were multilateral
State the borrower
State the disbursement dates
State the DMO verified figure for external and local debts when obi handed over.
Peter Obi: Subsidy Should Be Domiciled in the Agricultural and Manufacturing Sectors
The subsidy regime in Nigeria emerged amid corruption and criminality. Removing those two factors will give us a clearer picture of whether we actually need subsidies. I believe if we tackle corruption, we might not need subsidies at all. The price of petrol in Nigeria is high. We should ensure a regular supply of crude to local refineries so they can refine it for domestic consumption. That will invariably reduce the cost of fuel. I will allocate subsidies to productive sectors. What we have today is subsidy induced hardship with no gains to justify its removal
Peter Obi, NDC Presidential Candidate
Muse Voice Transcribe is MSL's first real-time audio perception model -- rolling out today. SOTA in streaming speech-to-text, it handles speaker diarization, and endpointing natively in a single model.
Chinese researchers published a paper with a devastating title: "The End of Software Engineering”
it argues software engineering is finished.
In traditional software, code is the carrier of pre-written human logic.
In agentic software, the AI agent is the software.
Code is no longer a permanent monument built by human hands. It is completely ephemeral, dynamically generated, executed, and discarded on the fly by an LLM-driven reasoning loop.
Think about how software delivery has evolved:
• Era 1: On-premise licensed software (you installed it locally)
• Era 2: SaaS (hosted in the cloud, managed by vendors)
• Era 3: Agent-as-a-Service (AaaS)
Each historical shift transferred complexity away from the user. But this latest shift transfers something entirely different.
It transfers decision-making complexity itself.
The paper argues that traditional engineering is hitting a hard complexity wall. Human brains can only hold so much state, manage so many dependencies, and debug so many lines at once.
LLM-based agents scale non-linearly.
They don't just write functions faster. They navigate architectural complexity by outsourcing reasoning to models that improve every single month.
Which means the role of the developer is permanently changing.
You are no longer a code author typing syntax line by line.
You are an intent architect.
Your job is no longer writing the implementation. It is specifying goals, designing multi-agent coordination loops, and auditing outcomes.
However!
Seats still matter. Anambra is not 88 senators.
Tinubu's machine is real(31 governors and having NASS).
Capacity = proven desk + will to point it at this stack.
Incumbency is not talent.
So for this upcoming 2027 election, i studied the popular candidates asking this question
Who can actually deliver there promises, with proof of scale and the things that would block them.
Now after all the Arguments we scored based on these:
- Incumbency power off: reason anyone that wins becomes incubency
- Portfolio of History On: Reason if you have done it before you can do it again
- Will On: if you are not interested even if you have the machine you won't do it
Obi is the best Candidate
Why Obi, in their words: when the house was against him, he still did the production job. That is the only time someone in this set did the thing we are scoring.
Why not Tinubu: not because he cannot. Because his book is open and food is not in it. He delivers what he chooses. He did not choose rice.
Why not Atiku: Customs, VP, Intels, AUN are real. The analogue is deputy under Obasanjo’s majority, not chief executive against a hostile room.
Why not Sowore: no government portfolio. No similar situation.
1/3
So for this upcoming 2027 election, i studied the popular candidates manifesto and speeches and work, and I didn’t ask who is popular.
I asked which 2027 offer actually raises what a naira buys.
currently with:
- Food inflation at 20.3%.
- Income per head $1,556 (was $2,893).
- Poverty still 63%
2/3
And
Obi wins on the food stack: keep subsidy off, secure farms, process food here, rural roads.
Atiku’s cheap crude can move the pump. Cheaper diesel is not cheaper rice.
Tinubu: wait. Sowore: restore subsidy + ₦500k wage we cannot fund.